Open 29 - C9+2 (~GAME OVER~) before 470

somestrangeflea · Post Post #100 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:02 pm

DG wrote:How does a quick lynch help the mafia?

Because it means the town don't have a chance to discuss stuff with each other, about things.

YogurtBandit · Post Post #101 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:02 pm

somestrangeflea wrote:
DG wrote:How does a quick lynch help the mafia?
Because it means the town don't have a chance to discuss stuff with each other, about things.

Whats to discuss? Besides a claim, nothing.

Rishi · Post Post #102 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:05 pm

DeliciousGoldfish wrote:I'm quite noob so... How does a quick lynch help the mafia?

Well, there's more of a chance that we'll be wrong in a quick lynch, since we have very little information. Also, going into Day 2, we'll have little information, which means we'll still be at square one.

Mert · Post Post #103 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:16 pm

Page Five Votecount

Honary Hitchhiker

(4)

Ripley, Crub, DeliciousGoldfish, YogurtBandit

No Lynch

(1):

Honary Hitchhiker

Not Voting

(4):

AmeliaLi, Lateralus, Rishi, Somestrangeflea

Nine still breathing, five votes will make one stop...

Ripley · Post Post #104 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 1:39 pm

Unvote: Honary Hitchhiker

I'm not ready to see the guy lynched yet, for all the reasons other people have said already, so I'm unvoting for now at least, since some players seem a bit lynch happy...

FOS: YogurtBandit

.

Crub · Post Post #105 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:38 pm

Ok guys time to calm down a bit. We need to wait until we hear from HH before we start calling for his head.

somestrangeflea · Post Post #106 (ISO) » Fri Jul 06, 2007 6:40 am

Crub wrote:Ok guys time to calm down a bit. We need to wait until we hear from HH before we start calling for his head.

Yeah, but do we? The fact that he

hasn't

said anything might give more helpful information than anything he might say.

DeliciousGoldfish · Post Post #107 (ISO) » Fri Jul 06, 2007 6:59 am

HH posted a couple days ago but said nothing really...

We're on page 5 and I agree with SSF. The fact that he's not saying anything, even when he does post... It gives us information.

The best HH could do is claim and really honestly get us to believe it.

somestrangeflea · Post Post #108 (ISO) » Fri Jul 06, 2007 7:10 am

DG wrote:The best HH could do is claim and really honestly get us to believe it.

...and I'm going to hammer you tomorrow if you don't.

Have fun.

somestrangeflea · Post Post #109 (ISO) » Fri Jul 06, 2007 7:41 am

Oh, wtf, I can't! Stupid Ripley and his Unvote. >:(

I had a really cool threat running, and you wrecked it!

:'(

DeliciousGoldfish · Post Post #110 (ISO) » Fri Jul 06, 2007 8:09 am

Then SSF, vote and let someone else throw the hammer if HH doesn't pop his head in here and give us a reason... A good reason at that.

I don't want to sound pushy but, this is a great opportunity for the town. While it may seem like a "quick lynch" I think it's a good move. Because if and when HH comes up scum, we have people's voting records to look at. Specifically why Ripley did in fact remove his vote to put HH back at -2. And why Lateralus has indeed called HH scummy but not voted for him.

somestrangeflea · Post Post #111 (ISO) » Fri Jul 06, 2007 8:12 am

DeliciousGoldfish has given me permission to

Vote: HH

.

I'm not easily led...

DeliciousGoldfish · Post Post #112 (ISO) » Fri Jul 06, 2007 3:05 pm

Haha. I gave you permission? Right on =P

Honary Hitchhiker · Post Post #113 (ISO) » Fri Jul 06, 2007 3:14 pm

I don't want to make a big lists with quotes here so I want to just direct the topics im refering to.

Fos on Lateralus-

When I Fos on lateralus I was only doing it because of his scummy posts not to join with others because he was a primary suspect and not to lead on a vote with him.

