Mini 485: Formula One (Game Over)

[Zindaras]

Woah. That's the fourth vote on SPAG. I don't really like the speed there.

[JDodge]

Vote Count:

SPAG - 4 (discordian algorithm, SirWario, IH, deadscilent)
deadscilent - 3 (Polter, KaleiÐoscøpe, pulsewidth)
Zindaras - 1 (Paradoxombie)
SirWario - 1 (ChaosOmega)
ChaosOmega - 1 (ojpower)
discordian algorithm - 1 (Zindaras)

Not voting (1): SPAG

7 to lynch.

[SPAG]

Yes my bandwagon certainly grew very quicky. Ah well people can do what they want, however, at some point i'm gonna go through and take notes on everyone, try and work out who i think is mafia.

I seem to get this in all the games i'm in, people don't like my style because it's different.

[pulsewidth]

Playtime is ovah!

unvote: deadscilent

SPAG's reactions are somewhat scummy, but I'm not gonna put him at -2 already just for that.

deadscilent, what's with the FOS and vote in the same post?

[SPAG]

deadscilent, what's with the FOS and vote in the same post?

I was wondering that also, isn't the idea of a FOS to show that your are suspicious of that person but are not overly convinced its worth a vote yet.

[deadscilent]

lol I unno, I felt like putting in to say my vote can change, that Im not sure but Im puting my vote there for the time being.

because my other vote was random, I hate random votes -.-' lol

[pulsewidth]

That is a bunch of nonsense, madam. Scummy nonsense.

Vote: deadscilent

[SPAG]

FOS : deadscilent

For the following reasons:

1. Not being around at the beginning, whos to know that she was'nt just lurking and waiting for the right 'opportunity' to post.

2. Her FOS followed straight by a vote on me

3. Her rubbish reasoning for her FOS - Vote on me

I do not think these reasons alone are enough to put her at -1, though i will certainly be keeping an eye on her!

[deadscilent]

I made a newb mistake, its always fun, it made sense to me but not to you. Oh wow, Im now scum? O.o

Right?

And SPAG, I was doing house stuff, I just freaking moved give me a break.

[Zindaras]

Deadscilent is at 3 votes, with 7 to lynch. A vote now wouldn't bring her even close to lynch.

[Zindaras]

EBWOP: As far as the "who's to know she wasn't lurking" thing, that's crap. Who's to know she was? Being gone is a null tell, it happens to everyone.

[SPAG]

Deadscilent is at 3 votes, with 7 to lynch. A vote now wouldn't bring her even close to lynch.

I read it wrong, she had 3 votes on her at the vote count, since then i counted two votes on her, thinking she was now on 5.

However pulsewidth had already been counted, and both the votes after the VC were by him.

FOS

for being too eager to vote deadscilent as soon as he thought she had made a mistake. Though i have to agree i picked this 'mistake' up on my radar.

[SPAG]

EBWOP: As far as the "who's to know she wasn't lurking" thing, that's crap. Who's to know she was? Being gone is a null tell, it happens to everyone.

what does EBWOP mean?

and yes it's not a reason by itself, but a

possibity

[pulsewidth]

EBWOP means Edit by way of post.

And the lurking is a non-tell, man. The game just started today. Noone waits for an opportunity to post in the RANDOM VOTING STAGE.

[SPAG]

EBWOP means Edit by way of post.

And the lurking is a non-tell, man. The game just started today. Noone waits for an opportunity to post in the RANDOM VOTING STAGE.

Mneh i spose you to are right. Going to reread through the thread and i will post up my thoughts.

[deadscilent]

Im curious as to why you are trying so hard to put the blame on others when you are suspected.

[SPAG]

Im curious as to why you are trying so hard to put the blame on others when you are suspected.

Because i am trying to work out who the mafia are. Just because people are suspecting me doesn't mean i can't try and figure out who the mafia are.

That post just makes you look suspect, as your trying to get me to not suspect anyone and thus keep the suspisions on myself rather than elsewhere, what are you worried about?

[discordian algorithm]

SPAG's three other games on Mafiascum


Mini 466 His first post was made on Aug 01


Newbie 410: Beach began Aug 01


Mini 484 began Aug 05

Of the 67 posts in this game SPAG made 21.

SPAG is a scummy active player I would like to see at -1 to lynch.

[discordian algorithm]

EBWOP:

SPAG's three other games on Mafiascum:

Mini 466 His first post was made on Aug 01

Newbie 410: Beach began Aug 01

Mini 484 began Aug 05

Of the 67 posts in this game SPAG made 21.

SPAG is a scummy active player I would like to see at -1 to lynch.

[pulsewidth]

Those are all open games, so it's not like he can comment on his actions there. Being active is not a scumtell. The fact that you would like to see him at -1 IS a scumtell.

Unvote, Vote: discordian algorithm

[SPAG]

FOS on discordian algorithm

Jumped on me about my vote hopping during the random vote phase. Does this really matter? As in none of these 3 random votes i held no real suspision therefore even i was scum and my scum parter was confirmed / killed i wouldn't really be able to say, hey i wa suspisious of them earlier 'in the random phase lol' therefore holds no real distancing effect.

Also is trying to spread the word that i am a stupid / thick mafia, trying to convince people to put their votes onto me.

Brought up the fact that i vote hopped in the random phase AGAIN in post 46. You'd already made your point, were not enough people following you for your liking?

Also wants to see me at -1 lynch. For what reason? because i am active? want all the town to be lurkers so they get nowhere? Or, if you are mafia, you know i am town, therefore you want me to get to -1 so that i will have to role claim. Shame i won't be doing that, this is a theme game so all i will need to do is reveal my character. Also used references to my other games, i play in a similar style all the way through, i am sure in all my games i have a scum role i am yet to even receive one.

[SPAG]

Infact, reading back over again what i have written, i believe it is enough to take my vote. Your pushing really hard for my lynching DA, and i have no idea why. Maybe counting on the fact that 'people may not like my reactions'?

vote : discordian algorithm

[discordian algorithm]

Shame i won't be doing that, this is a theme game so all i will need to do is reveal my character. Also used references to my other games, i play in a similar style all the way through, i am sure in all my games i have a scum role i am yet to even receive one.

I will still be happy to see SPAG at lynch -1. Thanks for your vote, SPAG.

[SPAG]

Shame i won't be doing that, this is a theme game so all i will need to do is reveal my character. Also used references to my other games, i play in a similar style all the way through, i am sure in all my games i have a scum role i am yet to even receive one.

I will still be happy to see SPAG at lynch -1. Thanks for your vote, SPAG.

why?

[JDodge]

I'm going to point to the new, shiny (and bolded) rule 16. Any further references to ongoing games will result in replacement.