THEORY
Look at a post. Does it make sense?
Ask yourself three questions.
1) Is this post biased by an existing conflict or tunnel?
2) Are its assumptions based on known or verifiable quantities?
3) Does it make any sort of sense at all? Throw a wide net on this one. Anything???
If you answered yes to all three, then it passes the eye test!
PRACTICE
#1
In post 37, Empire wrote:Vote: Metal Sonic
In post 18, Metal Sonic wrote:i looked at this playerlist and i decided to not put any tokens lol
Playerlists were revealed after token submissions and alignments were assigned. So how did you come to assign your tokens after the fact?
#2
In post 112, Sotty7 wrote:Vote: GreyICE
Because "tokens" is bullshit and voting me over Hoopla in that respect is even worse.
#3
In post 139, wgeurts wrote:Now:
VOTE: MetalSonic
I do believe I also stated to ZZZX scum would pounce on the stuff you've pounced on as a sort of slayers gambit. You've attempted to falsely frame me, as expected from scum.
#4
In post 271, GreyICE wrote:So "mediating" this town means, and I quote:
In post 224, Hoopla wrote:i abstain from the greyice and sotty argument.
Such mediate.
I wouldn't mind either juicy analysis or just plain old scumhunting. Or you just claiming scum, it would help the cohesion of the town, and is always a solid option. But the only thing I can think of your entrance is you sat down with the biggest bowl I ever saw and had some personal time right before posting.
#5
In post 272, GreyICE wrote:Actually no wait, Hoopla knows what I know, she's town.