In post 146, hi im Yakko wrote:It read to me as itlepip has no clue what Nos is talking about.
I agree with this.
Also I don't remember saying I hate anyone but I'm too tired and lazy to check on that.
And Nos argument towards pip bothers me more.
In post 146, hi im Yakko wrote:It read to me as itlepip has no clue what Nos is talking about.
In post 63, farside22 wrote:I'm going to be hating you this game.
In post 141, Nosferatu wrote:In post 140, hi im Yakko wrote:Nice face. Are you going anywhere with that (exchange with itlepip) Nosferatu?
I was probably going to vote him because he lied about why he read farside as town. But I wanted him to say it~
In post 179, LoHa wrote:I've read the thread and can't recall a single alignment indicative argument, so we're still in-between RVS and what comes next.
Pip's interactions don't seem forced or otherwise scummy to me and anyone exaggerating the alignment indication of the selfvote looks fishy.
If theLhix is scum his talkative style will reveal a scumslip sooner or later. Same for gung-ho farside.
In post 173, Soren wrote:I've noticed that you have asked reads from several players. What are your own reads?In post 153, TheLhix wrote:*Stares as itlepip bursts into flames*
For general public: All reads? Anyone want to throw them into the hat for general analysis. Shouldn't hinder to see into eachothers guts and minds a bit, if we are honest and truly hunting for scum.
In post 182, Aquanim wrote:@TheLhix: Can I interest you in a vote for Nosferatu based on the points in #178?
In post 183, TheLhix wrote:In post 182, Aquanim wrote:@TheLhix: Can I interest you in a vote for Nosferatu based on the points in #178?
Possibly. I have to go for a few hours, so I don't want to make a play like that then be gone. I see the point as for the same reason I originally was wary of Soren, but it would seem it might be a bit heavier this time. I will think over it and come back later. Seem fair?
In post 180, Aquanim wrote:What are the things you find unconvincing about the arguments I've made so far?
In post 180, Aquanim wrote:Who is exaggerating the impact of the self-vote?
In post 178, Aquanim wrote:As regards Nosferatu:
In post 141, Nosferatu wrote:In post 140, hi im Yakko wrote:Nice face. Are you going anywhere with that (exchange with itlepip) Nosferatu?
I was probably going to vote him because he lied about why he read farside as town. But I wanted him to say it~
into no vote does not read like a town-motivated thing to me.
The whole conversation reads like Nosferatu trying to make a mountain out of a molehill, I agree. The abuse in #148 really is over the top.
UNVOTE: itlepip
VOTE: Nosferatu
Nosferatu, whenever we're both in the thread, we need to have a talk.
In post 181, TheLhix wrote:Pip: He is most likely not to be null, as I have said, he is either as scummy as scum can openly be. Or, he is a hindering town like has been pointed out. If i had to vote now and instantly, it would be the easiest choice.
In post 185, LoHa wrote:In post 180, Aquanim wrote:What are the things you find unconvincing about the arguments I've made so far?
Defensiveness despite claiming to be chill is null because self-preservation is null. Is there another basis for your conclusion?
In post 186, Nosferatu wrote:In post 178, Aquanim wrote:As regards Nosferatu:
In post 141, Nosferatu wrote:In post 140, hi im Yakko wrote:Nice face. Are you going anywhere with that (exchange with itlepip) Nosferatu?
I was probably going to vote him because he lied about why he read farside as town. But I wanted him to say it~
into no vote does not read like a town-motivated thing to me.
The whole conversation reads like Nosferatu trying to make a mountain out of a molehill, I agree. The abuse in #148 really is over the top.
UNVOTE: itlepip
VOTE: Nosferatu
Nosferatu, whenever we're both in the thread, we need to have a talk.
sure, about what?
In post 179, LoHa wrote:I've read the thread and can't recall a single alignment indicative argument, so we're still in-between RVS and what comes next.
Pip's interactions don't seem forced or otherwise scummy to me and anyone exaggerating the alignment indication of the selfvote looks fishy.
If theLhix is scum his talkative style will reveal a scumslip sooner or later. Same for gung-ho farside.
VOTE: Titus
Soren, why did you get lynched on day1 3x?
In post 182, Aquanim wrote:@TheLhix: Can I interest you in a vote for Nosferatu based on the points in #178?
