In post 5598, Thor665 wrote:You find that to be a valid and fair tell?
I found his state of mind to be inconsistent with someone who claims to have just caught 3 scum.
So why are you voting him?
In post 5598, Thor665 wrote:You find that to be a valid and fair tell?
In post 5586, AxleGreaser wrote:I wish to point out, you are explicitly claiming to know the reasons I do things are bad/shit/whatever
yet here you explicitly state you dont know where I did in fact explain that.
In post 5588, Flubbernugget wrote:Nero is there a reason you keep screaming that axle is town but like the iz wagon more?
In post 5591, Thor665 wrote:So you agree with me, then, that he is fairly clearly not a Werewolf - so you really wish to lynch someone who is 50% cleared at this stage?
In post 5246, AxleGreaser wrote:yeah if i am wrong about beast, I expect significant amounts of my current reads to change.
In post 5569, AxleGreaser wrote:You claimed I was against VCA which I said was made up bullshit which is why i crossed it out
In post 5531, AxleGreaser wrote:@SHiro
In post 5530, Nero Cain wrote:I think the chances that scum waste three shots on a player are fairly slim.
given the alternative is shoot three guys each with a vote, or take the risk that when leaving boon alive until endgame and wondering if this will happen
In post 5405, Boonskiies wrote:We're getting to the point where I believe I'm going to actually start becoming a strong town player in this game.
In post 4330, Boonskiies wrote:I actually start to become a pretty strong town player mid-game.
I also find this hilariously bad. I mean I am highly doubtful that scum would go "oh Boon said he's going to become a good player, we better kill that ASAP!" looks like some whiteknighting to me.
best idea is just play mafia and try to read the guys alignment the old fashioned way.
In post 5492, AxleGreaser wrote:You have studiously, avoided analysisng the actual thread,
In post 5601, Nero Cain wrote:Me not agreeing with you and thinking that something is not town motivated=//=me knowing you said that. I didn't see that and/or forgot.
In post 5492, AxleGreaser wrote:As Beast didnt flip scum, then all the pre flip associative stuff I thought I was seeing was not there.
In post 5601, Nero Cain wrote:
He is still scumreading me (but as a wolf) and two lurksacks. And one of those two lurksacks were being voted by mafia so it makes me think TSO is less likely to be mafia. So to me it has an air of not mafia hunting.
In post 5602, Nero Cain wrote:If you aren't against VCA why did you feel the need to discredit my use of VCA?
In post 5604, Nero Cain wrote:What am I avoiding analyzing? How do you think we should be looking for scum?
In post 5604, Nero Cain wrote:Can you remind me why you unvoted Beast.
Why did you not vote Ren when you unvoted Beast?
In post 5608, Nero Cain wrote:but also saying "As Beast didnt flip scum, then all the pre flip associative stuff I thought I was seeing was not there." Is actually proving my point that nothing changed for you.
In post 5604, Nero Cain wrote:Can you remind me why you unvoted Beast.
Why did you not vote Ren when you unvoted Beast?
In post 5316, AxleGreaser wrote: (2)and finally I really would prefer to lynch another WW over a maf today.
(1)however it is time
UNVOTE: Beast
Note I really might vote him again, (1)but I reckon I have as much good info as i can reasonably expect to get. Time to re-evaluate the day from scratch.
In post 5609, AxleGreaser wrote:The stuff I was getting from thinking I had caught beast as WW was re evaluated.
I suggest you define what on earth nothing means for you as the above is explicitly stating what did change. and you define something the thing that changed as nothing. WTF.
In post 5609, AxleGreaser wrote:
In post 5604, Nero Cain wrote:Can you remind me why you unvoted Beast.
Why did you not vote Ren when you unvoted Beast?
Well I would just direct you the thread but you already both claimed and demonstrated you dont read it or claim not to remember it...
and in truth, even though it is right there where i unvoted him) you need to read little between the lines
In post 5316, AxleGreaser wrote: (2)and finally I really would prefer to lynch another WW over a maf today.