No lynch-

Post 71 that I made stated that I messed up with my votes already so I put a no lynch. Then I only wanted to contribute to the discussion so I Fos lateralus. The reason I said I messed up with my votes already was the supposed atempt vote for a bandwagon on ssf.

Bandwagon on Somestrangeflea-

I belive in the start of the game I put a third vote on ssf for no apparent reason but yet I failed to realize this. But later when the bandwagon was pointed out I realized this. I didn't want to mislynch anyone that might not be scum so I unvoted ssf and put a no vote.

Flying under everybodies radar-

When the bandwagoning discussion came out I took notice. Took correct my actions for mistaking a nonsensable vote on ssf I tried to find out who was acting scummy so I didn't mislynch. I seen lateralus acting scummy with posts so I Fos him. However no sooner did I post a Fos I was accused of slipping by and not answering about the bandwagon vote which accusing of this incident would be a sensable thing to do. I forgot to explain myself before I fos lateralus and that would show I was sneaking by everybody.

Any other vital topics to the discussion I missed please point it out.[/b]

Rishi · Post Post #114 (ISO) » Fri Jul 06, 2007 3:59 pm

Honary Hitchhiker wrote:
Flying under everybodies radar-
When the bandwagoning discussion came out I took notice. Took correct my actions for mistaking a nonsensable vote on ssf I tried to find out who was acting scummy so I didn't mislynch. I seen lateralus acting scummy with posts so I Fos him. However no sooner did I post a Fos I was accused of slipping by and not answering about the bandwagon vote which accusing of this incident would be a sensable thing to do. I forgot to explain myself before I fos lateralus and that would show I was sneaking by everybody.

I still don't think you explained why you put an FoS on Lateralus. You just said that in his posts he was "acting scummy." What exactly about his behavior seemed scummy to you? Other than the fact that he has been looking for bandwagons, which is the same thing you're doing.

DeliciousGoldfish · Post Post #115 (ISO) » Fri Jul 06, 2007 4:19 pm

FOSing Lateralus isn't contributing to the discussion. That is only repeating what many of us had already discussed. And we stated MORE about what Lateralus had been writing. You simply FOSed him for being scummy. What about his play is scummy to you?

And it took you a few posts until you actually took your vote off of SSF.

I am definitely keeping my vote on HH for now...

Honary Hitchhiker · Post Post #116 (ISO) » Fri Jul 06, 2007 5:45 pm

Rishi wrote:
Honary Hitchhiker wrote:
Flying under everybodies radar-
When the bandwagoning discussion came out I took notice. Took correct my actions for mistaking a nonsensable vote on ssf I tried to find out who was acting scummy so I didn't mislynch. I seen lateralus acting scummy with posts so I Fos him. However no sooner did I post a Fos I was accused of slipping by and not answering about the bandwagon vote which accusing of this incident would be a sensable thing to do. I forgot to explain myself before I fos lateralus and that would show I was sneaking by everybody.
I still don't think you explained why you put an FoS on Lateralus. You just said that in his posts he was "acting scummy." What exactly about his behavior seemed scummy to you? Other than the fact that he has been looking for bandwagons, which is the same thing you're doing.

Like I said before I only wanted to contribute to the thread discussion not looking for a bandwagon. As for what scummy posts have been made by lateralus:
1. He claims townie in a desperate plea which was really a scummy thing to do.
2. I know I had a suspicous bandwagon vote in the past on ssf but lateralus had two votes on two people who had a vote on them. The first was YB after a random vote was placed on YB and secondely ssf however he explained it that ssf placed a vote on him to start a bandwagon but it still strikes me as suspicous.
3. His reasons are very thin. He voted yogurt bandit putting him at a -2 lynch only saying it was random.He stated that YB had put a random vote(it was only a random vote at the begging of the game that was a single vote) on someone trying to confirm his -2 vote as perfectly resonable.

