Remember feeling some subtle townvibes and an iso there doesn't leave me shocked he's getting wagoned right now. There's certainly a lot of scummy things here. Like the blatant softing for one. I kinda feel like him attacking beer after beer going into a longwinded townread on him doesn't really scream scum, though. Like, that feels more like paranoid newbtown than anything, because as scum he has a bit more motivation to try and keep 'friends' in his pocket than push back and make them rethink their stance.
My big reservation is his disappearance, though, especially in light of a wagon forming on him. That's the most telling thing about his slot right now imo.
In post 758, Reasonably Rational wrote:What would be hypocritical of me would be to claim that I'm good enough at reading peoples play to determine your alignment based on play alone right now. That's why I'm not referencing your play itself as town or scum generally. I can attempt to ascribe town or scum motivations to the actions taken, and see if they make sense for a given alignment to take.
I'm sorry but I find it sorta tough to buy that after almost 1k posts and a week into the game a HYDRA(composing two players I'm assuming at least semi-competent at finding scum from your inflated egos here) has only one 'scumread' that you immediately backed off from and were only pushing because you wanted more role info.
Are you saying that both your heads have the exact same playstyle? No scumreads day 1 ever?
I see scum do the 'vote this person for info' or 'vote this person to get content out' all the time people. It's to look busy, and not
really
step on any toes.
And now I'm 'nullscum' at worst like it's some kind of conciliation prize or something. Newsflash, your read on me I couldn't care less man.
In post 758, Reasonably Rational wrote:If you were competent and had the intention of attempting some sort of fake hammer reaction test, as indicated in your post, you wouldn't have told everyone that one of your votes was fake.
Well, my idea was to 'hammer' once someone got to L-1 when I already had one vote on them. Which would be tough to do after proving that I can't have both votes on one wagon. Which is what you asked me to do so...
In post 769, Marquis wrote:no, i agree with the fuzzy commentary.
VOTE: fuzzy
meta wise this is completely unlike fuzzy's towngame. there at least i've seen him providing more thoughts on things - not just prompted, but seemingly out of place comments and hard pushes as well. this just looks like he's trying to look useful - and his scumgame isn't exactly the best lol
def a better bet than Sonic right now
I've seen fuzzies towngame once or twice and I just find it weird how he wasn't really interacting with anyone and kinda in his own little world his first couple posts. So I do sorta agree with this. And I'm not sure that him getting into it more now is a result of me saying something about it, which could be because apparently he isoed me multiple times or just because he's got some pressure now.
In post 796, MaxwellPuckett wrote:
Bins bare-bones response to my question aside (they voted Cage after Cage got a vote.. come on, why is Cage even in this list?), I appreciate grapes trying to get some focus in here.
He's one of my weaker scumreads. I was sorta withholding stronger judgment than that because like you said I wanted to see his followup. And I agree bins piggybacking my thoughts there and throwing a vote on before he had a chance to come in and do it doesn't look great.
In post 796, MaxwellPuckett wrote:
Tunnel: Grapes, why is tunnel in here? I haven't seen you suspecting him. I'm not sure what you mean by 'white minivan', either, but you used it in context with Tunnel's alliance powers.
Admittedly another weak read. But I don't usually like full or at least BIG claims really early and my knee jerk reaction was yea this is some complete bullshit or at least too good to be true. Hence the white minivan not actually selling ice cream but nightmares instead. I think coupled with the [bad things happen to scum that target us] and the [our role is totes broken for town] was laying it on awfully thick. If I'm even remembering the claim correctly, which I may not be because I didn't really read into the intricacies of it all that much, it did make my suspicious bone tingle. Along with that a few plays they've made here and there.
In post 796, MaxwellPuckett wrote:
Skybird: I defended their actions from Marquis earlier, and right now they're kinda nulltown. I guess they can be in the lynchpile but a lot of the motivation for voting Sky appears to be 'I don't
feel
like they're being genuine', and not a lot of actual evidence. Also I feel they are being genuine so make of that what you will.
I think there's been a lot more driveby townreads on them than the few scumreads that I can recall right now. Some of the scumreads were actually substantiated. I can't recall one townread that was.
In post 798, Ricastle wrote:This game is a fucking mess...too many people looking too scummy. Fuzzy and Sonic X are apparently points of contention so I don't think anything's going to get done there. However, I'm pretty sure little to no people would have an objection to, say, a radmann or a Ra9in9 lynch, right?
VOTE: radmann9
That's where you and I differ it seems. Resistance makes me want to push harder.
In post 852, Trench Warfare wrote:Can you rephrase this, though? I'm not sure if your tone is off or not here because I don't fully understand it.
Whenever someone gives "i see a townmindset" as a reason for townreading someone my eyes roll back into my brain, so the sarcasm might have been the tone you were sensing or something.
It's just a really easy thing to say that sounds like it means something when it actually doesn't, especially when not elaborated on.
