Mini 1636: Mafialand Mayhem! - [Game Over]

[MonkeyMan576]

I gave an example post.

exactly

why are you telling that only now?

why that's not on #606?

instead you ignore

DoucheDog

and once again state it's all of

my

posts

He said all of her posts, i asked him for one in particular and he has again not provided one.

Any time she posts anything with content it is about how terrible everyone's reads on her are. She hardly ever posts anything about anyone else.

I'm not ignoring him and I'm not saying it's all of her posts. You deserve to be lynched on your misrepping alone.

[Lapsa]

yes,

Wake88

. show some fluency of thought

[droog]

wake take a look at my 605

[Lapsa]

I'm not ignoring him and I'm not saying it's all of her posts. You deserve to be lynched on your misrepping alone.

come at me, bro

[Lapsa]

wake take a look at my 605

also,

Wake88

- explain reasoning

[Wake1]

Lapsa's annoying in general. Him being gone would be nice, but would that be best for Town?

Dunno about Sthar. He's being over-reactive? In what way? Not sure if that's normal for him.

I'd prefer not to focus on Katie and focus on Lapsa, but I've posted my case on Katie.

So, don't focus on Katie but on Lapsa... but you have a case on Katie.

yes,

Wake88

. show some fluency of thought

Oh, you certainly do not know me.

wake take a look at my 605

Why should I? Give me the highlights, please. My time's precious, so if you can boil it down and make it worthwhile, I'll take more interest.

[Lapsa]

yes,

Wake88

. show some fluency of thought

Oh, you certainly do not know me.

i'm curious - will get to know you

[llll]

Well, watching Lapsa's trolling is rather amusing, but at the end of the day, it's quite anti-town. I want a claim, not just youtube links and cat pics.

Vote: Lapsa

[Lapsa]

Vanilla town

[Lapsa]

i mean christ
does no one else take issue with

lapsa

voting

monkey

after saying he wanted to unvote
and having no justification for his unvote?
when he wasnt even voting

monkey

and he still hasnt unvoted?

does that make a lick of sense??

I already did:

I like

droogs

ability to multi task.

Will unvote for now.

Unvote

Changing your mind as the game progresses shows fluency of thought and is protown, as opposed to just lurking or posting bad arguments.

[llll]

@Lapsa So why all the weird behavior then?

[Lapsa]

@Lapsa So why all the weird behavior then?

what behavior you find weird?

[Wake1]

So, why vote Lapsa?

[droog]

because

lapsa

is not playing to town wincon

[llll]

@Lapsa So why all the weird behavior then?

what behavior you find weird?

All the pictures, youtube links, odd coloring, generally several word contentless posts. Come on.

[Wake1]

because

lapsa

is not playing to town wincon

For being immature? For being useless? For being anti-Town?

I'd rather we vote someone for being suspicious, instead of being a cumbersome impediment.

[droog]

are none of those things suspicious to you?
why?
what is suspicious?

[Wake1]

are none of those things suspicious to you?
why?
what is suspicious?

No, they aren't, unless they're indicative of his alignment through an understanding of his standard gameplay.

In my opinion, using hyperbole, exaggerating things, taking them out of context, and shifting your vote onto growing wagons with frivolous reasons are suspicious things.

[Lapsa]

because

lapsa

is not playing to town wincon

amazing balls

Clown

, olive is one my favorite colours

[Lapsa]

@Lapsa So why all the weird behavior then?

what behavior you find weird?

All the pictures, youtube links, odd coloring, generally several word contentless posts. Come on.

be more specific. everything i do has a reason

you got my claim

[MonkeyMan576]

lapsa's insistance that no one him a case on them when we have more than enough is getting old. Meanwhile, you're voting on me and you don't even know why.

[droog]

are none of those things suspicious to you?
why?
what is suspicious?

No, they aren't, unless they're indicative of his alignment through an understanding of his standard gameplay.

In my opinion, using hyperbole, exaggerating things, taking them out of context, and shifting your vote onto growing wagons with frivolous reasons are suspicious things.

find me someone who did all those things
and ill gladly join you
((hint: its not monkey))

[Wake1]

lapsa's insistance that no one him a case on them when we have more than enough is getting old. Meanwhile, you're voting on me and you don't even know why.

This is a bit garbled.

are none of those things suspicious to you?
why?
what is suspicious?

No, they aren't, unless they're indicative of his alignment through an understanding of his standard gameplay.

In my opinion, using hyperbole, exaggerating things, taking them out of context, and shifting your vote onto growing wagons with frivolous reasons are suspicious things.

find me someone who did all those things
and ill gladly join you
((hint: its not monkey))

Never said someone here did.

You asked me what was suspicious, and I gave you my opinion of what I find suspicious in general.

[Lapsa]

find me someone who did all those things
and ill gladly join you
(((hint: its not

monkey

)))

Personally, I define fluff as posts that don't really have much if anything to do with the game at hand. Like discussing

jam recipes

within an active Mafia game.

I don't get the feeling that being emotional or defensive is indicative of alignment. Maybe when it comes to meta, but that's typically unreliable. Misrepresentation and hyperbole, I think, are scumtells.

-----=====

Katie's

jam recipe =====-----

@KatieB

does your lack of time alternates?

I dunno

.

mix all of this with 2 teaspoons of assumption that we ain't nothing more but functions of time

[droog]

ok Wake
i know you're working on limited time but
if you're not willing to vote lapsa
could you elaborate on why?

if you have the time to post suspicions
could you take a look at ||||'s and Luca's isos?
((selected almost at random))

if you want to vote monkey
is there no way to convince you lapsa is better?