In post 647, wgeurts wrote:UNVOTE:
No it isn't I changed my mind for reasons that will become clear later and others I can give now.
Then you should. Fmpov, you got caught with your hand in the cookie jar.
In post 647, wgeurts wrote:UNVOTE:
No it isn't I changed my mind for reasons that will become clear later and others I can give now.
In post 650, Titus wrote:In post 647, wgeurts wrote:UNVOTE:
No it isn't I changed my mind for reasons that will become clear later and others I can give now.
Then you should. Fmpov, you got caught with your hand in the cookie jar.
In post 643, Titus wrote:In post 581, wgeurts wrote:Then my votes on Jeanne.
Vote is on Jeanne? Funny, Jeanne is not spelled Titus.
In post 651, Reasonably Rational wrote:In post 650, Titus wrote:In post 647, wgeurts wrote:UNVOTE:
No it isn't I changed my mind for reasons that will become clear later and others I can give now.
Then you should. Fmpov, you got caught with your hand in the cookie jar.
If your point of view was what you claim it is, then you cannot draw that conclusion rationally. If you are really town, then scum would know they didn't trigger that situation and would cautiously know it was a trap. You are too smart to expect scum to get "caught" by what you claim was what happened. If you were being honest, you would be looking for scum among the people who were being careful because they knew they didn't cause the 24 hour thing and therefore they would know things weren't as you were implying.
Speaking of your implications and explications ... another post coming.
~Drixx
In post 650, Titus wrote:In post 647, wgeurts wrote:UNVOTE:
No it isn't I changed my mind for reasons that will become clear later and others I can give now.
Then you should. Fmpov, you got caught with your hand in the cookie jar.
In post 652, Reasonably Rational wrote:In post 643, Titus wrote:In post 581, wgeurts wrote:Then my votes on Jeanne.
Vote is on Jeanne? Funny, Jeanne is not spelled Titus.
Damn that's a really scummy move andREALLYscummy post here, Titus. That series of posts by you before the look made it seem like there was only two people to vote for prior to that thing triggering, with all that encoded posts bullshit you were doing in the thread. Just because you have an interesting role doesn't give you the right to lie about a bunch of stuff. Too much manipulation on your part when the first thing you do is make a scummy push based upon a super reasonable vote against you.
Can't believe you intentionally gave the impression that the 24 hour thing would be essentially a private gladiate between Jeanne and LQ, and you made it super clear to everyone that your view was Jeanne was town and so everyone should vote LQ, and then pretend like it's scummy that people didn't trust you when they realized your implications and posts were misleading and/or outright lies. You were so successful at pushing that idea that I actually thought that was real. I thought we were restricted between voting one of those two until I asked Cerb to check with Varsoon about whether it was a normal lynch rules or just whichever of them got the most votes, and Cerb came back and told me we could vote anyone.
That's when I said we should vote you. You clearly were behind the whole thing and you intentionally misled the game on several fronts. What we're seeing isn't town Titus.
If wguerts also thought he had to choose between Jeanne and LQ, and then (like us) realized during the 24 hour period that he could vote for anyone, then you are the logical person to vote for Titus, given that you have repeatedly lied to the game and clearly tried to manipulate us into a false understanding of what was going on for an agenda that seems to have zero town motivation.
If wguerts' reasoning for voting is the same as ours, then we're with him in that.
I expect one hell of a response from you if you expect us to change our mind. I think wguerts is letting you off the hook way too easily Titus.
Irritated by Shenanigans,
Drixx
In post 657, Jeanne11 wrote:So I am the dog? Nice. I love dogs.
Second, I was more concerned with what scum would do. Active smart town vote LQ. Active dumb town vote Jeanne (hence the dog). Scum vote Jeanne or stay out of the box. That's what I expected if LQ scum and no scum in Jeanne Elbrin Suzune.
In post 662, Titus wrote:Klingon's Ranger vote also needs to be explained.
Scum think it's a trap, they all rebel and no vote. They wouldn't have any reason to think it's a trap. You can throw a lot of words out, but unless someone told them, they would have no idea. Even if they did, what scum thinks MASS ANONYMOUS VOTING THAT ENDS THE DAY is town? They think SK.
You also read it as a gladiate which tells me you failed to comprehend posts. A rally cry is not a gladiate.
Nope, scum act like wgeurts. Please read posts. Ty.
In post 663, wgeurts wrote:In post 662, Titus wrote:Klingon's Ranger vote also needs to be explained.
Scum think it's a trap, they all rebel and no vote. They wouldn't have any reason to think it's a trap. You can throw a lot of words out, but unless someone told them, they would have no idea. Even if they did, what scum thinks MASS ANONYMOUS VOTING THAT ENDS THE DAY is town? They think SK.
You also read it as a gladiate which tells me you failed to comprehend posts. A rally cry is not a gladiate.
Nope, scum act like wgeurts. Please read posts. Ty.
It felt it was a trap but done by scum?
Why not vise-versa?
In post 666, wgeurts wrote:Also titus, will you put in your sig "I can't read wgeurts, you should read him the opposite of what I do" for a month if I'm town?
As so far you've never done it right.
In post 665, Reasonably Rational wrote:The very fact that I read all that lead up to the thread lock and took your word that you were informed and we would need to vote between Jeanne and LQ should tell you that you were fairly successful at planting that false dichotomy. Obviously we realized it wasn't actually the only choices, but you cannot deny that you did your very best to set it up to look like only two choices.
In post 671, Jeanne11 wrote:VOTE: wgeurts
The fact is that only scum would say that they cannot be read.
#farmers ftw