Mini 1636: Mafialand Mayhem! - [Game Over]

[Luca Blight]

I need to catch up on a few pages, but I definitely prefer a Lapsa lynch to a Monkey one right now.

UNVOTE:

VOTE: Lapsa

[curiouskarmadog]

give me a 3 point case for anyone who is scummier.

but most likely this close to deadline I am not coming off my vote.

[curiouskarmadog]

above post was for droog.

[droog]

got a minute.


bottom line.

droog do you think being defensive/emotional is scummy?

-- no. being defensive is suspicious but not normally enough on its own

I do that all the time. I will do it this game, because I play hot...am I scummy for doing so?

I asked Monkey to provide a particular post where he deemed that katie was being defensive/emotional (scummy) which made him vote her (had to ask twice). He said all of her posts, i asked him for one in particular and he has again not provided one.

id like to ese monkey respond to this
but im that doesnt sound like so much to go on
since the morkey/katie thing was at the beginning of the day

Do you think these actions from Monkey are from someone who is town and really believes his case?

i dont think monkey had to believe his case
it was at the beginnnig of the day

[MonkeyMan576]

That's a bad reason not to change your vote, if you think lapsa or Ill is scummier than me.

[droog]

give me a 3 point case for anyone who is scummier.

but most likely this close to deadline I am not coming off my vote.

1) lapsa refuses to cooperate
((where 'cooperate' means
share reads
explain actions
or even talk to other people normally))

2) lapsa has shown he can cooperate
((he started the game voting and talking normally
he asked rvs questions and answered his own
he is coasting because no one will pressure him))

3) lapsa's actions all benefit scum
((changing every discussion when it gets productive
refusing to exlpain himself ever
somehow ending up on the monkey wagon as if my magic
etc.))

at the very least this guy is anti-town
at most, scum

[MonkeyMan576]

So let's see. Katie's scum for:
1. having opinions inside the first 100 posts.
2. not jumping when Mr. Anime whistles
3. OMGUS
4. not making sense (to mr. anime)

I know where my vote's going! This is so exciting!

p-edit clearly

For clarity, I'm scumreading Luca first because of his terrible vote on Lapsa, then his terrible OMGUS on me. I'm scumreading Wake for focusing on silly stuff like how much fluff should be allowed in a game, and Anen because he wasn't just posting fluff, he was looking for things to talk about that were irrelevant to the game. Like, instead of discussing the game.

I mean, he voted Lapsa for 'fluffposting more than Anen' and 'poorly justifying his vote on Anen' which happened before Anen had even posted, and was pretty clearly a RVS vote. Even if Lapsa had done any of the things Luca was talking about, none of them would be alignment indicative.

He's scumreading me for calling Lapsa probtown, but dollars to doughnuts if I hadn't clarified that my feelings are as strong as p5 allows, he'd be scumreading me for having feelings too strong for day 1.

He's scumreading me for not hopping to answer him (which is not indicative of scum), scumreading me for a misunderstanding of my feelings on my suspects (even if his thoughts were accurate, this would not be indicative of scum), for 'not making any sense' (which is not indicative of scum), and for being dismissive of his reasons for scumreading me (which he hasn't yet presented.)

Pretty obviously scum looking for a day1 mislynch that involves a lot of words but not reasons. As soon as everyone has posted, I'd be glad to turbolynch him.

p-edit: but not having any reasons for scumreading me totally doesn't make his vote OMGUS. Totally.

Any time she posts anything with content it is about how terrible everyone's reads on her are. She hardly ever posts anything about anyone else.
---------------

[Lapsa]

I need to catch up on a few pages, but I definitely prefer a Lapsa lynch to a Monkey one right now.

UNVOTE:

VOTE: Lapsa

What else could have been gleaned from some people wrongly thinking I might not be sthar8?

[droog]

its like hes saying
'im useless
im not going to play
haha neener neener cant touch me'

[MonkeyMan576]

Vote: Lapsa

This seems like our best chance at actually lynching scum today.

[Lapsa]

Monkey

and what's obvious about me that makes me equally obvscum to

DominoBars

?

That's a bad reason not to change your vote, if you think lapsa or Ill is scummier than me.

In two hours—should nothing change—I'd quite like to discuss

Monkey's

absence regarding #583.

[MonkeyMan576]

@Curious, if you change your vote to Lapsa, that will make the two wagons equal in size, and maybe we can pick up a few more votes to get the lynch. Especially if Pac and Wake decide to go with us(which they should).

[Lapsa]

its like hes saying
'im useless
im not going to play
haha neener neener cant touch me'

balloons

[MonkeyMan576]

Monkey

and what's obvious about me that makes me equally obvscum to

DominoBars

?

That's a bad reason not to change your vote, if you think lapsa or Ill is scummier than me.

In two hours—should nothing change—I'd quite like to discuss

Monkey's

absence regarding #583.

Your lack of content in your posts, your refusal to scumhunt, your buddying with Illl, etc.

[Lapsa]

I asked Monkey to provide a particular post where he deemed that katie was being defensive/emotional (scummy) which made him vote her (had to ask twice). He said all of her posts, i asked him for one in particular and he has again not provided one.

Do you think these actions from Monkey are from someone who is town and really believes his case?

Monkey

why do you ignore

DoucheDog

?

[MonkeyMan576]

I didn't, I just posted re Katie.

[Lapsa]

He said all of her posts, i asked him for one in particular and he has again not provided one.

I didn't, I just posted re Katie.

Not this time. Previous one:

give me an example post (dont say every post) where you think Katie is being defensive (and clearly scummy).

[Wake1]

I have limited time.

Do we have anything pertinent as of yet? Very brief summaries of the latest highlights would suffice. Not reading 25 pages of Day 1 speculation.

[MonkeyMan576]

I gave an example post.

[MonkeyMan576]

Lapsa and Ill are both providing poor content and buddying up. Katie is being over reactive and not focusing on anyone else. Lapsa seems to be the best lynch option, although the scum think I am.

[llll]

Monkey's desperately lurching from vote to vote to vote searching for the most viable counterwagon. It's pretty funny.

[Wake1]

Lapsa's annoying in general. Him being gone would be nice, but would that be best for Town?

Dunno about Sthar. He's being over-reactive? In what way? Not sure if that's normal for him.

[MonkeyMan576]

@Illl: There's nothing wrong with switching votes between people that are consistantly on your scum list. Yes, I want a lynch that's not me, because I know I'm not scum. If you would join the lapsa wagon and stop buddying with him then vote switching wouldn't be necessary.

[Lapsa]

I gave an example post.

exactly

why are you telling that only now?

why that's not on #606?

instead you ignore

DoucheDog

and once again state it's all of

my

posts

He said all of her posts, i asked him for one in particular and he has again not provided one.

Any time she posts anything with content it is about how terrible everyone's reads on her are. She hardly ever posts anything about anyone else.

[MonkeyMan576]

Lapsa's annoying in general. Him being gone would be nice, but would that be best for Town?

Dunno about Sthar. He's being over-reactive? In what way? Not sure if that's normal for him.

I'd prefer not to focus on Katie and focus on Lapsa, but I've posted my case on Katie.