In post 456, DrippingGoofball wrote:
Yeah no shit, I should have read the game state before offering to replace in.
You guys know I am a jailkeeper, right?
This claim is bullshit. I'm the town roleblocker.
Git yo ass back on DGB, Molla.
In post 471, talah wrote: In post 273, Syryana wrote: In post 230, Kid A wrote:Have you changed your mind about this? Seems like yiu have two people in your scumpool but voted neither.
My scumpool doesn't have either an FB or a Nosferatu in it anymore. FB primarily because I went and reread the thread and taking into account Molla's point about SC2 players not taking RVS seriously and the fact he's been pretty fucking town since. Nosferatu's posting got a lot better too.
These are both players that pushed back, hard, on both you and Molla. Seems easy to town them for crap reasons if you're scum.
It's also easy to town them for, I don't know, being town?
In post 471, talah wrote: In post 273, Syryana wrote:
Wagons tend to do that when the person being wagoned starts obvtowning.
And your definition of obvtowning is directly above. That's not obvtowning, it's your read and you saying he's been pretty fucking town.
That's phrasing from you, and justification in the form of agreeing with Molla. If you're not *actually* masons with him, then he's not confirmed town to you and you'd need to provide pretty solid reasons Molla's town, otherwise you could just be supporting wrong-town (or scum with him).
Do correct me if you believe I'm wrong.
For obvious reasons you shouldn't think I'm masons with Molla at this point.
And wagons also tend to dissipate when the two drivers decide the wagon sucks and move on. What's your point?
In post 471, talah wrote: In post 273, Syryana wrote: In post 232, talah wrote:Given that I don't like the ABR / ika options and Firebringer might be town given the main drivers are no longer voting him, I'm happy with this in principle and for a couple of other reasons.
VOTE: Syryana
...so you vote one of the drivers? Also is there any particular reason you have to be on a wagon? This also seems like rather a lot of justification for voting me.
Yeah I vote the guy who was sheeping the guy yelling that a player's scum, after the wagon evaporates and they both proceed to do the rounds creating wagons to see if weak spots and easy lynches exist.
The reason I vote you instead of Molla, is that Molla might just be looking for information, and it looks like you're all about securing the lynch... on anyone.
This is pretty blatantly false since I'm the one who wrote the case on FB, not Molla.
In post 471, talah wrote: In post 273, Syryana wrote: In post 232, talah wrote:---
@Syr
Why did you unvote FB when he was at L-2? There was no risk there as long as nobody else voted him. Your unvote was pointless imo.
He was technically at L-1 when I unvoted, primarily because Ika is a lolhammer.
Also because there was no danger in unvoting him. Is my "pointless unvote" why you're scumreading me?
So if we remove risk of the lolhammer, why are you unvoting at "L-1"? You'll agree it diminishes pressure on the wagon, and you then went ahead and justified your unvote by saying that it was waiting until *I* was satisfied?
I'm not responsible for your actions dude and there was no reason to unvote him unless you stared townreading him at that point, which you didn't.
I at no point said you were responsible for my actions and I've frankly no idea why you think I did. I unvoted at "L-1" because this is a blitz game and we have an Ika, as well as me being fully aware that I tend to go balls deep on things when I probably shouldn't. This should be patently obvious (at least the first part).
I also find this interestingly contradictory, since the first half of your scumread against me seems to involve me sheeping Molla, yet this also points at me-scum for
not
sitting on a wagon at "L-1" that I very easily could have.
In post 471, talah wrote:And no, that's not the only reason I'm voting you but it's one of them. If you want full elaboration I think someone else is planning to post something here shortly but it relates to what DGB's posted and possibly your own hivemind/mason references.
What in the name of seven fucks does other people posting have to do with elaborating on YOUR scumread?
In post 471, talah wrote:The other couple of reasons I think you're suspicious are your immediate engagement with me regarding caps-posting which I don't recall from the one or two times previously when we played (when I think you were hydra'ing with ffery and possibly Nacho?). I don't remember the exact context of each game but I remember I liked your posting and attempted to interact. I think your natural state most of the time is a lot less proactive than you're being right now. So I feel you've got something you want to push and it doesn't really look like scumhunting to me. It looks like wanting a lynch and you don't care who.
If you're referring to the fire emblem game, I never posted in that game. If you're referring to something else, you'll have to be more specific.
Actually, nix that. I've no further interest in arguing with scum.
I am finally going to lynch you, after that horrendous Nightless.
