In post 1414, Aj The Epic wrote:I am not revising history. Just because what I said was misinterpreted does not mean I'm changing what I said. I meant the entire group of you were doing shit all and I was right about it.
From Keyser, there is exactly one part of his two quotes I didn't respond to. To say I ignored his critique is giving him too much credit. So my question is why are you going so far out of your way to twist what I'm saying and misinterpret what I've done?
I wouldn't say I'm going far out of my way at all. All I've seen from you toDay (actually, starting yesterDay when you replaced in) is a promise to catch up which has yielded information from only the first 12 pages of the game, and selective responses to things happening currently when your name is invoked. Where have I misinterpreted what you've done, or twisted what you're saying? Literally what I did is notice a post in which you responded to a post by Keyser in which he asked you several questions, two of which you appeared to ignore. And this:
In post 1367, Aj The Epic wrote:You have shitty priorities. I sleep at night, too.
However,
VOTE: Delee99
The fact that you're relying on me to generate any discussion for you just isn't good.Nor is the idea that you're happy putting someone at L-1 solely off wanting catch-up posts. Your votes are flimsy and there's no town motivation in them.
Are you trying to tell me that I'm twisting what you're saying, or misinterpreting, by deducing that the text in bold is you justifying your vote on DWL? And that, in the bolded text, you were actually referring to me, keyser, dier, and garmr, and not specifically DWL? Because that doesn't make logical sense to me.
I'm sorry if I seem snippy right now, but we have barely more than 3 days left until deadline... My patience is running thin...
Can someone else just tell me if I'm making sense or if I'm off my rocker? I feel like I'm shouting into space at the moment.