(1)however it is time
UNVOTE: Beast
Note I really might vote him again, (1)but I reckon I have as much good info as i can reasonably expect to get. Time to re-evaluate the day from scratch.
(1) yes shock horror on day when the claimed to be town cophad claimed really early for no particularly good reason, I had tried to milk the day for other associative tells and make an actual contested wagon out of it.
(2) and look here is me consistently indicating a desire to lynch the short stacked faction yet again...
and so yes this "it is time" gave the green light to any towny standing around with the hands in their pockets giving me space to play,that the day could end the day.
Also please start explaining how any of this shit you want to discuss but never even bother looking in my filter for is alignment indicative at all?
In post 5600, AxleGreaser wrote:I found his state of mind to be inconsistent with someone who claims to have just caught 3 scum.
So why are you voting him?
In post 5246, AxleGreaser wrote:yeah if i am wrong aboutbeast, I expect significant amounts of my current reads to change.
WRONG
I expect significant amounts of my current reads to change
In post 5611, Thor665 wrote:because I see no need to explain it beyond admission of the reality in front of you.
In post 5610, Nero Cain wrote:So you started to doubt your scumread on Beast?
In post 5610, Nero Cain wrote:
Also please start explaining how any of this shit you want to discuss but never even bother looking in my filter for is alignment indicative at all?
I'm an eternal optimist. Like I really don't think you are town and I'm hoping that our arguments will help convince Thor and whomever else doubts you are scum that you are scum.
In post 5614, AxleGreaser wrote:
as that is not what the words say... not sure why you are claiming it is.
In post 5615, AxleGreaser wrote:In post 5610, Nero Cain wrote:
Also please start explaining how any of this shit you want to discuss but never even bother looking in my filter for is alignment indicative at all?
I'm an eternal optimist. Like I really don't think you are town and I'm hoping that our arguments will help convince Thor and whomever else doubts you are scum that you are scum.
Ah
so while you are not actually arguing or stating that I am scum or the th9ings you mention are alignment indicative,
you are just eternally optimistic, that just the argument itself will help convince them.
AKA a hail mary?
If you have nothing else then that is playing the game i suppose.
In post 5618, Nero Cain wrote: <----my face after learning that DGB replaced into a game with hoods after making a big fuss about games with hoods.
In post 5611, Thor665 wrote:2. Why do I do anything? I will admit I've been selling Flubber quite a bit while voting Pine. Really that's up to you to interpret, because I see no need to explain it beyond admission of the reality in front of you.
In post 3841, Aegor wrote:Votecount 2.10
[5]Thor665:goodmorning, Izariael, reinoe, Flubbernugget, Garmr
[4]Garmr:Scripten, AxleGreaser, Slandaar, Shiro
[2]Flubbernugget:Nero Cain, The Fonz
[1]Boonskiies:T S O
[1]davesaz:TierShift
[1]goodmorning:Thor665
[1]reinoe:Boonskiies
[2]Not Voting:beastcharizard, davesaz
With 17 alive, it takes 9 to lynch.
Day 2 deadline:(expired on 2014-11-19 18:27:52)
Mod Notes
Searching for replacements for T S O and Garmr -- TELL YOUR FRIENDS
In post 5617, Nero Cain wrote:I know that you are ESL but that's a question mark which means its a question. You can pay me later for the English lesson.
(2)But to be honest I DID take it as you maybe doubting your scumread on him 'cause I don't see why you'd unvote someone you clearly thought was scum.
In post 5622, AxleGreaser wrote:I unvoted Beast so as to indicate to town, unequivocally, I was cool with a Reinoe lynch even though I preferred a Beast one.. for the reasons stated.
In post 5622, AxleGreaser wrote:Again are you at any point going to explain how any of your question is alignment indicative... or are you just hoping we dont lynch Pine today?
What is your opinion on the Pine Lynch?
My previous cases on Pine?