VitR -> Opportunistic. IT is not standard town behavior to not care who gets lynched as long as someone does. In this particular situation, that would also include yourself.
If you do *not* like the idea of a no lynch, then you need to place a list with everyone in front of no lynch, signifying that, because as it stands, if me, Zindaras, or MGM is not lynched, you don't care if someone else gets lynched OR we no lynch.
Also interesting: VitaminR immediately jumping to answer questions I have posited to LML, while at the same time, supposedly, voting me for putting MGM after no lynch. Please look back on that in later days, everyone.
"He never said MoS' vote was anything it wasn't. He just offered his opinion on the way in which MoS voted. "
When he asked about whether MOS rerolled or not when he rolled a number that was already taken, he was misrepresenting what MOS did. If you want to say he didn't understand and so it wasn't misrepresenting, that's fine, but LML went to the trouble of 'misunderstanding vocally', without looking at MOS's list in other than a passing glance. I find it strange that you just write off LML's 'mistakes' and are at hte same time eager to defend him and join him against me.
"Erm... no, that is what we call a mistake. Misrepresentation is willful. Unless you're arguing that LML was trying to get us all to think that Oman didn't vote for you (which seems a fruitless endeavor at best), that is not misrepresentation. "
Misrepresent: to represent incorrectly, improperly, or falsely.
phail.
The last two bits basically say that I have a different view from LML, and then you vote me.
The reasons for voting me? FOR BEING DEFENSIVE.
Hmm. I'm really sorry, VitaminR. I thought when a townie had four.. no wait five with your vote, votes on him 3 pages into the game for only wanting to lynch a few of the possible suspects for STATED REASONS, that he had the right to
defend himself
.
IF it is scummy for a townie
not
to roll over and take it, please state up now, I'd hate to complicate your wagoning with points of defense. I can be quiet and let you get me lynched if you want.
Again, town, in regards to VitaminR, please note that he has just sided right up next to LML in attacking me.
LML -
"How do you know this? How did you know this? MoS has since explained his method, and unless YOU KNOW SOMETHING that we all don't, this was not a misrepresentation. '
If you had actually READ the post you would have seen that every dice he rolled was one less than the one before it, signifying a smaller pool of people. Not paying attention does not give you the right to be suspicious of those who do.
"I made a slight mistake. To call that a misrepresentation is certainly dumb. Something "easily traceable" like that must be a mistake. That seems fairly obvious to me (and should the town). "
What's interesting is that you goading Oman to vote when he already has was an "easily traceable mistake", however, me putting MGM after no lynch, what is that? Is that something scum would do, immediately saying who their scum buddies were by saying "I'd rather no lynch than lynch...this...one...person...." ?
If so, I would like an explanation as to why you think that is so.
Would I rather no-lynch than lynch MGM at this point in the game? Well, since you read my first post, you
obviously
saw that at the beginning of the parargraph with my list-vote, I put, "I should like to stir the pot a bit to start things off."
I then looked at the mod's example of the list on page one. It goes as follows:
List: Vote: G, K, L, No Lynch, P
I then editted hte letters with names, adding a few here and there. I put MGM at the end because there was a letter at the end of hte first example. Since the whole point of it was to get those players to talk, I( didn't really care if no-lynch was in front of someone or behind someone or up there at all.
I gave some players I have not played with before, like jeep, benefit of the doubt, because I didn't want to list EVERYONE in the list. As I said in my previous post, I am more than willing to move MGM in front of no lynch. It being the very beginning of the day, on day one, with no information, the whole setup was intended to stir up discussion. You of course, you know, saw that, and have been gracious enough to stir up a good bit of discussion by 'turning up the charm'. So to answer your question, I do not have an opinion on MGM. That is why he is on the 'to vote' list, at all. You can take that to mean that I would also rather no-lynch instead of lynching (when I posted that), Zindaras, IH, cubsfan, oman, jeep, and many others. You did not choose to take that opinion, instead focussing on the one person I put after no lynch.
Let me ask you - If you seriously think no-lynch is not an acceptable option at this point in the game, then why do you have no-lynch as preferable an option as anyone else not explicitly stated in your list? Your list states that after me, zindaras, and mgm, you don't care if someone else gets lynched or we no-lynch. Please keep in mind that more people would have to vote no-lynch than for ANY of the five or six or seven people ahead of it on my list for it to be worth
anything
. statistics wise.
Fourth misrepresentation - My voting for MGM after no-lynch is *not* in stone. If you had read the last post, I asked if you wanted me to put MGM in front of no-lynch. I said I Would completely fine with doing that - if you wanted me to. How does that equate to "It's in stone"? You are gerry-mandering, now.
I do like how in your post after that you explain that you are voting MGM to see if there is a link between me and him. I think the stronger link is between you and VitR.
Pooky - I resent that. You are the second person in this game from C&H to insult my intelligence. I do not insult your intelligence. Please respect mine. There is no reason we can not play this game without resorting to name-calling and popularity contests.
Zindaras - if you are going to unvote me, please retract your statement that I am a villainous cur that needs to be lynched, or else, it will seem you are trying to get other people to do your dirty work for you. KThx.
MGM - You haven't done anything that I am aware of that is scummy yet. I posted my list either simulposting with yours or right before. Scum are being opportunistic about this whole thing. I can't imagine I would have___ votes by now if I was really scum.
Dragon Phoenix - What kind of information are you looking for from me? Was that an ask to claim?
I'm at 7-votes, four to lynch. THe earlier ploy of putting me as second on the list and then 'bumping me up' by LML, hopefully, should not go unnoticed.
All of that being said, I will be working outside today. I tend to die awfully quick in large games, so please, everyone, before you put another vote on me, make sure you actually have a good reason to and make sure I haven't been already bumped up to a closer lynching range before you do it, okay?
Question: If someone leads an attack on someone who's already the largest wagon in the game, is it suspicious or not if they state that they find it scummy that the person they just attacked is being 'defensive'?
Last note: I like how nobody even responded to cubsfan on page three. "Skruffs is already at four votes??"
and how PWS who stated a similar thing got two votes for his trouble.
Is there a PROBLEM with people questioning a bandwagon, jeep?
I think it should be employed as soon as you want to start ranking people you think might be acting scummy...
