In post 3861, Reasonably Rational wrote:
Also, to everyone: What would be your first assumption if someone displayed knowledge of an aspect of another players role which they had no way of knowing? There is no combination of alliance meetings by which said knowledge could have reached the player, and the information has absolutely not been shared in this thread.
-Cerb
That they are scum with that player, or that they have an investigative role which they haven't revealed.
Hmm. I don't think the fusion or ally ability thing is odd, I have some evidence that it's happened in at least one other case(arguably, two other cases). What is odd to me though is that TW specifically claimed that on the 2nd, and then in our PT we had, on the 7th they had to go reread their role pm to clarify that they had a power that was linked fusion/alliance specific. You'd think they'd remember that after specifically pointing it out as a defense of someone a few days earlier.
In post 3841, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:I'm not. Mastina may have scum read Maxwell, but she didn't vote him. Scum buddies often do this to each other to appear town.
The next person to blatantly ignore that there was a request for the lynch to be held until something was done in an alliance chat and try to use that as a reason to go after someone is not going to like me after I get done ripping them a new one.
In post 3845, Drixx wrote:I'm sure Cerberus will pick up these two posts and attest to the fact that I'm a 25 on a scale of 1 to 10 in grumpiness today. Make scummy posts at your peril. I've got the gloves off and I'm drinking scotch; we might be in for a bumpy ride.
Hmm. I don't think the fusion or ally ability thing is odd, I have some evidence that it's happened in at least one other case(arguably, two other cases). What is odd to me though is that TW specifically claimed that on the 2nd, and then in our PT we had, on the 7th they had to go reread their role pm to clarify that they had a power that was linked fusion/alliance specific. You'd think they'd remember that after specifically pointing it out as a defense of someone a few days earlier.
In post 3877, Cerberus v666 wrote:Hmm. I don't think the fusion or ally ability thing is odd, I have some evidence that it's happened in at least one other case(arguably, two other cases). What is odd to me though is that TW specifically claimed that on the 2nd, and then in our PT we had, on the 7th they had to go reread their role pm to clarify that they had a power that was linked fusion/alliance specific. You'd think they'd remember that after specifically pointing it out as a defense of someone a few days earlier.
-Cerb
Well, I'll take your word for it. I think it's something to keep in mind.
The main thing keeping me from outright calling TW scum is TSO's push against frogger at the end of D1, which seems like a very counterproductive thing to do.
Do you know Xtoxm and Mastina's flavor names? I would like to know if they both make sense, because I can't really guess two characters who would share a pt with Steven. I think I guessed Mastina's, but there's no second one in my mind.
In post 3877, Cerberus v666 wrote:Hmm. I don't think the fusion or ally ability thing is odd, I have some evidence that it's happened in at least one other case(arguably, two other cases). What is odd to me though is that TW specifically claimed that on the 2nd, and then in our PT we had, on the 7th they had to go reread their role pm to clarify that they had a power that was linked fusion/alliance specific. You'd think they'd remember that after specifically pointing it out as a defense of someone a few days earlier.
-Cerb
Well, I'll take your word for it. I think it's something to keep in mind.
The main thing keeping me from outright calling TW scum is TSO's push against frogger at the end of D1, which seems like a very counterproductive thing to do.
Do you know Xtoxm and Mastina's flavor names? I would like to know if they both make sense, because I can't really guess two characters who would share a pt with Steven. I think I guessed Mastina's, but there's no second one in my mind.
I do know both, and Xtoxm flavor claimed as Centipeetle in thread already. You know, the monster from the first episode who Steven accidentally freed and then tamed who sacrificed himself to save Steven?
mafia mum will you pleaseee explain your scumread on us
"i have the sickest grossest feeling that even if it's my lynch today, my townflip still won't lead to a tso lynch, and then he'll find some bullshit way to reason either shooting or lynching gm tomorrow because if there's anyone who can strongarm a mislynch despite his reads or cases being proved wrong time and again it's tso"
In post 3884, T S O wrote:mafia mum will you pleaseee explain your scumread on us
Your claim is suspicious to me.
You pushed fuzzy as scum over max and titus knows damn fucking well them not voting each other means Jack shit.
Weak pushes and based on my POE I have you, cooldog and xtoxm as scum.
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
Everyone, please roleclaim and share your action history. This may help us narrow the lynch pool, and usually there is always clues in the actions by day five.
