I do not like ABR's reason for lynching Adel too much, but I can partly understand that because I do tend to meta game people a lot too. I'll get back at ABR later.
For now, IGMEO the other people on the Adel wagon. Look at the circumstances in which they switched vote yesterday:
Deadscilent
In post 471, she says that she thinks Haut Boy is scum.
In post 473, she says I am not scum based on my posts about my scum history. It can be interpreted in a pro-town way by me because I was the easiest person to be lynched at that time. Yet, she did not vote for me...
In post 475, she then says Adel is high on her list too. I wonder if she'd mentioned it earlier, and her reasons for putting Adel on the top of her scum list.
Post 477, she takes her vote off Haut Boy, she says she "lets him off" that time. Why? Why let someone off if you believe they are scum?
492, she tells Patrick he is far down on her list as perspective scum. She then votes Adel without any reason.
517, calls my suspicions on Kravhen bogus, and FOSes me.
Bad as this seems, there are 2 things in this that strikes me as being indicators of townie play:
1) She did not jump on my bandwagon, when it was quite easy to mislynch me and get away with it.
2) She called my suspicions on Kravhen, who turned out to be a townie bogus... I am not sure whether a scum would have done that. It is not what she posted that matters to me, as the fact that she did post does. Her posting at that time gave people the possible opportunity to question her vote on Adel right at the end of the day, where you can make slips as scum, and due to that reason, I would not have posted at all had I been deadscilent, after my vote on Adel till day 2 were I scum.
Patrick
Was, for large parts of the game convinced that I was scum, on reasons I thought were very feeble.
In post 478, he says that he did not find my comments about my record as scum, as scummy. I would say that is pro-town, EXCEPT the fact that had a good and experienced player like Patrick said anything else at all, he would have been marked as certain scum.
In the same post, he calls Adel's jumping bandwagons scummy, and raises the possibility of me being scum with her. This, I part, I do find scummy. In fact, I find any and all suggestions of Adel being scum because of her vote hopping extremely scummy. That provides perfect opportunity for the scum to jump her the action is not actually scummy, but everyone thinks it is, and hence provides an ideal opportunity for people to jump on the Adel wagon. I am surprised Patrick would think of that kind of vote hopping as scummy.
In post 500, Patcrick votes for Adel, despite having said earlier that he finds me scummier. Why?
Erotomachia
Again, in 460 lists me as his choice for the list (but, it is interesting to note that he himself had never actually attacked me or tried to get clarification for my play any time on day 1 from me.)
In post 465, he votes me because Haut Boy and I were tied (we were, in fact NOT tied at all. I was leading by 2 votes)
Post 498, he suddenly, for some reason, gets squeamish to lynch me at deadline, and wants to cast his vote on someone else.
Post 502, he asks ABR to convince him to vote Adel instead. In 511, he switches vote to Adel for unbelievably feeble reasoning by ABR. It appears to me, that he wanted ABR to give reasons for Adel wagon, not to convince himself, but to just allow him a reason to vote Adel after having called me scummy first.
I really don't like how Erotomachia, Patrick and Deadscilent were easily convinced by ABR to change their vote to Adel for completely non existent reasons. I do not like the the way they followed ABR.
