In post 1848, T S O wrote:Why would you vote Kitz?
Because she questioned a cop Inno on her.
In post 1844, dragonspawn wrote:In post 1805, RadiantCowbells wrote:Well, that was a solid night.
Also a possibility that Blue team kills odd nights, Red kills evens.
If anyone needs me, VOTE: laladuck
first, why would wake give one team that disadvantage?
second, how do you know the other team is blue? Or did I miss something?
In post 1851, RadiantCowbells wrote:In post 1844, dragonspawn wrote:In post 1805, RadiantCowbells wrote:Well, that was a solid night.
Also a possibility that Blue team kills odd nights, Red kills evens.
If anyone needs me, VOTE: laladuck
first, why would wake give one team that disadvantage?
second, how do you know the other team is blue? Or did I miss something?
First, because it would then be compensated for in the form of increasing PRs on one team while lowering the KPN.
Second, I don't. But it's a fair assumption.
In post 1855, Titus wrote:Mod:Are best friends normal or would they require using the "not normal slots" you have.
In post 1830, Kitz wrote:In post 1828, House wrote:In the neighborhood, I said it's almost as futile for me to read you as it is for you to read me.
There was no "protective" bullshit that Kitz is spewing. She's being lying scum.
You wrote that it was futile to read SW, one way or another, with not even a single input on the thoughts of what you were asked about.
"trying to read SW is about as futile as her trying to read me"...So "Her" being me, Kitz,but you still wrote that reading SW is futile.
In post 1835, SilverWolf wrote:In post 1828, House wrote:
In the neighborhood, I said it's almost as futile for me to read you as it is for you to read me.
There was no "protective" bullshit that Kitz is spewing. She's being lying scum.
Who else is in your hood again? If they can confirm Kitz is lying, then I'm fine voting for her. Fabricating reads is scummy as shit.
In post 1859, Titus wrote:House, Kitz is scum. I agree. So is RC.
I like BooKitty as town though and Egg as scum picking between the other two.
In post 1857, House wrote:Her, being Silverwolf.
In post 1828, House wrote:In the neighborhood, I said it's almost as futile for me to read you as it is for you to read me.
In post 1862, House wrote:Too late, scum. I'm pretty sure everybody else knew exactly what I meant, as SilverWolf was the topic of conversation.
NOT YOU.
In post 1805, RadiantCowbells wrote:Also a possibility that Blue team kills odd nights, Red kills evens.
In post 1863, Kitz wrote:
Because I'm a complete fucktard and misread something, I won't bother House/Titus/SW and I'll just ignore them for the moment.
In post 1805, RadiantCowbells wrote:Also a possibility that Blue team kills odd nights, Red kills evens.
Moving my vote, for this reason.
This is Informative, how does one know that one is Blue?
VOTE: RadiantCowbells
In post 1863, Kitz wrote:In post 1862, House wrote:Too late, scum. I'm pretty sure everybody else knew exactly what I meant, as SilverWolf was the topic of conversation.
NOT YOU.
You're the one who keeps saying you can't read me, so I assumed it was me as a reference.
Anyway, I'm pondering if I should just resign, because my ability of English is so bad it leads to me getting the center of attention in Every Single Game.
In post 1855, Titus wrote:Mod:Are best friends normal or would they require using the "not normal slots" you have.
In post 1866, Titus wrote:@House, let's force scum to lynch scum or scum claim. After all, you didn't commute but a doctor healed you and you will be commuting tonight right? (Town motivated wifom)
Kitz and RC, it should not matter as both are scum.
Blue is just as common as any other color to describe a second scum team. Orange is another. Blue is very particular and off.
In post 1867, House wrote:Care to explain how I protected SilverWolf? Because I'm still not seeing how you pulled that out of thin air, even if you are telling the truth about thinking I was referring to you by "her".
Stating I protected SilverWolf by saying I couldn't read you makes no more sense than saying I was protecting her by saying I couldn't read her. Or any less sense.
The conclusion does not follow.
In post 1868, Wake1 wrote:In post 1855, Titus wrote:Mod:Are best friends normal or would they require using the "not normal slots" you have.
Please read Game OP and Normal Game wiki page.
In post 1870, Kitz wrote:In post 1867, House wrote:Care to explain how I protected SilverWolf? Because I'm still not seeing how you pulled that out of thin air, even if you are telling the truth about thinking I was referring to you by "her".
Stating I protected SilverWolf by saying I couldn't read you makes no more sense than saying I was protecting her by saying I couldn't read her. Or any less sense.
The conclusion does not follow.
Because you didn't say anything further on the case. Presented quotes, that something's weird, then you're asked about it, and all you give is that you can't give a player read and that's about it?
I would've given a read about the quotes, and why they stand out so much, before commentating if it's adequate scummy or not.
Considering you're one of the experienced players, that struck me as odd.
That I think is scummy. Sue me.
In post 1872, House wrote:Another Kitz!scum lie.
In post 1871, Titus wrote:In post 1868, Wake1 wrote:In post 1855, Titus wrote:Mod:Are best friends normal or would they require using the "not normal slots" you have.
Please read Game OP and Normal Game wiki page.
Ty. Cc please.