In post 921, Keyser Söze wrote: In post 918, A Simple Plan wrote:BlueBloodedToffee was killed. He was
Greetings, BlueBloodedToffee!
You are a
Town Mason
. In addition to your vote, you have the following abilities.
- You may communicate during Pregame and at night in your Private Topic.
You win if all threats to the town have been eliminated.
I would recommend the other town mason not role-claiming until later. As soon as you claim you will basically be confirmed as town (thus, likely a NK).
I can agree with that statement, though I think that leaves room for scum to have a claim/counter-claim. I do wonder how many town masons there might be. I do have a few assumptions on who I might think is a town mason, however.
In post 927, Keyser Söze wrote:Meanmelter makes no comment on the Haschel Cedricson wagon but supports the Garmr lynch.
In post 775, A Simple Plan wrote:
[3]
Garmr - Meanmelter, mykonian, Lalendra [L-3]
[2]
Dierfire - BlueBloodedToffee, Hieirama [L-4]
[2]
Haschel Cedricson - herrcombs, Keyser Söze [L-4]
[1]
Lalendra - Haschel Cedricson [L-5]
Not Voting -
Dierfire, Dwlee99, Garmr
With 11 alive, it takes 6 to lynch.
Deadline -
(expired on 2015-10-17 12:30:00)
Prodding Haschel Cedricson.
I've hinted before I did not like his play style. But He wasn't worth my vote at the time as much as Garmr, and I do not feel at that time the wagon was even kicking off. I went back and reread when you and herrcombs voted for him. I was not personally against the lynch but I would have honestly preferred a Garmr lynch tbh.
In post 929, herrcombs wrote:Feeling better about Keyser being town. Myko can be town until I reread things to make sure, same with DWL. Not sure if the Dier hammer makes him town or if he's just trying to buy town points.
I do not recall you not feeling townie agbout Keyser? You said he was null-town and that he
has been under your radar, but I believe that was the last you mentioned of him. Perhaps you mean you are reassured? Especially with those last two statements who you felt are both town.
In post 930, Keyser Söze wrote:I do not like Hieirama or Meanmelter's posting/movement/activity around the Haschel Cedricson lynch
I do not understand. Are you questioning my inactivity?
Well, for Garmr's wagon. I really feel like I'm having 0 impact on this game. I felt like the only people on the wagon were already on it before I voted for him aside from Lale. I feel like everyone's just kinda shrugged at it. I was hoping it was going to attract attention and questions at me and Garmr, but that didn't seem to happen at all. It stayed constant for awhile, but everyone focused on Lale for awhile, gave Dier a bit of attention until finally Haschel.
As for Lale, I feel her
reasons
have sort of caused her wagon. As you have pointed
out, you felt it was her actions, but let me explain myself. I never liked her, Dier Haschel having small post counts, but at least when Lale posted it was usually content, or at least it is now.
I also didn't like her reasoning day 1 for voting Garmr as she made it off to be a Policy Lynch when I don't really seem why she mentioned anything about it. Her
actions
are pretty good in my book. But her
reasons?
They really do not sit with me well. Her vote against Garmr persisted coming D2. I think she is the only one who read the arguments between Garmr and I, and I feel now she is no longer voting Garmr for a PL. I am not too shocked by her claim (Surely we were gonna have a cop or a doctor, only a matter of time) especially since she was L-1 with the "You can hammer without intent we don't mind" town mindset. I don't like who she protected night one, however. After the claim I feel that's where the wagon crumbled.
Votes I liked:
Keyser reasons,
Herrcombs
Votes I did not like:
Dier and
Haschel
Votes I have no opinion on:
Garmr
It's hard for me to really understand Dier. He plays quite similar to Haschel, which leads me to suspect him as an accomplice because Haschel flipped scum. His lackluster posts, and questionable votes do NOT sit well with me.
And Haschel. I've called him out D2 on two things I did not like, and I felt his responses were merely trying to dodge my accusations against him. However I did misunderstand him in one. I feel his inactivity and meager posts where his real downfall. He appeared to promise more posts, or at least a nice well-thought out post, but I never saw this. Though it still feels much like Pistachi0n, a flash wagon at the end of the day on someone who was inactive. I am not saying Haschel wasn't on my scum radar. But hey it worked right?
In post 956, Garmr wrote:Should I just out the obvious mason so my to catch a scums scheme would work.
In post 958, Garmr wrote:So dwell your a mason how do you feel about me using you to force scums hand.
If you flip town I serenely hope I never ever have to end up in the same game with you.
Now, back to where I left off day 2
VOTE: Garmr
In post 953, Garmr wrote:Well laleandra claimed doctor if she forced to protect confirmed town like a mason scum have to shoot her if she's not lying of she is scum they can't shoot the confirmed townie because of her claim it forces her in a corner
How exactly do you plan to even force a scenario like that?
In post 944, Garmr wrote:that's a
town
win condition through myko to lynch
scum
.
I fixed your spelling.
In post 940, Garmr wrote:I would be willing to vote meanmelter over heirama. I have made points on him but people have been playing it off as not valid because he is voting me.
I've made plenty of great reasons against why you shouldn't even be here for D3. However it seems the only way people are getting lynched this game is if they are:
1.Inactive throughout most of the day/game.
2.It's down to the last few days and we gotta lynch someone soon.
