Open 28 - Quack Mafia. OVER! But who won? before 466

JordanA24 · Post Post #5 (isolation #0) » Sun Jul 01, 2007 5:36 am

First Post

Original Roll String: 1d11

1 11-Sided Dice: (4) = 4

JordanA24 · Post Post #6 (isolation #1) » Sun Jul 01, 2007 5:37 am

Vote: BM

JordanA24 · Post Post #31 (isolation #2) » Tue Jul 03, 2007 3:59 am

Should anyone else who protected Fernando last night claim?

JordanA24 · Post Post #43 (isolation #3) » Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:04 am

Hjallti, it isn't a question of experience, if BM hasn't played in a Quack game, he is just as likely to make that mistake as less experienced players.

JordanA24 · Post Post #46 (isolation #4) » Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:18 am

I protected successfully last night.

JordanA24 · Post Post #48 (isolation #5) » Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:49 am

curiouskarmadog wrote:First Quack game...so not sure what will be helpful for the town when it comes to info. off the top...Claiming: Doctor..however, I did nothing in the night, because I was afraid of my possible Quackness killing someone.

also when the Mod posts deaths, is they anyway to disinguish between a Quack death and a mafia hit?

JordanA24 · Post Post #64 (isolation #6) » Fri Jul 06, 2007 5:10 am

The mafia aren't affected by a quack "protecting" them.

JordanA24 · Post Post #68 (isolation #7) » Fri Jul 06, 2007 6:15 am

Maybe BM doesn't understand Quack fully yet either, I had to check the front page to make sure that Quacks don't kill Mafia.

JordanA24 · Post Post #85 (isolation #8) » Sun Jul 08, 2007 3:26 am

Battle Mage wrote: I protected Mert last night.

So did I.

JordanA24 · Post Post #119 (isolation #9) » Sun Jul 08, 2007 11:45 pm

I'm not to sure about Curious claiming to have not protected, it seems like something a scum would say so they have one less "protection that can be analysed for possible truthness.

JordanA24 · Post Post #142 (isolation #10) » Tue Jul 10, 2007 1:03 am

curiouskarmadog wrote:IF I was mafia trying to be town, wouldnt it have been easier to say I targetted Fern?

WIFOM, WIFOM, WIFOM

JordanA24 · Post Post #163 (isolation #11) » Wed Jul 11, 2007 7:08 am

Hjallti wrote:We might try to setup the choices for next night in advance thus gaining the most information like you would do if you play MasterMind, going for a combination that gives more information. But I don't see at forehand a way to direct this. Any thoughts?

I was thinking about we do a list of the players that is then randomized by the player we think the most pro-town (a scum would probably just pick the order to suit the scum), and we have to target the person below us on the list. The only problem is that we would be set to lose possibly 3 pro-town players (remember mafiates aren't affected by quack "protections"), but the chance of having at least one quack target a scum is about 90% (according to my rough and hasty calculations which I'm not sure are correct, can someone check this please).

I'm not sure that the potential 3 town dead are worth knowing who the quacks are. Anyway, what do you guys think of this?

JordanA24 · Post Post #177 (isolation #12) » Wed Jul 11, 2007 11:35 pm

Indy wrote:I can't help but just be confused by Mert's question,
"So your strategy was to try and target someone you believed would be targetted so you could test your role?"
Just seems like an odd out of the park question. It was first round... how would anyone know who might be targeted? What made you choose Curious? What made anyone choose anyone first round, it was like a stab in the dark trying to turn suspicion to me. With that,

Unvote
Vote: Mert

It makes perfect sense to me, why would you choose someone to test your role if you think they would be targeted by others, how would that test your role if other people targeting them would mess up your results?

JordanA24 · Post Post #184 (isolation #13) » Fri Jul 13, 2007 11:15 am

Indy wrote:
JordanA24 wrote:
Indy wrote:I can't help but just be confused by Mert's question,
"So your strategy was to try and target someone you believed would be targetted so you could test your role?"
Just seems like an odd out of the park question. It was first round... how would anyone know who might be targeted? What made you choose Curious? What made anyone choose anyone first round, it was like a stab in the dark trying to turn suspicion to me. With that,

Unvote
Vote: Mert
It makes perfect sense to me, why would you choose someone to test your role if you think they would be targeted by others, how would that test your role if other people targeting them would mess up your results?
Again, your question makes -zero- sense to me. "Why would I choose someone, if I thought they would be targeted by another?"

When did I -ever- say I thought Curious was going to be targeted by another, I just targeted a random person, that is the way I do.

Now on to you, the way you play and thinks seems to imply that you would need a reason to select someone, so tell me why you selected Curious.

Just read back, and realised I misread the question, sorry

.

I protected Mert, not Curious, because I thought he was going to be targetted by scum.

JordanA24 · Post Post #193 (isolation #14) » Mon Jul 16, 2007 1:07 am

Hjallti wrote:I find your last reply a bit dodgy

Pun intended?

JordanA24 · Post Post #277 (isolation #15) » Tue Jul 24, 2007 12:35 am

Sorry, haven't been too active in this, rereading now.

JordanA24 · Post Post #278 (isolation #16) » Tue Jul 24, 2007 1:40 am

OK, a couple of things, first of all Vote: BM, for the reasons Theo said, and for his instantaneous OMGUS vote straight afterwards.

