Open 39: Crush Nightless - Game Over! before 484
-
-
Kerplunk Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1272
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: Grûn, The Netherlands
-
-
Crub Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: June 23, 2007
- Location: Perth, Australia (GMT+8)
-
-
inHimshallibe SmartyPants
- SmartyPants
- SmartyPants
- Posts: 7070
- Joined: August 28, 2004
- Location: Music City, USA
Vote Count - Day 1
schismatized: 1 (Kerplunk)
JDodge: 1 (schismatized)
Crub: 1 (JDodge)
Not voting: 1 (spectrumvoid, Guardian, Crub)
6 alive, 4 to lynch
Working on prods and a replacement for sv.Show"I'm from Indiana. I know what you're thinking: Indiana... Mafia." - Jim Gaffigan
Mod of the continuing World of Warcraft Dungeon Run series:
Mini 1135 - Mafia in the Deadmines
Mini 1208 - Mafia in the Scarlet Monastery-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
-
-
Crub Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: June 23, 2007
- Location: Perth, Australia (GMT+8)
In short because I think a shis lynch is going to mean insta-lose. I don't care if my vote would put him at 4/3/2/1 away I'm not going to vote for the person who I think is probably the lynchee.
I don't like how kerplunk's random vote turned into a serious vote, and I especially don't like the post kerplunk made about finding the lyncher. To me he's trying to subtly confirm himself as not the lyncher.
Having said thatvote: JDodgefor accusing me of lurking in plain sight and then not posting at all.Moo?-
-
Kerplunk Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1272
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: Grûn, The Netherlands
Strange question, Guardian. If he thinks schis is the lynchee, then he won't vote for him. Duh. Is this some kind of slip-of-the-tongue?Guardian wrote:Crub, why was being afraid of Kerplunk lyncher preventing you from placing a vote? Your vote wouldn't have even -1'd schis.
And Crub, I can easily vote for JDodge right now, but I think schis is the better candidate today. This could be WIFOM, but do you think the lyncher would random vote for his target? This is totally WIFOM actually. Never mind.-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
If Crub finds schis most suspicious except for paranoia about schis being the lynchee of Kerplunk, I do not think it would be unreasonable for Crub to put schis at minus two, as it would mean that two more people would have to vote schis, neither being the lyncher, for us to instantly lose.
Basically, I think Crub is getting out of taking a stand on schis by a concern that is not greatly justified at this point.Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]-
-
Crub Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: June 23, 2007
- Location: Perth, Australia (GMT+8)
I never said I found him the most scummy. As I pointed out I don't even find him remotely scummy.
The fact that kerplunk is voting him because "Call it a feeling but the "Yay, first one"-comment seems too eager." And you're voting him because you agree with Kerplunk. Like seriously wtf
Call this a defense on schis or whatever but considering :
a) theres nothing for him to defend against and
b) he hasn't been around at all to comment for almost 2 weeks
I think I'm justified in pointing out that both yours and kerplunks vote have raised my suspicions.Moo?-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
Crub in 51 wrote:Heh. I'd vote schiz but I'm paranoid about you being the lyncher.
One statement you say you would vote him except for a "paranoid" slight possibility that Kerplunk is the lyncher. That would imply that except for your acknowledgedly paranoid concerns, you find schis the most scummy.Crub in 57 wrote:I never said I found him the most scummy. As I pointed out I don't even find him remotely scummy.
Then, you say you don't find schis even remotely scummy.
Explain how those two statements are indicative of you being internally consistent in your suspicions.Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]-
-
JDodge Accept it
- Accept it
- Accept it
- Posts: 5926
- Joined: May 6, 2005
- Location: Atop my cloud
Sorry, I've been sick.Crub wrote:In short because I think a shis lynch is going to mean insta-lose. I don't care if my vote would put him at 4/3/2/1 away I'm not going to vote for the person who I think is probably the lynchee.
I don't like how kerplunk's random vote turned into a serious vote, and I especially don't like the post kerplunk made about finding the lyncher. To me he's trying to subtly confirm himself as not the lyncher.
Having said thatvote: JDodgefor accusing me of lurking in plain sight and then not posting at all.
AT LEAST YOU AREN'T LURKING ANYMORE YAY-
-
Crub Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: June 23, 2007
- Location: Perth, Australia (GMT+8)
Since when do you have to find someone scummy to vote for them? In a stalled game like this a good old bandwagon is great for prodding discussion, I'd just prefer it if we added some pressure on someone that doesn't have 2 serious voters for no apparent reason.Guardian wrote:Crub in 51 wrote:Heh. I'd vote schiz but I'm paranoid about you being the lyncher.
One statement you say you would vote him except for a "paranoid" slight possibility that Kerplunk is the lyncher. That would imply that except for your acknowledgedly paranoid concerns, you find schis the most scummy.Crub in 57 wrote:I never said I found him the most scummy. As I pointed out I don't even find him remotely scummy.
