I didn't convince anyone to vote Nano, I felt the claim was fake and wasn't the only one, I'm not taking the brunt for this lynch. As far as AmeliaLi, what does she have to do with anything at this point? She isn't lynched, she's still alive. Being the one to hammer doesn't finger me guilty, I'm sure not going to justify myself to you, one of the scummiest players in this game so far.klopyrev wrote:Don't throw your guilt onto someone else, ryan. Don't bring attention away from yourself. You were the one to hammer. You were the one who was convincing people to hammer on AmeliaLi before.
Mini 466 - Game Over
-
-
ryan Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3593
- Joined: April 19, 2007
- Location: Iowa
[i]Please remove your head from your ass before you vote.[/i]-
-
ryan Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3593
- Joined: April 19, 2007
- Location: Iowa
Go back through the vote counts right before Nano was lynched and tell me how you "don't buy" my claim. I went back through and made a miscalculation on my vote count, you can call me a liar if you choose, but I didn't miscalculate on purpose. Klopy is still on my radar but I feel strongly that Lowell is now our choice, if you re-read through the game you'll see why I feel that way, it's right there in black and white.curiouskarmadog wrote:I also do not buy ryan’s (I miscounted the votes statement)..then the vote on Lowell? what happened to klop? Are you hoping for another quick lynch?
Fos Ryan[i]Please remove your head from your ass before you vote.[/i]-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
you mean beside Lowell, who your vote is on?
ryan wrote:
I didn't convince anyone to vote Nano, I felt the claim was fake and wasn't the only one, I'm not taking the brunt for this lynch. As far as AmeliaLi, what does she have to do with anything at this point? She isn't lynched, she's still alive. Being the one to hammer doesn't finger me guilty, I'm sure not going to justify myself to you, one of the scummiest players in this game so far.klopyrev wrote:Don't throw your guilt onto someone else, ryan. Don't bring attention away from yourself. You were the one to hammer. You were the one who was convincing people to hammer on AmeliaLi before.-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
Please provide posts (and post numbers) before the lynch stating why you feel Lowell deserves a lynch. Then I can show you 5x that where you were going after klop. I can also show that you hammered a Doc...I think you chose Lowell because you knew I (and others) highly suspected him. I think it is interesting how you and Gatorguy both voted Nano so quickly for a lynch. I think it is interesting how you and Gatorguy are the first two votes for Lowell now, when pre lynch you pushed heavily for an Amel and klop lynch…..pre lynch I felt Lowell was the scummiest…not now…ryan wrote:
Go back through the vote counts right before Nano was lynched and tell me how you "don't buy" my claim. I went back through and made a miscalculation on my vote count, you can call me a liar if you choose, but I didn't miscalculate on purpose. Klopy is still on my radar but I feel strongly that Lowell is now our choice, if you re-read through the game you'll see why I feel that way, it's right there in black and white.
Unvote Jester..FoS Jester….I would love to hear from him at this point. AndFoS Gatorguy, what are YOUR reasons you feel Lowell should be lynched in Day 2
If you stuck by your hammer and said, "yeah, I thought Nano was scummy and deserved the lynch", I might have believed you…but for someone who picks apart everyone’s posts in detail, I find your excuse of a miscount and out and out LIE…
Vote Ryan-
-
Numenorean7 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 597
- Joined: April 27, 2007
- Location: Arizona, USA
@ryan
You haven't cleared this up yet:
Also, are you saying you missed this:In post 593, I wrote:ryan, I don't get your post 589. It sounds like you are accusing Lowell of flip-flopping, but that doesn't make sense. Are you accusing him of pushing the lynch? If so, I don't think anyone can be blamed for lynching Nano. Everyone believed that his claim was fake.In post 556, I wrote:You're claiming doc at L-3?Political Correctness offends me.-
-
Sir Tornado Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2255
- Joined: May 17, 2007
CKD: I genuinely missed Num7 voting for Nano. I thought he was after Klop at that time (although he had mentioned earlier that he would go for either Klop or Nano). I got that impression because Num7 was attacking Klop for some time before I made that post.