Also, JDodge, you've yet to explain this:

JDodge wrote:
Mert wrote:JDodge, who should we lynch?
Indy. Then Jordan.

JordanA24 · Post Post #279 (isolation #17) » Tue Jul 24, 2007 1:40 am

Forgot bold tags

Vote: BM

JordanA24 · Post Post #287 (isolation #18) » Wed Jul 25, 2007 4:34 am

Ms Piggy wrote:great then maybe you can help lynch BM. Everyone's claimed, topics have been exhausted, and I've already seen arguments against BM, no need to regurgitate them.

Unvote Vote: Ms Piggy

, looking for a quick end to the day are we? That's an awful excuse.

JordanA24 · Post Post #293 (isolation #19) » Wed Jul 25, 2007 8:03 am

Battle Mage wrote:
Mert wrote:
Ms Piggy wrote:great then maybe you can help lynch BM. Everyone's claimed, topics have been exhausted, and I've already seen arguments against BM, no need to regurgitate them.
How about we lynch BM and, if he's town, we lynch you tomorrow?

FoS Mert
just for that post.

OMGUS much?

JordanA24 · Post Post #317 (isolation #20) » Tue Jul 31, 2007 10:35 am

JDodge wrote:
Unvote, Vote: Indy

Why?

JordanA24 · Post Post #378 (isolation #21) » Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:43 am

I'm still here, nothing has really convinced me to change my vote. Though, I'm quite out of touch with this game, so I'm off for a reread, after which I shall post my other 2 top suspects.

JordanA24 · Post Post #381 (isolation #22) » Fri Aug 10, 2007 7:05 am

2.

Mert

: For a number of reasons, firstly for the links with Piggy, who is my Number 1 suspect. A few pages back, he said we should lynch BM, then Piggy if BM turns up town, then does this:

Mert wrote:Don't worry BM, I wanted to see how she responded to the suggestion rather than actually planning to do it.

Right now, I still want to lynch CKD mostly.

WTF? That was just for response reasons? Why did you do that? BM and Piggy weren't that connected, Piggy was voting BM, and? So was I, why didn't you do that to, say, JDodge and Indy, or BM and Stewie? I think you were trying to do that to say "Look, I'm focusing on Piggy now, I'm saying we should lynch him", let me ask you this, If people started agreeing with you and started voting BM, would you have said that it was just for reactions?

Another reason for you being my Number 2 suspect is that I think CKD is protown, both you and Dral (while he was around) were heavily against him, and I think CKD has been a reasonably useful member of the town. I also think Hjallti made some excellent points against you as well.

3.

ControlledBurn

: While he was around, I feel he was actively lurking, the majority of his posts where completely contentless.

I also hate this post:

ControlledBurn wrote:The problem with a mass claim this early is it gives the scum a sure list of who is a doc and who's a quack, and can start trying to eliminate the normal doc's each night.

One of the most crucial weapons the town has to lynch scum is information, in this game, that sort of information is absolutely vital. Saying we shouldn't take advantage of it because the scum might be able to work out who the actual docs are is very weak (and poor) reasoning.

JordanA24 · Post Post #383 (isolation #23) » Fri Aug 10, 2007 8:18 am

Vampaneze?

JordanA24 · Post Post #386 (isolation #24) » Fri Aug 10, 2007 9:19 am

Stewie wrote:Ms Piggy hasn't posted on the site since Aug 29

I didn't know you had a crystal ball.

JordanA24 · Post Post #390 (isolation #25) » Fri Aug 10, 2007 9:02 pm

Stewie wrote:
JordanA24 wrote:
Stewie wrote:Ms Piggy hasn't posted on the site since Aug 29
I didn't know you had a crystal ball.
?

I think you meant July 29th.

JordanA24 · Post Post #410 (isolation #26) » Wed Aug 15, 2007 1:21 am

Erm, my vote's on d3sisted right? Good.

JordanA24 · Post Post #445 (isolation #27) » Sat Aug 18, 2007 9:21 pm

I'd like to see some more content from scmp please, the guy he replaced was on my scumlist.

JordanA24 · Post Post #490 (isolation #28) » Wed Aug 29, 2007 9:55 am

Sorry for my recent inactiveness, I'm still set on the d3sisted lynch.

JordanA24 · Post Post #540 (isolation #29) » Sat Sep 08, 2007 1:20 am

Well that sucks, I protected Vel last night.

JordanA24 · Post Post #578 (isolation #30) » Wed Sep 26, 2007 10:51 am

I'm here,

Is it just me, or did mneme's post seem a bit general? He mentioned we reached endgame-land, and yet I can't see him doing any analysis on who might be scum (unless you count him posting who was on the d3sistedtown-wagon.)

JordanA24 · Post Post #594 (isolation #31) » Sun Sep 30, 2007 8:35 am

I agree that no lynch at this stage is a horrible idea. If we do it, we have to hope that we lynch scum

3 times in a row

. I'm much happier taking the risk of lynching someone today. I don't think it's vote-worthy though, I think suggesting it was silly rather than scummy. I think CKD jumped on it rather hastily for my liking.

FOS: CKD