Open 25 - Jester Mafia (Jester Wins/Mafia 2nd) - before 462

Qman · Post Post #200 (ISO) » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:20 am

I'm with the no lynch crowd, lynching gorkat has just seemed silly since the whole lynch gorkat talk started

vote: No Lynch

YogurtBandit · Post Post #201 (ISO) » Tue Jul 03, 2007 10:23 am

Qman wrote:I'm with the no lynch crowd, lynching gorkat has just seemed silly since the whole lynch gorkat talk started

vote: No Lynch

Gorkcat still leading by one, so we will basically have to lynch no lynch.

Qman · Post Post #202 (ISO) » Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:21 pm

ZOMG DEADLINEZ!

Qman · Post Post #203 (ISO) » Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:21 pm

Ah damn, an hour early!

Romanus · Post Post #204 (ISO) » Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:40 pm

Vote Count

, powered by The Count-Counter 2000

No Lynch- 5 (gorckat, BattleMage,pickemgenius,JDodge,Qman)
gorckat- 4 (Sir Tornado, YogurtBandit, ThAdmiral, Lawrencelot)
Sir Tornado- 1 (WeyounsLastClone)

Not voting (0):

6 to lynch.

NO LYNCH

Night choices in as soon as possible.

Romanus · Post Post #205 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:36 am

Everyone survives the day, but not so for the night:

pickemgenius

,

townie

, died Night 1

With 9 alive, it's 5 to lynch.

Sir Tornado · Post Post #206 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 1:01 am

Vote Lawrencelot

FOS: gorckat

ThAdmiral · Post Post #207 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 1:32 am

I didn't like the no-lynch

vote: gorckat

gorckat · Post Post #208 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 2:02 am

vote:Lawrencelot

I'm sorry you didn't like it. Perhaps its

your

partner we're getting ready to string up.

Lawrencelot · Post Post #209 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:07 am

Vote: gorckat

. (I thought Sir T was my partner?) If we had lynched scum, the townies wouldn't be at a disadvantage now. There were enough people of who it was rather sure they're not jester, so if you lynched a probable scum that's not jester town would have more chance.

gorckat · Post Post #210 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:19 am

Lawrencelot wrote:
Vote: gorckat
. (I thought Sir T was my partner?) If we had lynched scum, the townies wouldn't be at a disadvantage now. There were enough people of who it was rather sure they're not jester, so if you lynched a probable scum that's not jester town would have more chance.

I thought Sir Tornado was "most likely" to be your partner. I've also FoSed JDodge.

Since I'm not your partner, I can't say with 100% certainty who that partner is.

Thad is curiously passive in his oppoistion to me and the No-Lynch. He posted once ~2 weeks ago, and again today. He certainly didn't do much to stop or ague against the No-Lynch.

Also- what grave disadvantage are we at right now? We're going to run up one scum, and by my count that leaves 6 townies and a Jester.

Sir Tornado · Post Post #211 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:55 am

I still stick to my day 2 opinion.

Gorckat and Lawrencelot are the scum. I can't believe half the town decided to buy gorckat's No-Lynch yesterday. Can we lynch him or Lawrencelot today please?

Now, here is my questions to those who no-lynched yesterday:

1) Why did you no lynch?

2) Are the reasons you no-lynched yesterday valid today too?

3) If they are, then what was the point in no-lynching yesterday?

This is precisely the reason why I hate no-lynches

Sir Tornado · Post Post #212 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 4:01 am

EBWOP:

I meant my Day

one

opinion...

gorckat · Post Post #213 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 4:09 am

Sir Tornado wrote:I still stick to my day 2 opinion.

Gorckat and Lawrencelot are the scum. I can't believe half the town decided to buy gorckat's No-Lynch yesterday. Can we lynch him or Lawrencelot today please?

Now, here is my questions to those who no-lynched yesterday:

1) Why did you no lynch?