And, in I would say that Nano and Lowell were not quite similar on D1. Nano was here, but he wasn't posting. Lowell was away, due to which he was not posting. But, now, I think the "away" thing is really getting a bit out of hand. Lowell, please post or ask for a replacement or be prepared to get lynched, because you have a lot to answer here.
You could start with explaining your (opportunistic) vote on Nano.
And ryan, you still haven't explained your WIFOM comment on D1, which has been pointed out by no less than 3 people.I'm back!-
-
ryan Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3593
- Joined: April 19, 2007
- Location: Iowa
I felt the claim was bogus and that is why I went with my vote. I'm a pro town player who made a mistake with my vote count on Nano and am willing to take the heat for it, although I'm not taking 100% blame. It was a screwup and not somebody looking for opportunity to lynch a townie. We have ZERO confirmed scum at this time (although I do believe unless I'm misreading this person's posts that we do have one scum who has been confirmed by an "investigation") I see Lowell as scum who came out of hiding, dropped a vote and than vanished. I still believe Kloppy to be scum along with Lowell, AmeliaLi for now in my eyes is looking like pro town, I'm not 100% sure on the 3rd right now but after our night session I feel confident about 2 scum.curiouskarmadog wrote:
Please provide posts (and post numbers) before the lynch stating why you feel Lowell deserves a lynch. Then I can show you 5x that where you were going after klop. I can also show that you hammered a Doc...I think you chose Lowell because you knew I (and others) highly suspected him. I think it is interesting how you and Gatorguy both voted Nano so quickly for a lynch. I think it is interesting how you and Gatorguy are the first two votes for Lowell now, when pre lynch you pushed heavily for an Amel and klop lynch…..pre lynch I felt Lowell was the scummiest…not now…ryan wrote:
Go back through the vote counts right before Nano was lynched and tell me how you "don't buy" my claim. I went back through and made a miscalculation on my vote count, you can call me a liar if you choose, but I didn't miscalculate on purpose. Klopy is still on my radar but I feel strongly that Lowell is now our choice, if you re-read through the game you'll see why I feel that way, it's right there in black and white.
Unvote Jester..FoS Jester….I would love to hear from him at this point. AndFoS Gatorguy, what are YOUR reasons you feel Lowell should be lynched in Day 2
If you stuck by your hammer and said, "yeah, I thought Nano was scummy and deserved the lynch", I might have believed you…but for someone who picks apart everyone’s posts in detail, I find your excuse of a miscount and out and out LIE…
Vote Ryan[i]Please remove your head from your ass before you vote.[/i]-
-
ryan Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3593
- Joined: April 19, 2007
- Location: Iowa
Yes I'm accusing of him of coming out of hiding, dropping a vote and than vanishing. I believe at least two scum were on the Nano bandwagon.Numenorean7 wrote:@ryan
You haven't cleared this up yet:
Also, are you saying you missed this:In post 593, I wrote:ryan, I don't get your post 589. It sounds like you are accusing Lowell of flip-flopping, but that doesn't make sense. Are you accusing him of pushing the lynch? If so, I don't think anyone can be blamed for lynching Nano. Everyone believed that his claim was fake.In post 556, I wrote:You're claiming doc at L-3?[i]Please remove your head from your ass before you vote.[/i]-
-
Jester Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 382
- Joined: May 4, 2007
- Location: Connecticut, USA
OK, want to open by apologizing to Nano. I was completely wrong about him. All I can say in my own defense is that he was playing very suspiciously, and as I said, role-claiming doctor is absolutely never a good idea. The avalanche really came down on him after that, but again, I accept my share of the blame (which is a large one). He was playing very suspiciously, and given the same style of play, I'd probably vote the same way again. I'll have to think about that before my hext game; it just never occured to me that the doctor would play by making so many zero-content posts. It certainly isn't the way I've played when I've been the doctor.
