Open 39: Crush Nightless - Game Over! before 484

[inHimshallibe]

schismatized has asked to be replaced - he's very busy with the start of school. Looking now.

[d3sisted]

Fuck, I didn't realize it's -1

Unvote, and can we get a votecount?

[Guardian]

Fuck, I didn't realize it's -1

What the hell?

How did you possibly not realize this? It is 4 to lynch and I placed the -2 vote right after the vote count.

If you had hammered, would you have had a similar defense? "Fuck, I didn't realize I was hammering"? Not knowing the status of the votes -- and then placing a vote -- after replacing into a 3 page game strikes me a scum tactics.

I am very happy with my vote.

[d3sisted]

No, I didn't realize it was 4 to lynch.

Since this is an open, not a mini, I would've expected 12+ players, meaning 6 or 7 to a hammer.

[Crub]

No, I didn't realize it was 4 to lynch.

Since this is an open, not a mini, I would've expected 12+ players, meaning 6 or 7 to a hammer.

Did you read the thread at all? I don't understand how it's possible for anyone to think that this game had 12+ players?!

vote: d3sisted

[d3sisted]

Yes, I read the thread. I'm going to say this one last time, I didn't realize there were only six players on D1. Think about it, even a Newbie C9 has 7.

[d3sisted]

BTW Crub, I don't know why you're acting all bent out of shape. You didn't even notice it before Kerplunk pointed out it was L-1.

[Crub]

You're right I had forgotton about JDodge's vote on me But then I hadn't just joined the game, read the thread and came to the conclusion that there were 12+ players!

[d3sisted]

Cut me some slack; I'm new around here and 6 player mafia is a concept I hadn't quite grasped yet.

[Kerplunk]

Wouldn't d3sisted be more careful if he was scum?

FoS: Crub and Guardian, for jumping on him so fast.

[Crub]

Wouldn't d3sisted be more careful if he was scum?

FoS: Crub and Guardian, for jumping on him so fast.

He said he thought there were 12+ players? You don't find that odd?

[JDodge]

Kerplunk, wouldn't you agree that the whole "I made a mistake" thing could be a quick cover-up?

[Kerplunk]

Maybe I am not paranoid enough, but if I replace somewhere than I make myself very familiar with the details. Especially when I am scum.

It is odd that he didn't read the thread or that he didn know how many players there are.

@d3sisted: why didn't read the thread? You could have easily seen that there are NOT 12 players in this game.

@all: what does the L-1 vote of d3sisted mean if he did it on purpose? Is he the lyncher and Crub is his target: a little too obvious isn't it? Is he scum: hard to believe, it's very dangerous to put some1 at L-1 if you are not the lyncher. Hmmm... that last train of thought is very interesting.

[d3sisted]

I didn't actually thing "GEE, THERE MUST BE 12+ PLAYERS IN THIS THREAD", I just didn't think there'd be as little as 6.

And sure I may be new, but you actually think if i were scum I'd be stupid enough to come in, randomly shoot off a vote, and on top of that put them at L-1?

[Guardian]

Did you read the thread at all? I don't understand how it's possible for anyone to think that this game had 12+ players?!

Yes, I read the thread. I'm going to say this one last time, I didn't realize there were only six players on D1. Think about it, even a Newbie C9 has 7.

How in hell did you not notice that there were only 6 players, and really only 3 players being active???

I think you are lying, and covering up.

Wouldn't d3sisted be more careful if he was scum?

FoS: Crub and Guardian, for jumping on him so fast.

Kerplunk, that's complete WIFOM -- why are you defending him?

Maybe I am not paranoid enough, but if I replace somewhere than I make myself very familiar with the details. Especially when I am scum.

It is odd that

he didn't read the thread

or that he didn know how many players there are.

Are you not reading?

He has claimed to have read the thread!

@d3sisted: why didn't read the thread? You could have easily seen that there are NOT 12 players in this game.

Exactly...

@all: what does the L-1 vote of d3sisted mean if he did it on purpose? Is he the lyncher and Crub is his target: a little too obvious isn't it?

Why? He gets this nice WIFOM defense from you, and he has the slight chance of winning it all if someone else believes him that his vote is the second vote only.

Is he scum: hard to believe, it's very dangerous to put some1 at L-1 if you are not the lyncher. Hmmm... that last train of thought is very interesting.

Indeed -- he could be the lyncher with another target, as scum would be more worried than that. Or he could be the lyncher with Crub as his target and be trying to WIFOM us.



I don't like how Crub followed me in voting d3sisted even though Crub didn't realize the state of the votes himself. I feel there is probably some connection between them.

That being said, I doubt d3sisted is town at this point. I am happy with my vote.


On preview:

I didn't actually thing "GEE, THERE MUST BE 12+ PLAYERS IN THIS THREAD", I just didn't think there'd be as little as 6.

And sure I may be new, but you actually think if i were scum I'd be stupid enough to come in, randomly shoot off a vote, and on top of that put them at L-1?

This defense, as I've said, is complete WIFOM. I don't buy it.

[d3sisted]

Lmfao. You're just in denial because the bedrock upon which your vote depended entirely has been slid right out from under your feet. You've hit dead end, you're pursuing a lost cause.

Don't buy it? Tough. I do like how you tried to drag Kerplunk into to suspicion pool though. Points for effort.

Unvote; Vote: Guardian

[Kerplunk]

Yes, I read the thread. I'm going to say this one last time, I didn't realize there were only six players on D1. Think about it, even a Newbie C9 has 7.

Err... even with seven players, it is 4 to lynch.

With d3sisted now voting for Guardian, pure OMGUS actually, I am more and more suspicious of d3sisted. I still can't beleive scum would put so much attention to themselves. Even playing the WIFOM card, that's is dangerous.

Still like to know, if d3ssited is scum, what he wanted to accomplish by putting someone deliberately at L-1. Can't figure it out. I'd be happy to vote for him, were it not for the lycnher. I would like to wait for the replacement of schis and see what he thinks.

[JDodge]

Unvote, Vote Count please

I'm fairly certain Kerplunk is the lyncher.

[Kerplunk]

Unvote, Vote Count please

I'm fairly certain Kerplunk is the lyncher.

Lol.

[Crub]

Unvote, Vote Count please

I'm fairly certain Kerplunk is the lyncher.

Yay someone who doesn't think I'm insane!

[Kerplunk]

Attention: I will be away from Thursday untill Monday. If the mod wants to replace me becasue of that, that's fine.

[Guardian]

Why do you think Kerplunk is the lyncher? I get a pro-town feeling from him.

I feel like the scum are probably D3sisted, Crub, and Schis, at this point. Kerplunk could be scum and Schis town though. At this point I would not support a Jdodge lynch, and D3sisted and Crub both seem like good lynch candidates.

[JDodge]

Why do you think Kerplunk is the lyncher? I get a pro-town feeling from him.

I choose not to say at this time.

[Kerplunk]

I am back and to celebrate I post a

votecount.

(2) d3sisted - Crub, Guardian
(1) JDodge - Schismatized
(1) Guardian - d3sisted

not voting:JDodge, kerplunk

I am very curious why you think I am the lyncher, JDodge. You seem very certain. If you are so sure I am the lyncher, why not vote for me?

[JDodge]

Because I was unsure of how many votes were on you, of course. I didn't want to put you at -1 in case I was wrong.

Vote: Kerplunk