In case anyone skims over the rest of this, here is a must-see from Muerrto's latest post.
muerrto, a few posts ago wrote:
But IF you believe he's a cop then we're obviously not scumbuddies and you have no case on me because I wouldn't be feeding him lines.
Muerrto, in his last post wrote:
Claiming my argument is WIFOM after we saw how much people hated WIFOM is just a tactic to divert votes onto me. Again, read up on WIFOM.
If I'd said something like 'scum wouldn't feed lines to town' that would be WIFOM. But I didn't.
This speaks for itself. Muerrto can't pull a noob card like D_O. I'd like to see him try and get himself out of this latest megascumtell.
Please read up on WIFOM before you respond again. This isn't it. You said that I was feeding my scum buddy lines. You've been 100% convinced of that since day 2. That's been your ONLY case against me.
There are some small scummy things you have done, but they are soft scumtells. I didn't feel the need to mention them unless specifically asked because they can also apply to townies in a lot of cases. The only time feeding people lines occurs is if the feeder knows the alignment of the person he is feeding. There was no n0, so you couldn't have investigated D_O. D_O didn't claim mason; he claimed cop. That leaves scum. Scum can either be doing it to link themselves to a townie so they can look more pro-town from defending him after a lynch or they can be doing it with a scum to seriously stop him from being lynched.
Only recently, like 1 page back did you change that to say that maybe I was scum linking myself to DO and that maybe he was innocent. But you were STILL saying you were 100% convinced you had all 3 scum. So much so that you said you had NO other suspects at all. This is contradictory.
Not so--I was merely mentioning other possibilities, in case I happened to be wrong. Also, I never said I was "100%" anything. I said I was very sure, extremely sure, and the like, but never 100% sure. That's why I admitted to the small, finite chance that you could have been tying yourself to D_O. It seems you actually were.
Claiming my argument is WIFOM after we saw how much people hated WIFOM is just a tactic to divert votes onto me. Again, read up on WIFOM. If I'd said something like 'scum wouldn't feed lines to town' that would be WIFOM. But I didn't.
I said YOUR case against me was that I was scum feeding my SCUMBUDDY lines. Now that DO's claimed cop and you unvoted him, how am I a scumbuddy feeding lines again?
I also mentioned you could have been scum trying to link to a townie.
Khelvaster wrote:Would you vote for a claimed cop in a closed setup without a counterclaim? I certainly wouldn't.
Now this is nice. You can look above your post and see that I already stated that same thing. So trying to state that in a way that sounds like I would vote a claimed cop? Not gonna work. I even said I don't believe the claim but I'm not voting a claimed cop.
Yeah, but you definitely shouldn't say that me unvoting the claimed cop makes me scummy or hypocritical in any way. That is pure bullshit.
You suspect strictly on an OMGUS basis, we saw it with DO, me, and Nell. You have no evidence or reason behind your votes other than 'since they're attacking me they must be scum'. Since townies don't know each other this argument is null. BUT scum know who the townies are. And your constant OMGUS voting definitely spells scum.
I'm pretty sure you, D_O, and Nell haven't been the only three people this game who have voted for me. As I have said before, D_O has been consistantly scummy, you have been feeding lines (and now incredibly hypocritical and illogical,) and Nell seemed to be capitalizing on my BW by posting loaded questions for me to answer.
Lag actually does exist in real life. For proof, look no further than Jesus: When he died, it took him three *days* to respawn.
.
