In post 11, MonkeyMan576 wrote:@Anen: Is that a serious vote or a random vote?
isn't it quite obvious?
In post 11, MonkeyMan576 wrote:@Anen: Is that a serious vote or a random vote?
In post 16, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I don't believe in obvious when it comes to mafia. Any question is a good question. You never know how someone will answer.
In post 19, Lapsa wrote:@evilpacman18 is that you playing piano?
In post 20, MonkeyMan576 wrote:In post 18, evilpacman18 wrote:In post 16, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I don't believe in obvious when it comes to mafia. Any question is a good question. You never know how someone will answer.
Then why did you single him out over anyone else who made a presumably "random" vote?
Because I thought it might not be random.
In post 352, droog wrote:changing your mind as the game progresses
shows willing to lynch anybody
and is scummy
as opposed to being consistent
we could do this all day monkey
whatsy our point
In post 391, Luca Blight wrote:Pacman
He doesn't participate in RVS himself- instead choosing to question Monkey's question of Anen's vote, over whether it was random or not. Pacman's question was pretty counter-productive, and even if Monkey's question was pretty stupid, why not just let it play out? It feels like he is finding an easy way to settle into the game, as RVS can be awkward for some as Mafia.
In post 438, curiouskarmadog wrote:In post 431, Aneninen wrote:In post 418, Lapsa wrote:I likeMonkey'sfluency of thought.
Will unvote for now.
vote: MonkeyMan576
????!!
Just why, Lapsa, why?!?
Keep producing shytty posts and shytty context for your votes and you're get lynched because of them. Possible scum or possible useless townie, that's my read on you right now.
(Reading the latest posts thoroughly and answering them will happen later; need to go to work right now.)
wait arent you voting Monkeyman too? if Monkeyman flips town, this post gets scum points.
In post 787, Aeronaut wrote:Hmm.....
Some of Pacman's posts are really bothering me.
For example, Pacman, in post 537, you say that you're "not into the monkey lynch anymore".What I'd like to know is: What brought on this change of heart,but more importantly, why have you suddenly changed your mind and voted for him today?
In post 731, evilpacman18 wrote:I really wanna play rn but I'm so tired. But I think I'm suspicious of anyone trying to analyze the Luca kill. In fact it's a really good kill because it's hard to trace. I'm gonna reread and try to reorient my scum reads since Luca was my top one but the vote on Anen will stay for now.
This post is terrible.
First of all, why are you suspicious of anybody who tries to analyze the kill? This to me just looks like a mob boss trying to silence anybody who asks to many questions.
More importantly, though: In this post, you say that you're suspicious of anybody who tries to analyze the kill,and then you proceed to analyze the kill.
Explain.
In post 1043, Gendaberry wrote:In post 892, evilpacman18 wrote:I do think IIII is town though, if anything because switching a vote within 40 minutes or whatever Genda's accusation is looks annoying and anti-town but is usually indicative of lack of certainty which is of course super town. So now the IIII wagon looks bad and I'm thinking maybe droog and Aeronaut are scum buddies.
unvote
Pacman how did |||| go from being town to the most likely scum on Monkey's wagon? I'm really not sure where that came from.
In post 1057, llll wrote:@epm I'm surprised you're not continuing your scumreading against Aeronaut. Just think - if you get rid of Aeronaut today, both the peeps who voted against you yesterday would be gone!
In post 43, Riddleton wrote:
In post 191, Riddleton wrote:
In post 239, Riddleton wrote:
In post 314, Riddleton wrote:
In post 401, Riddleton wrote:
In post 517, Riddleton wrote:
In post 547, Riddleton wrote:
In post 732, Riddleton wrote:
In post 799, Riddleton wrote:
In post 903, Riddleton wrote:
In post 958, Riddleton wrote:
In post 1027, Riddleton wrote:
In post 1129, Aeronaut wrote:In post 1116, evilpacman18 wrote:My plan is to drop all of my reads and try to go into what I'm about to do with as little presupposition about what I already think about the game so that I can first analyze Monkey's play and votes on him as objectively as possible, and then see how he interacted with players and how people interacted with him. This VCA will not yet take into account peoples' posting and reasoning for their votes, I first just want to see whose voting footprint seems tunnelly, weirdly associated with Monkey, or too flaky.
"My plan is to completely contradict everything I've said thus far, in order to gain town cred"
We're on day 3, and you're sitting here analyzing RVS votes. Are you seriously giving Ckd towncred for being voted by Monkey during RVS? Hint: RVS does not stand for "Relevant Vote Stage"
To be clear, what is said during RVS is relevant. The votes alone are not.
Are you asserting that they are scum because they unvoted? Because one flipped town, and you said llll was town like three sentences ago.
And now, llll is town again, after being certain scum a few paragraphs ago.
So, you're telling me that Wake coming from nowhere and just voting monkey for voting him is less scummy to you than me, voting for the person who I wanted dead all game?
I'm not even voting Katie right now, I'm voting you, ya dingus.
That whole case was contradictory, mainly fluff, and barely about Katie, yet, Katie is suddenly scum above all else.
In post 1144, Gendaberry wrote:
@Pacman
Did you only just now discover that CKD has been on Monkey the whole game? If you think that CKD's level of certainty was scummy, why didn't you point it out sooner considering that he's been tunneling monkey extremly hard for most of the game?
In post 893, evilpacman18 wrote:ckd, don't get tunnelly. consider Aeronaut or droog scum if you get a chance. just consider, idk how I feel about it yet either.