Wake,
50 – need I think anything? On page 2? (I have a theory about those players who're voting for fluff-players but I'm not sure whether it works at all.)
Lapsa,
51 – Yes, he's super cute little kitty, although he weighs 7 kg (15.5 lbs). And he's the best piece of fluff to share our bed with. ^_^
Luca,
64 – did I miss something? Lapsa changed his random vote on Page1... And yes, he's fluffing more than me which is rare indeed. (Although, keep in mind that by the time he gave a reason for his vote he had already changed it.)
Wake,
68 –
"...on a side note, to be safe, I think we should assume we're dealing with a 10:3 Setup."
– Or a 9:3:1 or a 9:2:2. We don't know anything right now, I suppose.
Katie,
78,
"As of right now, I'd probably wagon Luca, Wake, or Anen. Wake being the weakest vote of the three."
– Whut? And Lapsa is probably town... is it only me who thinks that she just mentioned four of the players who had a significant amount of posts at that time?
Luca & Katie, around
89 and later – well, Luca has a point there and it seems that Katie evades giving a proper answer. Hmmm...
Katie,
103, well, it's best to quote it
Katie wrote:
For clarity, I'm scumreading Luca first because of his terrible vote on Lapsa, then his terrible OMGUS on me. I'm scumreading Wake for focusing on silly stuff like how much fluff should be allowed in a game, and Anen because he wasn't just posting fluff, he was looking for things to talk about that were irrelevant to the game. Like, instead of discussing the game.
Whyttyfyck?
Luca did not OMGUS you.
Your read on Wake and on me contradicts each other to a certain extent. It's no matter that Wake was posting a fluff there too (with that aligator or whytwysyt), but calling me scum because of fluffing is just lol, you know ^_^
Katie,
110 – whom did you want to turbolynch? Luca? Well, advocating a turbolynch against anyone on Page 5 is not a good gameplay (unless someone preformed a blatant scum-slip, but that didn't happen).
Sthar,
112 – lol, hi there! Are you in this game too? I didn't see you in the playerlist... or is Katie your alt? I suppose.
Katie,
129 – Ckd is not the only one who parks his random vote on someone... why do you care about him?
Wake,
138 –
"What credible meta do we have on sthar8, if any?"
– I daresay, I don't think a scum-Sthar would start a game like this. (I haven't played with his alts yet, only with his main, though.) On the other hand, Sthar must know that I start almost every games with fluffing...
TL;DR version: it looks as if I had firm reads but, to tell the truth, I don't have any good reads right now. (Even if I know that it doesn't sound too town-ish.)
Playing as an alt cannot be indicative of alignment. Unless you're accusing me