Greetings, mongrels.
It seems the gods have decided that my duty is to grace you all with my presence in this laughable excuse for entertainment you call a "mafia game".
Very well. I shall allow you all to entertain me.
In post 7, Andrius wrote:Spurn not the Old Food Gods, and they will forget thee not, my son. Remember that the Great Smoked Halibut in the Sky sees your pain and will reward his loyal faithful sons.
Hmph. You filthy lowlifes dare worship this "halibut" as opposed to your one true king?!
In post 20, Andrius wrote:The Great Smoked Halibut does not shirk when the enemy so willingly presents itself.
Oh... I see. You claim to be a god of some kind. Only a mongrel would delude himself with such grandeur.
Well, well, well... This is
quite
interesting. Someone who knows not to concern themselves with the insignificant. I think I can overlook some of your transgressions.
In post 66, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Take note, Iecerint and Nacho are historically some of my closest allies and favorite players, and Pine has quickly reached the same status in the few games I've been with him this year.
It appears I was mistaken. One as revered as yourself need not associate themselves with mongrels. You disappoint me, ABR.
In post 68, Pine wrote:ABR who gives a shit what people think of us, he's scum
I am inclined to agree. Perhaps not a member of the mafia per se, but scum indeed.
In post 73, Albert B. Rampage wrote:Gentlemen, let's be reasonable. Voting for me for being complimentary and expressing my approval of you is like feeding your dog when he's begging for food while you're eating. You're not reinforcing the behavior you want to elicit here.
Comparing yourself to a dog... how trite. I grow bored of you.
While I consider sex one of the great pleasures of this world, I find the attempts at erotic literature devoid of any effort or imagination. This is no way to entertain your king. Play the fool correctly or dismiss yourselves from my presence.
I also grow weary of Southern Gothic's concern with her own well-being (
123). Only someone with the unholiest confessions fears the priest. Farside acting as the sinner (
130) interests me, however.
In post 132, Konowa wrote:It has more to do with when you tunnel you can't see the Holy Grail past the carrot on the end of the stick your blinders are so narrow.
Hah! Mongrel, you know nothing of the Grail.
Iecerint's choice of language interests me.
137 - "not interested in lynching her on the grounds that...";
142 - "now that I have been directed to look at it". This feels... unnatural.
It seems this game is finally beginning to provide me with sufficient entertainment.
In post 149, Southern Gothic wrote:
I am quite actually confused as to WHY you think she is scum!
cos I don't see how she is avoiding us when she is asking for tth. and I find it strange that you are saying that she is voting not trying to sort motivation when I think that albert's posts are way the fuck more indicative of that.
selective scumhunting is selective scumhunting.
How amusing - one sinner defending another. I don't see why you would change your vote considering your past comments on ABR.
Konowa seems to mean well. I am willing to take his side in this matter.
All is Who is causing me great joy in his antics. Take note, mongrels - this is how you play the fool. Aside from that, he appears to be relatively unimportant.
In post 204, Southern Gothic wrote:I think Flames has a good chance of being scum.
Post 87,
Post 90, and
Post 92 all discuss forming reads from the first few pages, specifically Nacho's read on ABR and Andrius' read on Iecerint. On the surface it mimics the group dynamic in form and subject, but the questioning is awkward and stilted because it's very static. The contrarianism in the posts doesn't really leave anywhere for the conversation to go because Flames never bothers to talk about specifics or pinpoint what
exact
problems he has with the reads. As such, it's very unlikely these posts would elicit a productive response. There's also not much critical evaluation of the reads going on, evidenced by the fact he misstated Nacho's argument ("I don't find explaining something indicative of alignment."). This leads me to the conclusion that the posts are for the purpose of looking participatory and trying not to set off any alarm bells.
Could you please develop your scum read on Iecerint a little more, Flames?
Well, well. You seem to take issue with my predecessor. He states quite clearly that he doesn't have a townread on Iecerint - but this does not imply he holds a scumread. I'm concerned with the fact that Southern Gothic is so hung up on minute details (including
207 on this page alone) and their attempt at misrepresenting Flames. Perhaps it is because of my subconscious bias to my game slot, but I'm not comfortable with their actions here.
Here is Iec's entrance post, which I believe the explanation comment is referring to:
I had to clarify something with the mod before I was comfortable posting. The flavor had thrown me off a little. This is not a crumb for anything.
211 is useless drivel. Do not waste my time with such arrogant posting in the future.
I have read ten pages of the game and have come to the following conclusions:
Southern Gothic - scum
Iecerint - scum
farside - interesting
Konowa (now Titus?) - town
ABR - town
Andrius - town
All Is Who, Peregrine, Victor, Nacho, Pine, 4Trouble - null