In post 183, TheLhix wrote:In post 182, Aquanim wrote:@TheLhix: Can I interest you in a vote for Nosferatu based on the points in #178?
Possibly. I have to go for a few hours, so I don't want to make a play like that then be gone. I see the point as for the same reason I originally was wary of Soren, but it would seem it might be a bit heavier this time. I will think over it and come back later. Seem fair?
In post 184, Aquanim wrote:In post 183, TheLhix wrote:In post 182, Aquanim wrote:@TheLhix: Can I interest you in a vote for Nosferatu based on the points in #178?
Possibly. I have to go for a few hours, so I don't want to make a play like that then be gone. I see the point as for the same reason I originally was wary of Soren, but it would seem it might be a bit heavier this time. I will think over it and come back later. Seem fair?
I probably won't be here when you get back, but sure. Do get around to it though, the day's ticking.
In post 188, Aquanim wrote:In post 185, LoHa wrote:In post 180, Aquanim wrote:What are the things you find unconvincing about the arguments I've made so far?
Defensiveness despite claiming to be chill is null because self-preservation is null. Is there another basis for your conclusion?
There was the observation that he seems more interested in saying things are scummy than trying to generate more information (the latter being the most important thing for a townie in the early stages of the game IMO).
What about Nosferatu?
Also, why are you voting Titus?
In post 195, LoHa wrote:In post 188, Aquanim wrote:In post 185, LoHa wrote:In post 180, Aquanim wrote:What are the things you find unconvincing about the arguments I've made so far?
Defensiveness despite claiming to be chill is null because self-preservation is null. Is there another basis for your conclusion?
There was the observation that he seems more interested in saying things are scummy than trying to generate more information (the latter being the most important thing for a townie in the early stages of the game IMO).
What about Nosferatu?
Also, why are you voting Titus?
As opposed to Nosferatu she hasn't done anything. I can see Nosferatu's push as newbie town's attempts at getting out of RVS.
Aquanim wrote:In post 186, Nosferatu wrote:In post 178, Aquanim wrote:As regards Nosferatu:
In post 141, Nosferatu wrote:In post 140, hi im Yakko wrote:Nice face. Are you going anywhere with that (exchange with itlepip) Nosferatu?
I was probably going to vote him because he lied about why he read farside as town. But I wanted him to say it~
into no vote does not read like a town-motivated thing to me.
The whole conversation reads like Nosferatu trying to make a mountain out of a molehill, I agree. The abuse in #148 really is over the top.
UNVOTE: itlepip
VOTE: Nosferatu
Nosferatu, whenever we're both in the thread, we need to have a talk.
sure, about what?
Why, after your interaction with itlepip, did you not vote him as you said you intended to?
In post 194, hi im Yakko wrote:In post 182, Aquanim wrote:@TheLhix: Can I interest you in a vote for Nosferatu based on the points in #178?
In post 183, TheLhix wrote:In post 182, Aquanim wrote:@TheLhix: Can I interest you in a vote for Nosferatu based on the points in #178?
Possibly. I have to go for a few hours, so I don't want to make a play like that then be gone. I see the point as for the same reason I originally was wary of Soren, but it would seem it might be a bit heavier this time. I will think over it and come back later. Seem fair?
In post 184, Aquanim wrote:In post 183, TheLhix wrote:In post 182, Aquanim wrote:@TheLhix: Can I interest you in a vote for Nosferatu based on the points in #178?
Possibly. I have to go for a few hours, so I don't want to make a play like that then be gone. I see the point as for the same reason I originally was wary of Soren, but it would seem it might be a bit heavier this time. I will think over it and come back later. Seem fair?
I probably won't be here when you get back, but sure. Do get around to it though, the day's ticking.
Gross. This interaction no me gusta. I think soren might have been right when he said lhix was acting. Lhix just said he has not intention of helping town i.e. wants to be null read. Null reads usually mean staying in the background and playing passively. Weird way of saying he is just gonna do what he said in his op.
The 'play' is a vote. I get not throwing them around like halloween candy, but it hardly seems worth the effort of whether to vote or say no.
@aqua why are you town reading lhix after he said he has no interest in moving the game forward? i.e. Self proclaimed wanting to be null.