Book of Constantine (Protestant) 214: 112 - God hates you
Book of Constantine (Catholic) 214:112 - God doesn't like you
Book of Constantine (Orthodox) 214:112 - God tolerates you
N4- Allied with Sonic/ sent pizza
N3- No alliance request/ sent Mastin pizza
N2- No Alliance/ no action
N1- No alliance/ No action
RR
I don't think Xtoxm claimed Centlipettle.... the way I read it was , as a what if question.
Xtoxm
Supposing you had claimed than I would highly consider you and TW being in a third party together or maybe a second scum team together. It would confirm to me however that there was a group outside the two known parties.
In post 3886, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:Everyone, please roleclaim and share your action history. This may help us narrow the lynch pool, and usually there is always clues in the actions by day five.
In post 3886, St Constantine the Hermit wrote:Everyone, please roleclaim and share your action history. This may help us narrow the lynch pool, and usually there is always clues in the actions by day five.
I'd love to see cooldog claim
Sarcasm is just a way of saying how stupid you think someone is but in a more polite way.
This is in the best interests of town, whether this is accepted or not. It is typical to massclaim by the third day, but not on MS. The solution to the problems this game has presented, are found within the clues that emerge during the night.
Book of Constantine (Protestant) 214: 112 - God hates you
Book of Constantine (Catholic) 214:112 - God doesn't like you
Book of Constantine (Orthodox) 214:112 - God tolerates you
In post 3890, grapes wrote:Why do scum kill a watcher/double-voter over a cop?
Well one reason could be that they did it to kill two near confirmed townies who will never get lynched instead of a slot which has had some suspicion on it. Also I still had a watch to use, while TW is out of shots.
There were two night kills and Fuzzy is a motivator. That is what makes sense to me right now.
No townie has claimed to have information on why two people were killed last night. We need to continue claiming our roles and night actions, otherwise we will be in the dark here.
Book of Constantine (Protestant) 214: 112 - God hates you
Book of Constantine (Catholic) 214:112 - God doesn't like you
Book of Constantine (Orthodox) 214:112 - God tolerates you
Book of Constantine (Protestant) 214: 112 - God hates you
Book of Constantine (Catholic) 214:112 - God doesn't like you
Book of Constantine (Orthodox) 214:112 - God tolerates you
No townie has claimed to have information on why two people were killed last night. We need to continue claiming our roles and night actions, otherwise we will be in the dark here.
Nobody except cool dog will have anything to offer you. He might. He's the only role remaining in the game that hasn't claimed to us.
Also, unless there had been an extra kill at least once before, fuzzy's motivation power is irrelevant. It doesn't make sense to "motivate" an extra shot of an ability that doesn't have limited shot.
-Cerb
pedit: Ah, yes, I can confirm that that did indeed happen when you invaded us. So, did you go anywhere last night?
Yeah, the fact that the PT turns to "Rave" and my ability is to "crash the party," I am hoping that will be considered enough evidence that my real flavor is Kevin and I will be out of the lynchpool for today.
Book of Constantine (Protestant) 214: 112 - God hates you
Book of Constantine (Catholic) 214:112 - God doesn't like you
Book of Constantine (Orthodox) 214:112 - God tolerates you
*Considering that the antagonists are all obviously apart of the Crystal Diamond Authority
I agree with Niccage that flavor claims are a good idea right now. Fuzzy's claim confuses me. He is both a motivator and a pizza vendor, yet he claims cool kids. My theory I brought up earlier was that the pizza vendor would be the actual pizza guy, Kofi, who appears in about five episodes of Steven Universe, more episodes than several of the already claimed characters (plus he is pretty unique and creatively written)
My suspicion is that Fuzzy fakeclaimed, and two of the options Varsoon provided were Kofi and The Cool Kids.
Book of Constantine (Protestant) 214: 112 - God hates you
Book of Constantine (Catholic) 214:112 - God doesn't like you
Book of Constantine (Orthodox) 214:112 - God tolerates you
I didn't motivate anyone , nor could I...... if I could it would only be Sonic but he will tell you that didn't happen, I am not getting your points Hermit
Saying that I am for a repeat of character / and ability claims.
I am not going to argue wit you bc at this point its like talking to a wall. You already believe I am fake claiming and so anything I or anyone else says will be ignored by you.
Book of Constantine (Protestant) 214: 112 - God hates you
Book of Constantine (Catholic) 214:112 - God doesn't like you
Book of Constantine (Orthodox) 214:112 - God tolerates you