Mitigating that, though, I'm glad my guess that Fireball was a tonwie was on. That makes me feel slightly better.
I was instrumental in finding mafia very early in two prior games, once on day one, once on day two, and was immediately night-killed thereafter. This felt like it was gonna be a similar situation. I wanted to get my suspicions about Lowell out there in case that was going to happen, plus my comments about your play style in my 582. I haven't survived a full game of Mafiascum yet. I'm always either lynched or night-killed, probably because I'm so vocal.ryan wrote:I'd also like more info from Jester, who thought he for sure was going to be night killed (which I found interesting)
Yeah. :/ That definitely started an avalanche, like I said. Jumped from L-3 to dead in something like two hours, which in this particular (incredibly slow-paced) game was very unusual and a little scary.Numenorean7 wrote:Poor Nano. If he hadn't claimed, he probably wouldn't have been lynched anytime soon. Perhaps he wouldn't have been lynched at all.
Yep, pointed out the same thing in my 569. He still hasn't answered the flood of questions directed at him.Numenorean7 wrote:In particular, I find the way Lowell appeared just after Nano claimed to be very scummy. It seems to be evidence of true lurking, not just inactivity forced by real life.
See above. It didn't even occur to me that the doctor might protect me, honestly. I'm not the cop, and I would have hoped that the doctor was looking for the cop.Numenorean7 wrote:If he's pro-town, why not let the real doctor decide who to protect? I would like to hear some comment/explanation from Jester on this.
There was nothing to get from Nano's posts. Like I said, he pretty much said nothing in them. As for Fireball, in my experience, the first night-kill by experienced scum (which it looks like is what we're after here) is pretty much random. The only thing that stick out at me regarding Fireball's posts were his defense of CKD in his 417 and 449 and his attack on Lowell in his 449.Numenorean7 wrote:Now that Nano and MFB are confirmed town, I've looked back over their posts to try and get some leads. I didn't get a whole lot.
Incredibly not true. I added Lowell to my suspect list in my post 98 based on a pointer from Numenorean, put a FOS on him in my 142 and 371, and commented extensively about my suspcions of him in my 569. He's definitely on my suspect list, as are you. My vote for Nano in my post 70 was intended to "wake him up" and make him start participating in the game. It was what he said (or didn't say) after that that made him my #1 suspect.curiouskarmadog wrote:Post 70?!? Jester does a coin toss between two “quiet” people Nano and myself..and his vote never changed. Interesting. It also should be noted that Jester thinks Nano and I are quiet at this point (even though I had several posts) He does not put Lowell in this category even though the only posts Lowell has provided were two voting posts with no explanations.
Also incredibly not true. My post 98curiouskarmadog wrote:Post 98: Jester mentions he has no concrete opinion on Nano or ST (again he leaves Lowell off this list)openswith me putting Lowell on my suspect list.
Also not true. I invite anyone who's interested in this accusation to read my 212. Here's a link to it:curiouskarmadog wrote:212: Jester mentions again that Nano is quiet. Requests that Indy be replaced. Jester is “comfortable” with a lynch on Nano or myself. Jester feels that Nano deserves a lynch for being quiet, but Lowell has not said enough to form an opinion??? How much more content has Lowell posted than Nano at this point? To answer your question: NONE!
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... &start=212
By 212, it wasn't that Nano had said nothing. Nano had said things, but they were either zero content posts or suspicious things. As I stated later, I found his 154 particularly suspicious. On that same day, Lowell had said he was going to participate by creating a long post, a promise that he broke. His breaking of that promise caused me to add a FOS on him in my 371. Meanwhile, you have never answered or addressed the suspicions I raised aboutyouin my very same 212. Would you care to do that now?
