Open 38 - Jester Mafia 12p (Game Over!) - before 484

[somestrangeflea]

/confirm

[somestrangeflea]

Numbered 1-11, top to bottom.

Original Roll String: 1d11

1 11-Sided Dice: (7) = 7

[somestrangeflea]

Vote: Nightfall

You try and argue with dice...

[somestrangeflea]

Unvote, Vote: TCS

For using IE

6

!

Get with the times! =D

[somestrangeflea]

The thing about Mafia, is that if you're going to tell us that you have some big secret master plan that you aren't going to tell us, one of two things has to happen:

1. It better be an incredibly good plan which gives results quickly.
2. You're going to have to get used to a large number of people doubting your motives as a Townie

And I personally think that Number 2 is more likely...

[somestrangeflea]

Alive. Currently awaiting a post from ojpower, and possible

prods for JDodge, Nightfall and spectruvoid

please, under the criteria, that, AFAICT, they haven't posted for a week.

[somestrangeflea]

For those of you who currently don’t have a vote on Ben, I’d like to hear what your take on him is. Why or why isn’t he the lynch for today?

Why are you convinced he's scum? More importantly, why did you ignore the possibility of ben being the Jester?

[somestrangeflea]

In a game where you are "READING" people's comments for you to bring up the cop (I don't care in WHAT context) without some smiley face or LOL. So don't say it's being stupid or whatever, I read your post, that's what you said, period.

You don't care about context? Well then...

I'm a newbie scum

By your logic, that's a pretty damning post you made against youself! Care to explain? =D

And that proves the importance of context.

[somestrangeflea]

In a game where you are "READING" people's comments for you to bring up the cop (I don't care in WHAT context) without some smiley face or LOL. So don't say it's being stupid or whatever, I read your post, that's what you said, period.

You don't care about context? Well then...

I'm a newbie scum

By your logic, that's a pretty damning post you made against youself! Care to explain? =D

And that proves the importance of context.

You have GOT to be f'ing kidding me? You took three words out of a complete sentence that I wrote and are calling me out on that? He wrote the exact quote that I posted, go back and look. That is gotta be one of your dumbest arguments ever. You quoted three words out of an entire paragraph that I posted, seriously what a waste of an argument.

Well, if you think that Jimmy was really fishing for the Cop, then you must think that I think IE6 users are scummy.

[somestrangeflea]

I'm explaining why I quoted what I quoted and than ssf comes on and quotes two lines of my paragraph, COMPLETELY two different things.

Well, you claimed that you don't care about context, why should I?

You seem to miss the point that SSF 100% misquoted me to make me look scummy.

No, I misquoted you to prove the point that context is important. I am not going to attempt a lynch on you because you "claimed scum", since I do not actually believe that you claimed scum. I figured you would've realised that from the smiley face I posted, which you seem to believe has to be on every, single non-serious post.

[somestrangeflea]

Apologies for not posting for a while.

Reading through d3sisted's posts, I can see why people are voting for him, [but to be honest, reading through his posts he seems a tad too "forward" to be Scum, possibly Jester-ish. There seems to be something about the tone of his posts which, to me, seems out of place to be scummy...

[somestrangeflea]

Wo-uh... I mean, Egads! Numen's PBPA analysis on d3sisted was, in my opinion, fantastic.

As for the Max miscount, I have been in games where I've accidently miscounted and been correctly recognised as doing so. However, it's just as easy to "accidently" miscount, so I'm not reading very deeply into that, TBH...

[somestrangeflea]

Wo-uh... I mean, Egads! Numen's PBPA analysis on d3sisted was, in my opinion, fantastic.

Excuse me? I've managed to respond to each of those points individually in my defense, effectively reducing his analysis to ashes. There's no base in it any more, there's nothing "fantastic" about it.

And, in turn, he responded to each of those points in a way which, IMO, more convincing. You made no response to that post though...

[somestrangeflea]

Wo-uh... I mean, Egads! Numen's PBPA analysis on d3sisted was, in my opinion, fantastic.

Excuse me? I've managed to respond to each of those points individually in my defense, effectively reducing his analysis to ashes. There's no base in it any more, there's nothing "fantastic" about it.

And, in turn, he responded to each of those points in a way which, IMO, more convincing. You made no response to that post though...

The fact that you have still refused to respond to either this or Numen's post I refer to prompts me to

FoS: d3sisted

I'm not putting you within hammering (or self-hammering, as the case may be) distance yet...

[somestrangeflea]

I am getting

HUGE

Jester vibes from Max. His posts seem to be trying to push a d3sisted lynch, but it seems as though he's actually trying to make his case on d3sisted seem poor.

FoJS: Max

[somestrangeflea]

Fantastic play from d3sisted.

Does this mean that the other 11 of us have been Endgamed?