In post 424, Venmar wrote:Inside jokes aren't really cool as titles
Yes, avatar observances and username puns are the way to go.
In post 424, Venmar wrote:Inside jokes aren't really cool as titles
In post 426, Kublai Khan wrote:Hell, the majority of titles are inside jokes.
In post 425, Kublai Khan wrote:In post 424, Venmar wrote:Inside jokes aren't really cool as titles
Yes, avatar observances and username puns are the way to go.
In post 415, SleepyKrew wrote:I don't have a problem with policy discussions in this thread right now. I'll let you know if I start feeling like they're a problem.
In post 427, sthar8 wrote:In post 426, Kublai Khan wrote:Hell, the majority of titles are inside jokes.
I'm pretty surealltitles are inside jokes.
In post 430, Jingle wrote:In post 427, sthar8 wrote:In post 426, Kublai Khan wrote:Hell, the majority of titles are inside jokes.
I'm pretty surealltitles are inside jokes.
Nom changing thread title to "Dance of the Inside Joker: Pale Moonlight Edition"
In post 428, Venmar wrote:In post 425, Kublai Khan wrote:In post 424, Venmar wrote:Inside jokes aren't really cool as titles
Yes, avatar observances and username puns are the way to go.
Har Har?
Nobody Special wrote:In post 430, Jingle wrote:In post 427, sthar8 wrote:In post 426, Kublai Khan wrote:Hell, the majority of titles are inside jokes.
I'm pretty surealltitles are inside jokes.
Nom changing thread title to "Dance of the Inside Joker: Pale Moonlight Edition"
2nd
In post 437, DeathRowKitty wrote:blatant fairy bias
In post 424, Venmar wrote:Inside jokes aren't really cool as titles
In post 440, Jordan_Downey wrote:In post 437, DeathRowKitty wrote:blatant fairy bias
Sure, man. But that's not really a problem.
In post 443, esuriospiritus wrote:In post 440, Jordan_Downey wrote:In post 437, DeathRowKitty wrote:blatant fairy bias
Sure, man. But that's not really a problem.
If two people are roughly equally deserving of a title and they're roughly equally good titles (by whatever metrics we're using to determine that; not the point) and skrew can approve one and reject another based on what clique they're in, yes, that's a problem.
In post 440, Jordan_Downey wrote:In post 437, DeathRowKitty wrote:blatant fairy bias
Sure, man. But that's not really a problem.
SKrew has earned the title of Inside Joke Fairy, and it's up to him to use that according to his best judgement. Sure that means titles he likes will get pushed through. But who cares? That's the only reward he gets for his contribution to the site here, and far be it from me to tell him how to abuse that power.
Keep on keeping on, SKrew. We stand united under your reign of awful tyranny.
~Jingle
Everyone else can bitch, moan, bribe, threaten, throw hissy fits, etc. It doesn't matter.
In post 444, Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:I thought Cheery Dog was genuinely called Kayak, just fyi. This whole clique stuff is silly; 4 people who definitely aren't part of some SK-clique supported the title.
In post 447, Psyche wrote:
Everyone else can bitch, moan, bribe, threaten, throw hissy fits, etc. It doesn't matter.
How can you be so short-sighted? What's even the point of having this titling process instead of others if everyone else is bitching and moaning over it? Whether anything happening in this and related threads are worthwhile depends almost totally on whether it makes community happier or not.