Virtually every sentence in this summation is a lie. Here is a link to my 371 for those that want to read it:curiouskarmadog wrote:373: Jester: References me as being an evil genius…says that if he had two votes I would get the second. States Nano is the most scummiest player here for lurking (100% sure).90% sure I am scum. Gut feeling is Indy is first time scum. He would like Lowell to actually post something (but he is doing the exact same thing Nano is, interesting). He think ryan, Num, and Fireball townies.
http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopi ... &start=371
Again, I voted for Nano and held my vote therenotbecause he was lurking. Nanowasn'tlurking. He was posting, and rather frequently by that time. But his posts were full of nothing. The fact that you think Lowell and Nano were doing the same thing is simply not true.
You've been after Lowell since your post 131, and have never said why. If anyone here is looking to lynch lurkers, it's you, not me. Every time I spot someone lurking, I've been asking them to post/participate, not voting for them.
I don't get on this board on the weekends, by and large, except to post a quick comment. I checked in Friday afternoon and Saturday afternoon, and when there was nothing on the board either time, I didn't return until this morning.curiouskarmadog wrote:Jesus….Well, on the reread I think Jester is the one that lead the bandwagon…he was 100% sure that Nano was scum..and he never let up…of course now he is quiet….
And I'm caught up. My FOS on Lowell and curiouskarmadog remain, Numenorean is my most likely townie, followed by Sir Tornado and AmeliaLi. ryan drops off that list for me; I'm much less sanguine about him. ryan, I'd like you to actually respond to my 582. Other than that, since my suspicion of Nano was so wrong, I'm gonna take a bit of a back seat accusing anyone directly or voting and listen to what other people have to say for a bit.I do not play MS on weekends; consider me on V/LA during them-
-
ryan Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3593
- Joined: April 19, 2007
- Location: Iowa
Than I guess I was just educated. I've always played that WIFOM stood for "whine in front of me" and I thought there was a bunch of whining and woah is me chat in that post.Jester wrote:
Yeah, I didn't get that, either. ryan, you haven't answered this one yet. The "W" in WIFOM doesn't stand for "whining."Sir Tornado wrote:How is that WIFOM?[i]Please remove your head from your ass before you vote.[/i]-
-
Numenorean7 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 597
- Joined: April 27, 2007
- Location: Arizona, USA
QFTST wrote:And, in I would say that Nano and Lowell were not quite similar on D1. Nano was here, but he wasn't posting. Lowell was away, due to which he was not posting. But, now, I think the "away" thing is really getting a bit out of hand. Lowell, please post or ask for a replacement or be prepared to get lynched, because you have a lot to answer here.
Until he gets back and posts something reasonable (and, depending on the content of that post, perhaps longer)
Vote: Lowell
What do you mean by this?ryan wrote:although I do believe unless I'm misreading this person's posts that we do have one scum who has been confirmed by an "investigation"
I was looking briefly over the recent pages, and I'm uncomfortable with ryan's behavior in his argument with AmeliaLi from 529 to 554. For one thing, AmeliaLi was right: he was trying to get AmeliaLi or klopyrev lynched. That's what he does. Why not just admit it? Ryan gets very excited over this relatively trivial point.
FoS: ryanPolitical Correctness offends me.-
-
ryan Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3593
- Joined: April 19, 2007
- Location: Iowa
Listen, if by some chance AmeliaLi isn't scum (which is now possible) or if Klopy turns up town (doubtful) I'll admit to being wrong BUT that doesn't make me more scum than the first person to vote for somebody who is lynched. I am not a "ringleader" or "you gotta vote for (insert name)" I read through posts, I determine who I believe to be scum, I post comments made by said player and I give the town an opportunity to agree or disagree with my statements.
As for the question you posted, (without trying to sound like I'm hiding) read back through and you will also see what I believe to see, without a doc I don't want to say anything more than this.[i]Please remove your head from your ass before you vote.[/i]-
-
Gatorguy91 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 223
- Joined: May 22, 2007
ok.. this postcuriouskarmadog wrote:[AndFoS Gatorguy, what are YOUR reasons you feel Lowell should be lynched in Day 2
"Frankly I led the charge against him so how can i be more suspicious" Nano Was the doctor and Lowell claims to have played a key part in lynching him. My vote was looking at the town's wants and thinking they wanted a lynch, which is why i posted this. It's blatantly oubvious that Lowell is scum, FoS: Curiouskarmadog for not realizing that.Lowell wrote:Jester wrote:You put the hammer down on Nano, unless my personal vote-count is off, so as soon as Kison notices, we're in night. If I'm right about Nano and I'm right about Lowell (not certain by any means, but he's really setting off my radar right now) and were one of their scum-mates, I'd definitely kill me to shut me up.