2) Are the reasons you no-lynched yesterday valid today too?

3) If they are, then what was the point in no-lynching yesterday?

This is precisely the reason why I hate no-lynches

I'll answer since you didn't exclude me.

1) Lawrence claimed he was scum or Jester. If he's Jester, then it was in the mafia's interest to NK him since we are going to lynch him today.

2) I assume you mean "should we No-Lynch today"? No, of course not. Lawrence lived, he is scum.

3) N/A per my answer to #2

Now, if I'm scum, what do I gain by laying out exactly how who my partner is? I'd offered myself for lynch yesterday; what if I

had

been lynched? Lawrence lives and he gets lynched. Scum lose...whoops!

There's no way Lawrence and I are partners.

Battle Mage · Post Post #214 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 4:12 am

Sir Tornado wrote: 1) Why did you no lynch?

2) Are the reasons you no-lynched yesterday valid today too?

3) If they are, then what was the point in no-lynching yesterday?

This is precisely the reason why I hate no-lynches

1. despite him looking scummy, Gorckats logic made some sense. I had thought that the scum would be trying to NK the Jester, however the kill choice strikes me as a little odd. I dont think Pickem would have been my top candidate for being a Jester. That throws some suspicion on the more probable candidates like Lawrence and YB...

2. No. The whole logic behind No Lynching, was to see if the scum killed Lawrence. I think its pretty likely that, as they haven't they don't think he is the Jester, and is thus very likely scum.

3. The point was, we didn't lose a player unnecessarily, and we seem to have confirmed our lynch for today.

I'm pretty happy with a

Vote: Lawrencelot

Oh and dont think this means i trust you Gorckat. I still feel your interactions could indicate heavy bussing...

BM

Battle Mage · Post Post #215 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 4:19 am

gorckat wrote: Now, if I'm scum, what do I gain by laying out exactly how who my partner is? I'd offered myself for lynch yesterday; what if I
had
been lynched? Lawrence lives and he gets lynched. Scum lose...whoops!

There's no way Lawrence and I are partners.

thats poor logic. Assuming you had been lynched and come up scum yesterday, it would have been because people didn't buy your strategy. In you coming up scum, Lawrence would have looked town, in the way that you set him up for a lynch.
Even if you hadn't been lynched, your plan served to allow Lawrence to live a little longer. Don't get me wrong, i think your plan was probably the right one, but it doesn't confirm you as town.
It also made you look better should Lawrence come up scum.

Most players can see through obvious distancing.

BM

gorckat · Post Post #216 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 4:25 am

Battle Mage wrote:In you coming up scum, Lawrence would have looked town, in the way that you set him up for a lynch.

The point that he claimed Jester/Scum still stands, though. That's when I started after him.

If I were lynched scum and Lawrence made it through the night, the point still stands that a claimed Jester/Scum lived and would need to be dealt with.

gorckat · Post Post #217 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 4:26 am

Heh- the second time I used "the point stands" I hit CTRL-F trying to see if someone else had used that phrase recently. Missed my own post, however

JDodge · Post Post #218 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 4:49 am

I voted no-lynch because I didn't think gorckat was a good lynch choice.

Now I do.

Vote: gorckat

pickemgenius · Post Post #219 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 4:57 am

Bah! Go town!!!

gorckat · Post Post #220 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 5:13 am

JDodge wrote:I voted no-lynch because I didn't think gorckat was a good lynch choice.

Now I do.

Vote: gorckat

Why? Because I lived?

JDodge · Post Post #221 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 5:22 am

gorckat · Post Post #222 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 5:25 am

I should've just let it at 'Why?'...I decided not to post 'May I ask why?' since I figured you'd just say 'Yes' :/

Why?

JDodge · Post Post #223 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 5:27 am

I care not to tell at the moment.

YogurtBandit · Post Post #224 (ISO) » Thu Jul 05, 2007 5:30 am

Vote:Gorckcat