I had previously made evident my feelings on PWS.
I think it is particularly interesting that TCS immediately called for our heads
Just a few posts he had made such a point out of "confirm" voting PWS. Why the 180?
-Peter
...since you twice ignored me, do you have any arguments against me that you aren't guilty of yourself? The more you ignore me the more I think the answer is "no." If you really were town you would realize the nature of your mistake and apply it to someone who did the same. That you are content to see my lynch solidifies my opinion that you are scum. The same partially goes for the players who are voting me and not Killajay.Killajay wrote:Venkman seems to be a good candidate
Since you asked so nicely. Killajay isn't guilty of placing the lynching vote. There was a vote count three posts above the hammer. There was no deadline and plenty of time to ask for a claim or any other pieces of information. Even if you had voiced your feelings previously, you were the last one to place your vote. Voicing your opinion and then failing to follow through until the last minute is scum riding the bandwagon. This also contradicts what you stated earlier with killajay.Peter Venkman wrote:Killajay, do you have any arguments against me that you aren't guilty of yourself?
The more you ignore me the more I think the answer is "no." If you really were town you would realize the nature of your mistake and apply it to someone who did the same. That you are content to see my lynch solidifies my opinion that you are scum.The same partially goes for the players who are voting me and not Killajay.
Why didn't you vote PWS earlier if you had voiced suspicions? Is it because you didn't think he was a good candidate? If that is true, then why did you lynch him? I'm boggled at the moment of how crappy the arguments both you and killajay are throwing out without thinking.In fact, if you feel I am such a good candidate why aren't you voting on me? I already claimed. You won't even be accused of quick lynching.
Crap logic.Mr. Flay wrote:Y'know, probably the ONLY reasons I believe PV are that I voted for PWS too, and that I'm pretty sure that he's smart enough to come up with a better excuse than that for lynching, if he was scum. But maybe not...
I have suspicions because you placed someone at -1 lynch. However, you regarded your vote as the hammer. Your excuse is nearly the same as Peter's. I feel that both Peter and you might be scum buddies together and are distancing from each other.killajay wrote:the way i see it... it seems as if everyone is FOS on me so why should I have suspicions...
I think you need to do better than that. You came into this game and placed a vote with no reason. Now you're willing to do it again?killajay wrote:Venkman it's not what you say its the vibe i am getting from you.
Flay why are you wasting your vote when I am town?
Vote: Peter Venkman
How so? Venkman's vote was far more crucial to the PWS quicklynch than Killajay's. I can see a newbie townie replacing in, and immediately voting the person they find scummiest/going along with an apparent consensus. I cannot see a non-noob player like Venks, if town, quickhammering without giving the opportunity to claim.The Central Scrutinizer wrote:vote: killajay
If he's town, his play is the reason we lose.