Of course, it's still possible that I'm totally wrong about one or both.Twilight FOS Jesterfor trying to direct future lynches...
For attacking Nano I'm MORE likely to be scum? What kind of twisted WIFOM is that?
Frankly I led the charge against him, and was the first to make sure the real doc didn't claim. How can that make me MORE suspicious?ShowPie Tastes Good.
"In completely unrelated news, Gatorguy is awesome"
- pie_is_good
"Your birthday is made of win."
-Glork-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
you are FoSing me because you voted and did not give an explanation?..also interesting...Gatorguy91 wrote:
ok.. this postcuriouskarmadog wrote:[AndFoS Gatorguy, what are YOUR reasons you feel Lowell should be lynched in Day 2
"Frankly I led the charge against him so how can i be more suspicious" Nano Was the doctor and Lowell claims to have played a key part in lynching him. My vote was looking at the town's wants and thinking they wanted a lynch, which is why i posted this. It's blatantly oubvious that Lowell is scum, FoS: Curiouskarmadog for not realizing that.Lowell wrote:Jester wrote:You put the hammer down on Nano, unless my personal vote-count is off, so as soon as Kison notices, we're in night. If I'm right about Nano and I'm right about Lowell (not certain by any means, but he's really setting off my radar right now) and were one of their scum-mates, I'd definitely kill me to shut me up.
Of course, it's still possible that I'm totally wrong about one or both.Twilight FOS Jesterfor trying to direct future lynches...
For attacking Nano I'm MORE likely to be scum? What kind of twisted WIFOM is that?
Frankly I led the charge against him, and was the first to make sure the real doc didn't claim. How can that make me MORE suspicious?-
-
Sir Tornado Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2255
- Joined: May 17, 2007
I know what WIFOM stands for, thank you very much. But the point is, that it was not WIFOM (and, both Num7 and Jester agreed with me on that point)
Than I guess I was just educated. I've always played that WIFOM stood for "whine in front of me" and I thought there was a bunch of whining and woah is me chat in that post.I'm back!-
-
curiouskarmadog This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- This Space for Rant
- Posts: 14229
- Joined: June 17, 2007
- Location: Roanoke, Va
-
-
ryan Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3593
- Joined: April 19, 2007
- Location: Iowa
I never said you didn't know what WIFOM, but you acted as though I didn't. AmeliaLi was whining about me wanting to off her and Klopyboy, it was completely a bunch of whining. I was concerned in finding our scummiest people, but thanks for asking. I'm glad you have two that agree with you, doesn't mean you are right, it's an opinion game ST, I have mine and you have yours, why keep beating this dead horse? You are making no point except badgering over a non important point, move along already.[i]Please remove your head from your ass before you vote.[/i]-
-
AmeliaLi Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 229
- Joined: June 16, 2007
- Location: whooooooops
Okay. This is such of lovely welcome back.
I'm my view, you seem to be getting a little touchy, ryan.ryan wrote:I never said you didn't know what WIFOM, but you acted as though I didn't. AmeliaLi was whining about me wanting to off her and Klopyboy, it was completely a bunch of whining. I was concerned in finding our scummiest people, but thanks for asking. I'm glad you have two that agree with you, doesn't mean you are right, it's an opinion game ST, I have mine and you have yours, why keep beating this dead horse? You are making no point except badgering over a non important point, move along already.
Question: Why thehelldo you tell him to stop beating the dead horse, when you do the exact thing?
