Mini 488 - Killings in Clich├®-town - Game Over!

[d3sisted]

As much as I hate to say this, I'm not convinced you're the lynch for today.

Unvote

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The votecount at the top of the page is updated periodically until a new page is reached.

Votecount:

as of post 99, end of page 4

IH -

2

(

Trumpezia, Kison

)
Trumpezia -

2

(

IH, Paradoxombie

)
Head_Honcho -

1

(

Eyceking

)
Eyceking -

1

(

Head_Honcho

)
Jenter Brolincani -

1

(

D3sisted

)
Slash -

1

(

SPAG

)

Not Voting -

TheDeepFriedNinja

Gatorguy91, Slash, Jenter Brolincani

With 11 alive, it's six to lynch.

I am not infallible. If I make a mistake in the votecount, correct me.

[slash]

i have read it it just makes no sense

[d3sisted]

His anxiousness for the day to end is what makes that post scummy.

[d3sisted]

Ok, Jenter, you can take that vote off yourself now. I'm more than convinced you're just trying too hard to act town ("Oh look! My vote was still on myself! What a silly town thing to do, as scum would never do that.")

I was going to mention it earlier, but thought I'd wait a while longer.

Unvote; Vote: Jenter

Right now I'm convinced at least one of the following is scum:
trumpezia, Jenter, Kison, Eyceking

[d3sisted]

Btw, Jenter, I asked the mod to change that double vote on yourself as a reminder that you still had a vote on yourself in the first place. I started suspecting you when you didn't immediately realize it and unvote.

[Jenter Brolincani]

unvote; myself

Sorry, busy days.

desisted; not liking the way you're talking about 'the lynch for today' on page 4. NOBODY could realistically be convinced ANYONE was the lynch for the day unless they were scum. Also, what has Kisn done in the way of being scummy?

Head Honcho; Mildly scummy with the points that have been pointed out, but not too bad.

Trumpezia hasn't posted enough really, although his one or two posts aren't good.

I want to hear more from TDFN, Kison, and SPAG.

[d3sisted]

I said, and I quote myself, "I'm

not

convinced you're the lynch for today." i.e. I do not think you are scummy enough to be lynched.

As for Kison, don't like the way his reason for BWing IH, the way he plays it off like it's a random vote.

Trump, for lurking.

[Jenter Brolincani]

OK.

[trumpezia]

While distancing oneself from a nightkill is scummy, lets look at the facts.

Page one has FL's role.

Page two has nothing referencing this, and midway Jenter randomly talks about masons.

Now, is the reaction there "Oh I guess so" or "WTF, what does he mean by mason's?"

Also, I'm unsure how ignorance is distancing from the nightkill. Night 1 kills are random anyways, and roles are revealed in the daytime, and not to scum beforehand (in the case of doc protection or blocking) therefore that is a null tell.

Yes, but I would still assume everyone read the death scene before posting.

It is distancing from the night kill because the scum would usually be more keen on seeing what roles they caught, really, because they still would have made a conscious choice, perhaps a rather arbitrary one, but a choice nevertheless.

I do not like the way d3sisted is throwing suspicion at everybody. He seems like a scum trying to pressure a townie to say something suspicious, rather than the other way around.

Particularly, I can't see how 41 is scummy; my take is that HH is wanting the day

not

to end, contrary to what d3sisted is claiming. Besides, I don't see this as grounds for voting someone really, but then again, soon d3sisted will have voted everyone in the game...

My vote on IH still stands though, for the same reasons as before.

[d3sisted]

Yes I have been rather jumpy, but I think my most recent vote on Jenter is here to stay.

[IH]

Yes, but I would still assume everyone read the death scene before posting.

It is distancing from the night kill because the scum would usually be more keen on seeing what roles they caught, really, because they still would have made a conscious choice, perhaps a rather arbitrary one, but a choice nevertheless.

So is this just your opinion, or do you have some kind of example to back it up, or just speculation?

You also assume it was a scumkill, and not a vigkill.

You also fail to answer my question of what kind of reaction it was.

[d3sisted]

I think we can all assume it was a scumkill...

>.>

Unless of course you're implying we have a doc/roleblocker.

BTW, I'm not sure I fully understand what you're saying about 'distancing from the night kill' when N0 kills are largely randomized anyway.

[Elias_the_thief]

Gatorguy91 has replaced TheDeepFriedNinja. Thank you Gatorguy!

[Gatorguy91]

You're welcome eliasguy.

IH: Why would a vig kill n0, and not scum?

[Paradoxombie]

It would be very stupid for a vig to kill at random.

[SPAG]

I'm here, what has happened?

[d3sisted]

Damnit to hell, SPAG, get Speed Mafia up and running!

[trumpezia]

Yes, but I would still assume everyone read the death scene before posting.

It is distancing from the night kill because the scum would usually be more keen on seeing what roles they caught, really, because they still would have made a conscious choice, perhaps a rather arbitrary one, but a choice nevertheless.

So is this just your opinion, or do you have some kind of example to back it up, or just speculation?

You also assume it was a scumkill, and not a vigkill.

You also fail to answer my question of what kind of reaction it was.

Realistically, it's most probable by far that it was a scumkill. I don't understand you're question about the reaction. Elaborate?

[IH]

Now, is the reaction there "Oh I guess so" or "WTF, what does he mean by mason's?"

Also, realistically, it's just as likely that it was a vigkill. Or even an SK kill.

[Eyceking]

IH, what? How would it be just as likely that the N0 kill was a vigkill or an SK kill as it is a scum kill?

Firstly, every game has scum (save the really weird ones I won't mention) but not every game has a vigilante or a Serial Killer. Already that makes it more likely that it was a scumkill (ergo not AS likely). Next is I would hope that a vigilante is smart enough not to kill on N0, so that lessens

that

option by a good distance.

Why are you trying to push the notion that the N0 kill was not what the most likely explanation says it was - a scum kill.

[Gatorguy91]

I agree here with Eyceking- IH, why are you trying to convince us scum nokilled and it was an sk/vig?

[slash]

is it even that suspicious that he put out the possibility that it wasnt a scum kill, not worth a vote in my opinion

[d3sisted]

Nice of you to join in, slash. Now, are you going to contribute some content, or should I just vote you the fuck out because I'm tired of the lurking and inactivity.

[d3sisted]

EBWOP: That goes for slash and Head_Honcho.

[Head_Honcho]

If there was a night, I'm pretty sure there was a scum kill. There's no reason for town to random kill, and there are a lot of reasons for scum to night kill...