Rishi · Post Post #117 (ISO) » Fri Jul 06, 2007 7:00 pm

Honary Hitchhiker wrote: Like I said before I only wanted to contribute to the thread discussion not looking for a bandwagon. As for what scummy posts have been made by lateralus:
1. He claims townie in a desperate plea which was really a scummy thing to do.
2. I know I had a suspicous bandwagon vote in the past on ssf but lateralus had two votes on two people who had a vote on them. The first was YB after a random vote was placed on YB and secondely ssf however he explained it that ssf placed a vote on him to start a bandwagon but it still strikes me as suspicous.
3. His reasons are very thin. He voted yogurt bandit putting him at a -2 lynch only saying it was random.He stated that YB had put a random vote(it was only a random vote at the begging of the game that was a single vote) on someone trying to confirm his -2 vote as perfectly resonable.

You are criticizing Lateralus for putting the second vote on two different people. That means that you feel that people in this game should pay attention to who they are voting for. And yet, you expect us to believe that you didn't happen to notice that you put a third vote on somestrangeflea?

I don't understand half of what you are saying, but you seemed to have a reason for voting somestrangeflea. It wasn't just a random vote. There seems to be something you're not telling us.

You're not defending yourself very well, but I think you should probably have one more chance to contribute to the discussion. We already know that you feel that Lateralus is scummy. What are your thoughts on the other players?

somestrangeflea · Post Post #118 (ISO) » Sat Jul 07, 2007 2:01 am

I'm not convinced by HH's "defense", and I've had quite enough. Quick lynch or not, I want this guy dead.

AmeliaLi, Lateralus, Rishi, Ripley, someone hammer please. I promise you now I will not think you scummy if you do.

AmeliaLi · Post Post #119 (ISO) » Sat Jul 07, 2007 6:05 am

Hey all I've had to get a new computer because my little cousin thought it'd be funny to take a magnet to it. I should be caught up by tonight.

Rishi · Post Post #120 (ISO) » Sat Jul 07, 2007 6:15 am

Well, Honary Hitchhiker has been logged on since I asked him to give a better defense. He has also posted in some other threads. So, obviously, he has nothing to say.

Vote: Honary Hitchhiker

DeliciousGoldfish · Post Post #121 (ISO) » Sat Jul 07, 2007 6:24 am

And that's the hammer.... Alrighty... Cross your fingers everyone! Though I don't think we'll need any help from above for this one...

Investigate wisely and save wisely and whatever other roles may be out there!!!

Good luck making it through the night everyone!

somestrangeflea · Post Post #122 (ISO) » Sat Jul 07, 2007 9:08 am

I have a feeling we will like what Mert posts when he... does.

I hoped to make that sentence much more exciting than I did.

Mert · Post Post #123 (ISO) » Sat Jul 07, 2007 10:22 am

Day One Final Votecount

Honary Hitchhiker

(5)

Crub, DeliciousGoldfish, YogurtBandit, Somestrangeflea, Rishi

No Lynch

(1):

Honary Hitchhiker

Not Voting

(3):

AmeliaLi, Lateralus, Ripley

Lynch!

Mod Note:

Many thanks to the eagle-eyed Rishi who pointed out the slight error with the vote count - had Ripley and Somestrangeflea around the wrong way. This has now been corrected. Thanks again, Rishi!

Mert · Post Post #124 (ISO) » Sat Jul 07, 2007 10:26 am

You all gather around Honary Hitchhiker wondering why he didn't want to lynch anybody and putting pressure on him to answer your increasingly difficult questions. Suddenly Rishi drops a bombshell - he says he has seen Honary Hitchhiker around but he has avoided coming to the town square to talk to people... with that, Rishi decides he's had enough and casts the final vote required to lynch him.

Once he has been hung from the neck and is confirmed dead, you search his house and find a pistol, ammunition and a list of people he wants to try and get lynched.

Honary Hitchhiker was

Scum

.

~~~

It is now Night One. Deadline for night choices is 7pm BST on Monday 9 July (a litttle under 45 hours from the time of this post).