And now his (ryan's) problem is we are starting to go through his posts and really pick them apart.Nume, in 610, wrote:I was looking briefly over the recent pages, and I'm uncomfortable with ryan's behavior in his argument with AmeliaLi from 529 to 554. For one thing, AmeliaLi was right: he was trying to get AmeliaLi or klopyrev lynched. That's what he does. Why not just admit it?Ryan gets very excited over this relatively trivial point.
FOS: Ryan
Just as a note: I'm going to be really busy during this week and might be able to only post once a day, but my promise is to not lurk.>.> I changed my email on crywolf20084....
so now i'm on my other account.-
-
ryan Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3593
- Joined: April 19, 2007
- Location: Iowa
Pick apart my posts all you want AmeliaLi, but constantly bringing up a WIFOM statement isnt doing the town any justice, all it's doing is wasting perfectly good scum hunting on a pro town player. Dissecting posts is one thing, dissecting one statement, hell not even a statement is a waste of time and if you cant see that than you sure as heck aren't doing anything of scum hunting either. I am excitable when I see scum and want them lynched, no lies there, if I wasn't town I wouldn't care, I'd let your trivial comments roll off my back, but since I'm town in this game I'm going to be excitable, I'm going to attack scum, and I'm going to keep them sweating in this game.[i]Please remove your head from your ass before you vote.[/i]-
-
Lowell Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6318
- Joined: July 25, 2006
Okay, this is crap.
vote ryan
What exactly are you trying to do here? MANY MANY people didn't believe Nano's claim. We were all wrong, it happens. You have gone from accusing me of NOT PARICIPATING (yesterday) to essentially accusing me of orchestrating a lynch on a powerrole (today). Which is it, chief?
This looks opportunistic at best. Especially since I opened this thread today assuming that I'd have to fend myself off from jester's even more confusing claim that by lynching SCUM I must be scum.
Sir T and Numer- what, exactly, do I have to answer for? Lurking?-
-
Gatorguy91 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 223
- Joined: May 22, 2007
Lowell You know You're close to my playing level as scum which is VERY LOW.Lowell wrote:Okay, this is crap.
vote ryan
What exactly are you trying to do here? MANY MANY people didn't believe Nano's claim. We were all wrong, it happens. You have gone from accusing me of NOT PARICIPATING (yesterday) to essentially accusing me of orchestrating a lynch on a powerrole (today). Which is it, chief?
This looks opportunistic at best. Especially since I opened this thread today assuming that I'd have to fend myself off from jester's even more confusing claim that by lynching SCUM I must be scum.
Sir T and Numer- what, exactly, do I have to answer for? Lurking?ShowPie Tastes Good.
"In completely unrelated news, Gatorguy is awesome"
- pie_is_good
"Your birthday is made of win."
-Glork-
-
AmeliaLi Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 229
- Joined: June 16, 2007
- Location: whooooooops
A) You keep bringing up the fact that it seems likeryan wrote:Pick apart my posts all you want AmeliaLi, but constantly bringing up a WIFOM statement isnt doing the town any justice, all it's doing is wasting perfectly good scum hunting on a pro town player. Dissecting posts is one thing, dissecting one statement, hell not even a statement is a waste of time and if you cant see that than you sure as heck aren't doing anything of scum hunting either. I am excitable when I see scum and want them lynched, no lies there, if I wasn't town I wouldn't care, I'd let your trivial comments roll off my back, but since I'm town in this game I'm going to be excitable, I'm going to attack scum, and I'm going to keep them sweating in this game.youwere the one that brought it (The WIFOM) up in this day, ryan. In post number 609. It hadn't been mentioned today, but for some reason youhadto post.
B) I'm not the one who was dissecting the WIFOM. I ignored what you had said about me because I had nothing to say to you other than a few choice words.
C)
What the hell does that mean? I think you're scum. And this lashing out to all of this makes me wonder some.ryan from the same post above wrote:and if you cant see that than you sure as heck aren't doing anything of scum hunting either
D) Trivial? What the hell is trivial about seeing something and noting it for later?