Then, you say you don't find schis even remotely scummy.
Explain how those two statements are indicative of you being internally consistent in your suspicions.Moo?-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
Since... ever? Saying that your vote is not at all correlated with your suspicions is quite scummy... You just passed schis for me.Crub wrote:Since when do you have to find someone scummy to vote for them?
Idea -- guys, let's all vote for Crub. You don't have to find him scummy to vote for him, just do it .
unvote vote: CrubDo not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]-
-
Crub Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: June 23, 2007
- Location: Perth, Australia (GMT+8)
I didn't say my vote was not at all correlated with my suspicions. I said that you don't always have to vote someone because you think they're scummy. Voting someone to see how they react is a valid reason.Guardian wrote:
Since... ever? Saying that your vote is not at all correlated with your suspicions is quite scummy... You just passed schis for me.Crub wrote:Since when do you have to find someone scummy to vote for them?
Idea -- guys, let's all vote for Crub. You don't have to find him scummy to vote for him, just do it .
unvote vote: Crub
Voting someone because someone else felt that "They seemed too eager" in the first post on the other hand ...Moo?-
-
Kerplunk Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1272
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: Grûn, The Netherlands
Yeah, well that's maybe a bad reason. But my vote is no longer on him because of that. Basically my vote is now on him, because he is lurking.Crub wrote:Voting someone because someone else felt that "They seemed too eager" in the first post on the other hand ...
And Guardian, why should we vote for Crub now? I don't think it's a good idea to lynch someone because you said it. What if Crub is your target?
Aargh. This game is drenched in WIFOM.-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
I said we should all vote Crub now to point out the ridiculousness of Crub's reasoning that voting someone doesn't imply suspicion of them.Kerplunk wrote:And Guardian, why should we vote for Crub now? I don't think it's a good idea to lynch someone because you said it. What if Crub is your target?
I said let's all vote him, even if we aren't suspicious, to show him how stupid his statement about votes not being an expression of suspicion was.
It usually is a good idea to lynch someone because I say so, because I'm usually town and I'm usually right, but I'll let that go for now .
But the reason I voted Crub and winked twice was to show that his statement that vote =/= an expression of who you find suspicious was ridiculous.
This game is drenched in 1/2 of the players lurking, especially SV (replacement needed) and Schis (???). The mod also seems to be lurking a bit, too .Aargh. This game is drenched in WIFOM.Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]-
-
Crub Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: June 23, 2007
- Location: Perth, Australia (GMT+8)
-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
No, at that pointCrub wrote:
So at that point you thought kerplunk was scum?Guardian wrote:BandwagonVote: Kerplunk. I reallydolove your avatar, though .I rolled a dieand made a random vote.
So, first off, this is a ridiculous question to ask, except for rhetorical effect. Secondly, do you think we are still in the random stage? Because if not, then comparing how you feel votes should be treated now, and MY actions earlier, is even more ludicrous.Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]-
-
Crub Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: June 23, 2007
- Location: Perth, Australia (GMT+8)
-
-
inHimshallibe SmartyPants
- SmartyPants
- SmartyPants
- Posts: 7070
- Joined: August 28, 2004
- Location: Music City, USA
d3sisted said he'd replace in. I'm PMing him sv's role.Show"I'm from Indiana. I know what you're thinking: Indiana... Mafia." - Jim Gaffigan
Mod of the continuing World of Warcraft Dungeon Run series:
Mini 1135 - Mafia in the Deadmines
Mini 1208 - Mafia in the Scarlet Monastery-
-
d3sisted Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: August 7, 2007
- Location: Vancouver, BC
-
-
Crub Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: June 23, 2007
- Location: Perth, Australia (GMT+8)
-
-
d3sisted Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: August 7, 2007
- Location: Vancouver, BC
-
-
Crub Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: June 23, 2007
- Location: Perth, Australia (GMT+8)
-
-
Kerplunk Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1272
- Joined: July 15, 2003
- Location: Grûn, The Netherlands
Wow. Crub is at L-1 now? Funny how things run.
Could you explain your vote a little bit further, d3sisted? As you are putting someone at L-1...
I will be away this weekend. On Monday I will post again.
Therefore: I willunvote: schismaHas your mafiagame lasted for only a few days or maybe it dragged on and on and on? Check the [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=Records]Records page[/url] on the wiki to see if it is a record!-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
Hm. Kerplunk is not Crub's lyncher.
I don't particularly want to find out at this point if schisma is Crub's lyncher. I still want to hear much more from Schis and D3sisted.
unvote: Crub.
FOS: D3sisted. Coming into the game with a "random" vote to put someone at lynch -1 is extremely suspect. You have nothing better to go on at this stage in the game!?
Actually --vote: D3sisted. I really don't like that play.Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.