Open 38 - Jester Mafia 12p (Game Over!) - before 484

[ryan]

Jex: OH for pete's sake. I'm explaining why I quoted what I quoted and than ssf comes on and quotes two lines of my paragraph, COMPLETELY two different things. I quoted an entire quote of Jimmy R while SSF comes back and misquotes me, if anything should be looked at it should be what he quoted and tried to use against me. Craplogic at it's best, but do what ya gotta do.

[Jex]

Jex: OH for pete's sake. I'm explaining why I quoted what I quoted and than ssf comes on and quotes two lines of my paragraph, COMPLETELY two different things. I quoted an entire quote of Jimmy R while SSF comes back and misquotes me, if anything should be looked at it should be what he quoted and tried to use against me. Craplogic at it's best, but do what ya gotta do.

He wasn't using it against you at all. He was making a point about taking things out of context. He wasn't seriously attacking you.

[d3sisted]

Ryan is right, Jimmy's post

did

sound like rolefishing.

As for SSF, I don't see why you're making a joke about grossly distorting others' posts by pulling them out of context when everyone else is posting in absolute seriousness. You are just trying to exaggerate ryan's case over nothing.

Jex, you were really fast to put a vote on someone in a tough situation. As soon as you see ryan is in a spot to easily collect a wagon, you threw one on him with baseless arguments. It's only expected of him to be defensive at this point, seeing as he's getting attacked on 4 fronts.

Unvote; Vote: Jex

[ryan]

Also going to

Unvote

for now until I've heard what the new folk have to say.

I'm sorry Jex did you miss this from Jimmy R after Ben was replaced? You seem to be disappointed that I didn't comment after kerplunk's anaylsis, but look at the above gem, same circumstance, same result YET no FOS on Jimmy, but instead a vote on me? Interesting. You seem to miss the point that SSF 100% misquoted me to make me look scummy. I took Jimmy's exact words when quoting him. You throw a vote on me for that?

[somestrangeflea]

I'm explaining why I quoted what I quoted and than ssf comes on and quotes two lines of my paragraph, COMPLETELY two different things.

Well, you claimed that you don't care about context, why should I?

You seem to miss the point that SSF 100% misquoted me to make me look scummy.

No, I misquoted you to prove the point that context is important. I am not going to attempt a lynch on you because you "claimed scum", since I do not actually believe that you claimed scum. I figured you would've realised that from the smiley face I posted, which you seem to believe has to be on every, single non-serious post.

[Blue Zebra]

Vote Count

Kerplunk (2): ojpower, PookyTheMagicalBear
ojpower (1): somestrangeflea
somestrangeflea (1): JDodge
Jimmy R (1): schismatized
d3sisted (1): Kerplunk
PookyTheMagicalBear (1): ryan
ryan (1): Jex
Jex (1): d3sisted

Not Voting: Nightfall, distad, Jimmy R

With 12 alive, it's 7 votes to lynch.

[Kerplunk]

ryan is being crazy. Why the anger? You're not helping try to catch scum by being so offensive.

And I am sorry d3sisted, but Jimmy R's didn't sound as rolefishing at all. He was merely joking! You really believe someone would stand up after Jimmy's post to claim cop or something? People are stupid, but not that stupid.

And why did you vote for Jex? Why not Jimmy R? I think post 152 is very strange. Repeating the accusations made by ryan about Jimmy and ssf and than voting for Jex(!). I don't know precisely why, but that post reeks like scum.

[ryan]

I've voted for Pooky to see if a few votes will get him contributing. I had a post completely used against me by only taking certain parts out, how would you feel if I quoted you saying this....

I don't know precisely why, but I'm scum.

That wouldn't please you now would it?

[d3sisted]

@Kerplunk: I stated in my previous post why I voted Jex. You've got me wrong, I never said I suspected JimmyR or SSF, I only said that one post sounded like rolefishing, and that SSF shouldn't be taking stuff out of context.

[Kerplunk]

I've voted for Pooky to see if a few votes will get him contributing. I had a post completely used against me by only taking certain parts out, how would you feel if I quoted you saying this....

I don't know precisely why, but I'm scum.

That wouldn't please you now would it?

Nope, but it seems you are using it as a an example. I am not angry.

[Blue Zebra]

schismatized has been replaced by Numenorean7

[JDodge]

Vote: Ryan

for being overly defensive when pushed,

FoS: Jimmy R

for fishing.

[ryan]

Jdodge: Welcome back to the game and nice to see some content from you

[PookyTheMagicalBear]

vote: Ryan

contribute? what would you like me to contribute?

[ryan]

vote: Ryan

contribute? what would you like me to contribute?

HOW about some suspicions? Some content? ANYTHING. You've coasted this entire game scum and now you bandwagon vote me? Somebody who has actually contributed? My vote is firmly on you, nice try lurker.

[d3sisted]

I've thought about it, and the case against ryan largely rings true for me. Besides, Jex wasn't a good vote anyway.

Unvote; Vote: ryan

[distad]

Vote: Pooky

Whoa! A tad opportunistic there? We don't hear anything from you in a week (ever since your "ULTIMATE GUIDE FOR MAFIA" post) and you jump in with a wholly unsubstantiated vote?

First you steer us with "suggestions", then you throw in a bandwagon vote?

Wouldn't it instead have been easier for you to stand up and say that you were scum, like your ultimate guide commands?

I mean... throwing a bandwagon vote out there with no other explanation than "contribute? what would you like me to contribute?"... That's ridiculous.

[distad]

d3sisted: Are you honestly voting for him based on JDodge's vote (his 2nd post this WHOLE game, I believe) and Pooky's vote? Neither of whom have done a thing to stimulate conversation this whole game?

Man... this whole thing is wrong. It reeks of scum-wagoning.

True, ryan was a little defensive. But I don't see that as any worse than what the three of you just did!

[d3sisted]

No, I looked over ryan's posts again and I realized his defenses were very insubstantial.

[distad]

Ryan is right, Jimmy's post

did

sound like rolefishing.

Which one is it, d3? Sounds a bit like bandwagon jumping to me...

[ryan]

FoS: d3sisted and JDodge

You can't say I'm right AND than vote me for being defensive. Bandwagon much? Game, I think we've narrowed down our scum possibilities and it looks rather easy. Pooky, you are still the lynch for today, your scumguide was just too much for me and now you come in and vote me with NO reasoning? Or content? My pressure vote is a solid vote now. And d3sisted and JDodge, I cannot believe that scum would be that dumb as to post how you two have, so I'm predicting one of you is town and the other jumped on to make it look like they were town as well. I would say you three have some explaining to do.

[d3sisted]

No, I said I agree with ryan that Jimmy was rolefishing, but I think his defense to the other accusations are insubstantial.

And ryan, first you try to apply pressure to pooky to "see if a few votes will get him contributing". Then you turn around and FoS me and JDodge, adding that you still think Pooky is the lynch for today? Vote hop much?

[ryan]

I haven't vote hopped, Pooky deserves a pressure vote and you two hopping on an obvious attempt at a bandwagon deserve a FoS. Why so jumpy? JDodge states NO case you think that's acceptable? Come on now

[d3sisted]

I didn't base my vote entirely on what JDodge thinks, I also reread the thread and I think you're the scummiest at this point.

Your posts reek strongly of OMGUS right now, and I think the only reason that you FoS instead of Vote is that you're afraid I will call you on it.

This makes me even more certain that you are scum. My vote is permanent.

[distad]

What part of his posts do you find defensive, d3sisted? I agree... I'm just trying to find out why you see them that way also, though.

As for pooky and jdodge, what do you think of their sudden "contribution"?