E) You keep saying you're town. It's not exactly a scum-tell, but I'm pretty sure you get some eyes on you.
SIDETHOUGHT:
Where is Klopy-boy? He managed to survive the night just fine, or has his maybe scum buddies told him to shut the hell up?>.> I changed my email on crywolf20084....
so now i'm on my other account.-
-
Numenorean7 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 597
- Joined: April 27, 2007
- Location: Arizona, USA
Yes, lurking, especially the fact that your vote on Nano was pretty much the only thing you did in the thread. You'll have to admit, popping in to jump onto a growing bandwagon doesn't look good.Lowell wrote:Sir T and Numer- what, exactly, do I have to answer for? Lurking?
Two days later...Lowell wrote:MightyFireball- Is there a reason you're not voting?
only 39 minutes later...Nano wrote:Of course it's a bad thing for me to be dead. Do you really want the Doc lynched?
This is pretty close timing after a comparably long absence. Coincidence?Lowell wrote:I think this is a fake claim.
@Gatorguy:
Why do you see Lowell's behavior as so much more scummy than everyone else's? I certainly agree there is evidence against him, but why Lowell in particular?
If Klopy turns up town? That sounds like you're already planning to get him lynched.ryan wrote:Listen, if by some chance AmeliaLi isn't scum (which is now possible) or if Klopy turns up town (doubtful) I'll admit to being wrong
ryan essentially ignored Nano all day. He did ask him for content a couple of times, and put him at third place on his scumlist, but that's all until this:
At least his vote wasn't a complete flip-flop, but he pretty much stayed away from the Nano discussion until he dropped the hammer (I reserve judgment as to whether this was intentional or not).In post 533, ryan wrote:I think Klopy being lynched is good for the town and if I'm wrong, I'll take the heat, I'm not afraid.If we get to a point where Nanosauromo or you are the two popular choices I'll listen to arguments on why I should change my vote
On Day 2 (today), the only other person to mention ryan's mistake regarding the meaning of WIFOM was ST. He was responding to ryan's comment from earlier today.
In fact, AmeliaLiST wrote:
I know what WIFOM stands for, thank you very much. But the point is, that it was not WIFOM (and, both Num7 and Jester agreed with me on that point)Than I guess I was just educated. I've always played that WIFOM stood for "whine in front of me" and I thought there was a bunch of whining and woah is me chat in that post.nevermentioned the WIFOM mistake, she just said, "I'm not whining". It was Jester who pointed out the error.
Unvote
Vote: ryan
For getting flustered about AmeliaLi's accusation of wagon-pushing, falsely accusing AmeliaLi of focusing on his WIFOM mistake, hammering the doctor after ignoring him all day, rolefishing, and general scumminess.
For the vote-count challenged among us, this is the 3rd vote on ryan, 6 to lynch.
This is the only thing klopy has said today... and he didn't even vote ryan! Is it just me, or does this sound like pushing a wagon without getting on yourself? Klopyrev, why didn't you vote?klopyrev wrote:Ryan is SCUMI told you... He was just looking to lynch. Didn't you all see it? I noticed it first. How he pressured a bangwagon vote. Look at him put the hammer down on our doctor. He knew Nano was town. He knew he was at -1. He did it on purpose. He is one scummy player. Look at his posts.Political Correctness offends me.-
-
Sir Tornado Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 2255
- Joined: May 17, 2007
-
-
Numenorean7 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 597
- Joined: April 27, 2007
- Location: Arizona, USA
This is kinda out of the blue. Where does AmeliaLi come in? I don't have any reason to believe she's scum, and have never said anything to the effect. I'm a little reticent to accuse klopy at this point, because we've just had a mis-lynch on similar evidence, but that's no reason to ignore him. I think it's quite possible ryan is Mafia. Lowell is a close second.ST wrote:Numenorean7, what are you getting at? A ryan-Klopy-AmeliaLi mafia?
Mod
Can we have a prod on Indy?Political Correctness offends me.
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.