In post 6683, Pine wrote:Actually, I steadfastedly avoided posts that merely restated my conclusion, and tried to only quote ones that explained my reasoning. Nice try.
You have a very loose definition of 'not restating' then.
In post 6683, Pine wrote:I went through my entire ISO, and only quoted about half the posts that mention you.
In this quote, I am highlighting the collusion between you and Boon. You stubbornly refuse to evenconsiderthe possibility of Boon as a Wolf. Town wouldn't dismiss the possibility, Mafia certainly wouldn't.
I did consider Boon as a Wolf - that is part and parcel of my 'I only see Boon with TSO' conversation. We can discuss that if you like, but it's a clear lie that I haven't considered him as scum in general and wolf in particular. Indeed, he's my frontrunner for Mafia at this stage, and I discussed my reasoning or that also.
In post 6683, Pine wrote:And seriously, how cowardly was it to choose one of the simplest and most straightforward posts to use as your example?
Oh, I only took the easy one, eh?
Okay...
How about 5954 - where you just post a funny picture - that was worth noting as part of your "case"?
Or 6155 - which is you saying 'oh, just because there is evidence that you are not a buddy to someone, it could have been a scum plan!' which is...the opposite of a 'case'.
Or 6263 - which I have repeatedly asked you to justify, as you're claiming I'm Wolf for "bloodthirtiness" while neither showing bloodthirstiness nor explaining how it's a wolf tell.
Or 6411 where you ding me and Boon for 'eerie simultaneous attacks' while ignoring that Boon did the same thing with TSO and that TSO did the same thing with me.
Or 6513 where basically you're trying to make a sarcastic=scummy case.
Aw...crap...I'm being sarcastic again, so now this post is part of your case against me too.
No - your case is just a random Thor+Boon based on how Boon is treating me more than how I'm treating him, and ignoring how I'm treating others (and being treated by others) in similar fashions. Why is that?