what?Nelly632 wrote:Actually I dont think that is a bad Ideal Gorckat....
Vote:Nelly
that is your contribution to this game?
Hmm, and odd thing to say. OJ only made one barely scummy vote. It's been established that he likely made it for no reason wich would nullify that small bit of scumminess. He wasn't technically lurking since he hasn't done anything since then. He didn't even say anything. Perhaps you're setting yourself up to vote me on less-than-strong evidence later?Elias_the_thief wrote:Thanks Paradoxombie, for replacing in this, as well as in the game I'm modding. Though I'm suspicious of you due to the fact that you are now inheriting the PM of OJ, someone I saw as fairly scummy.
That seems to me an overreaction from you. I use everything that a person has done when I consider whether they're suspcious or not. I'm setting myself up to have additional evidence for later in the game.Paradoxombie wrote:Hmm, and odd thing to say. OJ only made one barely scummy vote. It's been established that he likely made it for no reason wich would nullify that small bit of scumminess. He wasn't technically lurking since he hasn't done anything since then. He didn't even say anything. Perhaps you're setting yourself up to vote me on less-than-strong evidence later?Elias_the_thief wrote:Thanks Paradoxombie, for replacing in this, as well as in the game I'm modding. Though I'm suspicious of you due to the fact that you are now inheriting the PM of OJ, someone I saw as fairly scummy.
you understand if everyone played like you, we would not have a game, right?Nelly632 wrote:I dont think there is a Jester in this game just me... I honestly think that alot of you in this game are foolish and I want to see how far your foolishness will go...
I am TOWNIE and I am voting for myself... You all vote for me and you will be lynching a Townie on DAY ONE...
LET THE FUN BEGIN!!!
I'm suggesting that you may have taken advantage of the the fact that there was alot of suspicion on OJ to try to place it on me. The simple fact is that, despite having universal suspicion, nothing he has done indicates him being scum over town. That is all I meant. Likewise to your response, there's obviously nothing wrong with using everything a person has done to judge them, but what exactly is the original evidence would you be adding the "additional evidence" to?Elias_the_thief wrote:That seems to me an overreaction from you. I use everything that a person has done when I consider whether they're suspcious or not. I'm setting myself up to have additional evidence for later in the game.Paradoxombie wrote:Hmm, and odd thing to say. OJ only made one barely scummy vote. It's been established that he likely made it for no reason wich would nullify that small bit of scumminess. He wasn't technically lurking since he hasn't done anything since then. He didn't even say anything. Perhaps you're setting yourself up to vote me on less-than-strong evidence later?Elias_the_thief wrote:Though I'm suspicious of you due to the fact that you are now inheriting the PM of OJ,someone I saw as fairly scummy.
Well I've never lynched a mafia on day one. =(Nelly632 wrote:You all vote for me and you will be lynching a Townie on DAY ONE...
if you are a townie..and you see yourself at -1...why would you not remove your vote and help the town?Nelly632 wrote:What more content do you want... I am TOWNIE... There is your content... What would you like me to pull my vote off myself?
so you know he is at -1...but you will not remove your vote?Elias_the_thief wrote:um, yes? we would?
Para, I mean that will get evidence later in the game, and I will use the previous suspicion in later cases.
this is by far the scummiest sentences thus far in this game...Paradoxombie wrote:
Unfortunately(unless he's mafia), he's forced our hand. It's 100% necessary to lynch someone who doesn't play.
that puts him at -3 I believe