Open 33: Crush Mafia (Game Over) before 471

JDodge · Post Post #6 (isolation #0) » Sun Jul 08, 2007 9:38 am

/confirm

JDodge · Post Post #7 (isolation #1) » Sun Jul 08, 2007 9:39 am

Also,

Mod:

Please post the set-up somewhere for easier reference. Also, what are the deadline rules? Will there even be deadlines? Do you require unvoting?

JDodge · Post Post #19 (isolation #2) » Mon Jul 09, 2007 10:45 am

Vote: SSF

JDodge · Post Post #41 (isolation #3) » Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:12 am

xyzzy wrote:So your motive is to find motives?

That sounds almost protown, but assuming that others will reveal their true motives requires knowledge of who has the motive of killing us all.

FoS: HH

Isn't that kind of WIFOM?

JDodge · Post Post #51 (isolation #4) » Fri Jul 20, 2007 5:23 am

I'm here, nothing much to go on ATM.

JDodge · Post Post #54 (isolation #5) » Fri Jul 20, 2007 5:48 am

I don't strategize, so nothing much there.

JDodge · Post Post #56 (isolation #6) » Sat Jul 21, 2007 1:57 am

Erg0 wrote:If you're not going to strategise at least a little in a game with a potential instant town loss then you're not going to be very helpful.

O RLY?

Wouldn't that mean that I would be mostly unhelpful in any closed setup where there is potential for Jester/Lyncher?

Open 25 is a good example of what I mean.

JDodge · Post Post #59 (isolation #7) » Sun Jul 22, 2007 12:44 pm

Erg0 wrote:Glancing at Open 25, it was won by the Jester (which was not you). What's your point?

Yes, but I was somewhat helpful; I did eventually figure out the remaining scum. Your claim that I would be unhelpful is unwarranted.

JDodge · Post Post #68 (isolation #8) » Sun Jul 29, 2007 2:55 am

Erg0 wrote:JDodge: You've just proven my point, which is that scumhunting alone is not going to win the game. We need to also consider strategies to avoid letting the lyncher win.

Uh, hello?

I knew who the remaining scum was. I was

nightkilled in that game

before I had the chance to show that.

How does that = strategy is necessary?

JDodge · Post Post #75 (isolation #9) » Tue Jul 31, 2007 7:50 am

Quite frankly xyzzy, that plan is one of the stupidest ones I've ever seen.

JDodge · Post Post #77 (isolation #10) » Tue Jul 31, 2007 1:14 pm

xyzzy wrote:How is a plan that exploits the setup bad?

It doesn't. It gives you a fake scumtell that you could use to justify going against anyone.

JDodge · Post Post #81 (isolation #11) » Wed Aug 01, 2007 3:54 pm

xyzzy wrote:
JDodge wrote:
xyzzy wrote:How is a plan that exploits the setup bad?
It doesn't. It gives you a fake scumtell that you could use to justify going against anyone.
No, it gives us an incredibly successful scumtell, because it will be up to the scum to protect and attack.

If the GF is at -1 and he isn't allowed to protect himself, the goon is going to have to choose between going all out in his defense, or do nothing and risk losing.

I disagree. It's a tool to lynch the town, and under your plan the scum

won't

defend each other, as they would give themselves away.

Unvote, vote: xyzzy

JDodge · Post Post #92 (isolation #12) » Sun Aug 05, 2007 9:46 am

Mod

: Can you update the first post so that we can remember who replaced who here?

JDodge · Post Post #102 (isolation #13) » Sat Aug 11, 2007 5:08 am

I don't like the way xyzzy tried to explain it away, but I'm

not

comfortable with having him at -1 quite yet, especially with a lyncher about.

Unvote, FoS: Ben

JDodge · Post Post #111 (isolation #14) » Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:32 pm

Er, tell me...

How is a deadline implicitly anti-town?

JDodge · Post Post #117 (isolation #15) » Thu Aug 16, 2007 12:30 am

xyzzy wrote:
JDodge wrote:Er, tell me...

How is a deadline implicitly anti-town?
Because the key to gaining information is day-discussion.

A deadline lowers the amount of time we have to get that information.

Yes, but with a distinct lack of activity, is it really that bad?

JDodge · Post Post #121 (isolation #16) » Fri Aug 17, 2007 10:14 am

Mod

: Deadline extension, please. I R SICK.

JDodge · Post Post #143 (isolation #17) » Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:36 am

I dispute the lack of a deadline extension. I requested that extension before the deadline was over.

JDodge · Post Post #146 (isolation #18) » Thu Aug 30, 2007 8:37 am

Rand Althor wrote:
Rand Althor wrote:
Deadlines

Day 1 will last for 10 days(NonNegotiable)

No, I think not. You denied my request

not based on that

, but because you said that my request was "after the deadline had hit".

JDodge · Post Post #148 (isolation #19) » Fri Aug 31, 2007 1:40 pm

OK then, going by the 10-day rule, SSF should've been lynched, something that would drastically change the result.