Mafia 64: The New "C9" - Game over!

[Glork]

Hey Jack, remember how you just said in the SuiBombers postgame that you need to start being more convincing?


...try convincing me instead of just saying 'X needs to die.'

[Jack]

I should, but I probably don't need to so I won't.

[Sarcastro]

He's right. He really doesn't need to.

[YogurtBandit]

He's right. He really doesn't need to.

But there isnt any thing wrong with change.

[Jack]

He's right. He really doesn't need to.

But there isnt any thing wrong with change.

Really? When Russia had a revolution and changed into a Communist nation, there was nothing wrong with that? What are you, a

Communist

?

That's just one more reason to vote for YB.

[Glork]

Still, if nothing else is going to happen, I may hop the wagon just to ensure that a lynch happens. It seems as though nobody wants to listen to me re:Shteven.

[Albert B. Rampage]

*avidly raises hand* I am!!

[YogurtBandit]

*avidly raises hand* I am!!

You are what?

[Albert B. Rampage]

Listening

[YogurtBandit]

Listening

Oh.

[Glork]

I think that YB should claim.

[Jack]

Seriously.

*post 1111*

[Albert B. Rampage]

A claim is indeed in order.

[Sarcastro]

He's right. He really doesn't need to.

But there isnt any thing wrong with change.

Really? When Russia had a revolution and changed into a Communist nation, there was nothing wrong with that? What are you, a

Communist

?

That's just one more reason to vote for YB.

Actually, the February Revolution was an extremely good thing. Quite frankly, the Romanovs had it coming. Karensky's government was about a million times better than the Tsars. The October Revolution, in which Lenin seized power, wasn't as good, but I would still consider Lenin a positive change compared to the Tsars. Only once you get to Stalin does it really become as bad as it was pre-revolution.

In conclusion, I have no idea why I bothered to say all that. It's not like it's less game-related than some of the stuff that people are saying.

I suppose a claim is a necessary step on the road to stringing him up. Let's get moving.

[YogurtBandit]

When did Jack say that? :shiftyeyes:

I'd oerfe claiming later, since the deadline is still a week away.

[YogurtBandit]

When did Jack say that? :shiftyeyes:

I'd perfer claiming later, since the deadline is still a week away.

EBWOP:Woa, Typo.

[Jack]

We need time to find an alternative if your claim convinces us not to lynch you.

Claim now.

[YogurtBandit]

We need time to find an alternative if your claim convinces us not to lynch you.

Claim now.

Role Fishing?

Meh, HEre it is.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Vanilla

Although Im sure you are set in stone about me. Istill want all the pepole on my wagon to respond to the defense pbpa on BT's. I also want to hear from Hungry Joe who is on my wagon but isn't here.

[Shteven]

@ glork

I think the only thing I disagreed with in your last post was the use of the word fallacy To me, that means you've drawn a conclusion that does not follow from the assumptions. If the assumptions themselves are wrong, then that's just using wrong assumptions. Like I said, in order for it to be useful, you'd have to have a rather high success rate. And I trust that you wouldn't lie about your record, so clearly the success rate was unrealistic. Or rather, it is for day 1. Day 1 you just can't be that certain.

Of course, we have to lynch someone, but if the success rate truly is so low be careful how certain you make your case sound. After all, me sounding too certain about albert was what got most people thinking I was scum in the first place.

[Mastermind of Sin]

Glork, I find it odd that the thing you take issue with the most in Shteven's post was his

numbers

...The numbers may be wrong, but even 60% success rate is greater than random. You haven't really addressed his point, instead merely taking issue with his assumptions.

[Glork]

I've debunked his entire argument by proving his assumptions wrong. Whether the statistics or the logic are sound or significant is immaterial, if the foundation on which it is based is inherently flawed.

[Shteven]

True, I'm not putting that much weight on it anymore, but the difference between logical fallacy and incorrect assumptions is one that is important to me, at least for my pride. One says I can't (or at least didn't here) reason correctly, the other simply means I overestimated your reputation. I wouldn't mind that so much. Other than my pride, other players would probably not use it to claim that I'm trying to be deliberately misleading.

The lower your accuracy, the less of the tell it is. Your accuracy should be somewhat higher than random, but on day one, it's not enough to be accurate. Maybe on day three, we'll have to wait and see

[The Central Scrutinizer]

Check the vacations/away thread.

I'm happy with the Glork-vote. I don't see any reason to join another bandwagon.

[inHimshallibe]

This Day is dragging on like a two-legged dog...

vote: shorten deadline

.

But, seriously, we have three wagons full of committed people. This is a good Day, that really ought to have just ended a while back. >.<

[Glork]

I pretty much agree with inHim. Like I said, for the sake of securing a lynch, I'll switch to YB before deadline unless I can be convinced otherwise.