In post 1644, T S O wrote:In post 1519, Ellie wrote:I think TSO is the most dangerous person here when he's scum.
Errr, have we played together before?
You must have made an impression on me somewhere
In post 1644, T S O wrote:In post 1519, Ellie wrote:I think TSO is the most dangerous person here when he's scum.
Errr, have we played together before?
In post 1507, SilverWolf wrote:
(10) Klingoncelt: T S O, SilverWolf, FA_Q2, vikingfan, Aeronaut, Nobody Special, Cheetory6, Albert B. Rampage, pisskop, Ozgin [L-1]
(6) NakedJogger: Kitz, Grib, MathBlade, dragonspawn, elusive, Ellie [L-5]
(1) MathBlade: Shinobi
(1) Ellie: Boonskiies
(1) TSO: Klingoncelt
(1) Grib: NakedJogger
Not voting: Wake88
(expired on 2015-02-22 00:00:00)
Here's vc with accurate timer
In post 1614, Wake1 wrote:@Everyone:
If you had to choose between pisskop, Ellie, and vikingfan, which would you go for and why?
BONUS:List these three in order from most suspicious to least.
In post 1725, Ellie wrote:In post 1644, T S O wrote:In post 1519, Ellie wrote:I think TSO is the most dangerous person here when he's scum.
Errr, have we played together before?
You must have made an impression on me somewhere
In post 1723, Ellie wrote:ABR is on the wrong side of history. Textbooks will talk about his incorrect Ellie read for centuries to come.
In post 1728, Wake1 wrote:Hrm. I don't think I've voted at all yet.
Not hammering if I'm fully uncertain.
In post 1722, Ellie wrote:Okay, please quote the posts where I "failed to trust 2 claims", or said I "trusted Ozgin because he was nice to Elusive." (And yes, I think Ozgin's approach to getting into the game looks genuine.)
In post 1734, SilverWolf wrote:Why won't you take a stand on something?
In post 1738, Wake1 wrote:In post 1734, SilverWolf wrote:Why won't you take a stand on something?
"Why won't you take a stand and vote?"
*Wake votes someone*
"Why are you doing that? You're Scum! YOU'RE SCUM! RAH!!"
In post 1735, SilverWolf wrote:In post 1733, Wake1 wrote:Silverwolf, how you think of TSO atm?
Completely null.
In post 1737, pisskop wrote:I apologize. That was not you.
In post 1740, SilverWolf wrote:In post 1738, Wake1 wrote:In post 1734, SilverWolf wrote:Why won't you take a stand on something?
"Why won't you take a stand and vote?"
*Wake votes someone*
"Why are you doing that? You're Scum! YOU'RE SCUM! RAH!!"
Wake, We are close to deadline and anyone not trying to avoid a NL on D1 is scummy to me. How can I possibly read you when you don't vote or take a stand on something? Earlier you said you didn't want to read the game.
Seriously Wake, I can't read you like this.
In post 1735, SilverWolf wrote:In post 1733, Wake1 wrote:Silverwolf, how you think of TSO atm?
Completely null.
In post 1743, Wake1 wrote:In post 1740, SilverWolf wrote:In post 1738, Wake1 wrote:In post 1734, SilverWolf wrote:Why won't you take a stand on something?
"Why won't you take a stand and vote?"
*Wake votes someone*
"Why are you doing that? You're Scum! YOU'RE SCUM! RAH!!"
Wake, We are close to deadline and anyone not trying to avoid a NL on D1 is scummy to me. How can I possibly read you when you don't vote or take a stand on something? Earlier you said you didn't want to read the game.
Seriously Wake, I can't read you like this.
Careful. When Scum-Belisarius got cheeky with me we nailed him.
I don't have to hammer if Mathblade says she will, which removes the possibility of you trying to pin the blame on me should she turn out to be a mislynch.
And it's not that I don't vote or want to take a stand on anything. It's that time is making it so Ican't.
In post 1744, T S O wrote:In post 1735, SilverWolf wrote:In post 1733, Wake1 wrote:Silverwolf, how you think of TSO atm?
Completely null.
I have most definitely done enough to not be a completely null read.
In post 1745, SilverWolf wrote:In post 1743, Wake1 wrote:In post 1740, SilverWolf wrote:In post 1738, Wake1 wrote:In post 1734, SilverWolf wrote:Why won't you take a stand on something?
"Why won't you take a stand and vote?"
*Wake votes someone*
"Why are you doing that? You're Scum! YOU'RE SCUM! RAH!!"
Wake, We are close to deadline and anyone not trying to avoid a NL on D1 is scummy to me. How can I possibly read you when you don't vote or take a stand on something? Earlier you said you didn't want to read the game.
Seriously Wake, I can't read you like this.
Careful. When Scum-Belisarius got cheeky with me we nailed him.
I don't have to hammer if Mathblade says she will, which removes the possibility of you trying to pin the blame on me should she turn out to be a mislynch.
And it's not that I don't vote or want to take a stand on anything. It's that time is making it so Ican't.
Are you threatening me with a scumread for scumhunting you? Where did I say you needed to hammer or tell you who to vote for? You haven't taken a stand on anything this game while the rest of us have. So yeah, you don't take any heat regardless but you aren't scumhunting either.
In post 1748, Wake1 wrote:
You appear to be having a habit of misinterpreting the things I've been saying.
Belisarius tried to get me to vote in Newbie 1565, for a mislynch, and he was Scum.
Similarly, you seem to be trying hard to get me to vote.