Robbery! At The Casino (Game Over)


User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23692
Joined: April 10, 2014
Location: Liverpool, UK

Post Post #2000 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 10:52 am

Post by BlueBloodedToffee »

Holy shit.

So I've quickly read what's happened so far toDay and it seems everyone is happy to lynch me. Well, that's just fantastic.

If I'm right, everyone has been posting/online since Fish voted me, which means Fish has to be scum. Which is disappointing because I really wanted to lynch Ika today and Fish/Ika makes no sense as a scum-team.

The fact Ika hasn't voted me yet makes me think that Titus was right and he is town.

I can see now why Fish wanted Titus lynched so badly. He knew my claim would come under scrutiny and he could use that to his advantage.

The comment Fish wrote about scum being powerful; an unlimited ninja pretty much guarantees scum are pretty powerful, no? In fact, only Egg and myself were capable of avoiding being killed. Egg had BP and I could leave for two nights.

I love how everyone is completely ignoring the fact I wanted Nati's lynch since his slots very first post. I pursued that lynch for 3 fucking days. 3 fucking days until people decided to start listening to me. But oh no, that doesn't mean shit.

I'm gonna read again now and address individual posts.
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
User avatar
Formerfish
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
User avatar
User avatar
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
Busboy Revolutionary
Posts: 12855
Joined: July 1, 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post Post #2001 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 10:54 am

Post by Formerfish »

Well, the person I was voting wasn't getting lynched. We had 2 people that were vla through the deadline. Others put forth a decent reason to lynch Nati (reasons that you yourself quoted me saying earlier in the game fwiw). And we were a few days away from deadline. Read my scum games, thats not the way I bus.
User avatar
Formerfish
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
User avatar
User avatar
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
Busboy Revolutionary
Posts: 12855
Joined: July 1, 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post Post #2002 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 10:55 am

Post by Formerfish »

How does it make me scum to have a vote on you?
ika
ika
Survivor
ika
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11656
Joined: December 13, 2013

Post Post #2003 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 10:56 am

Post by ika »

In post 1996, Doctor Who wrote:
In post 1980, ika wrote:
In post 1979, Doctor Who wrote:Maybe it is Fish and BBT


why are you not voting either of them then?


LYLO. I'm risk adverse by nature.

How sure are you?


sell heres how it is right now:

FF is voting
me/GC/you have all been posting during this time frame


so it falls to 2 assumptions:

BBT is scum
or
FF is scum who needs a town voter so his buddy can hammer

what is the more likly scnario?

pedit:

@doc

i already have my thoughts, i want to hear from BBT, you already gave me the premissi that im town so if you want to back down from that i will tubovote you

@fish

yes and? it also allows to avoid the ninja and probablly any other role that exists in scums?

pedit2: well BBT joins the fray. i cant wait to see this unfold

im gonna wait this out
User avatar
Formerfish
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
User avatar
User avatar
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
Busboy Revolutionary
Posts: 12855
Joined: July 1, 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post Post #2004 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 10:58 am

Post by Formerfish »

I am saying that with what has flipped so far a commuter doesnt fit for me.
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23692
Joined: April 10, 2014
Location: Liverpool, UK

Post Post #2005 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 10:58 am

Post by BlueBloodedToffee »

In post 1945, ika wrote:
In post 997, Natirasha wrote:Fiiine but if you're wrong I'm gonna say I told ya so!

VOTE: Desperado

What about BBT?


i rand isoing again.....

this looks mighty intresting

anyone want to say what it could mean?

Ika, what do you make of Nati trying to get me lynched? I think that was all she contributed the entire game.
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23692
Joined: April 10, 2014
Location: Liverpool, UK

Post Post #2006 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:00 am

Post by BlueBloodedToffee »

In post 2002, Formerfish wrote:How does it make me scum to have a vote on you?

Because I haven't been lynched yet?

If you're town, that means both scum are in Ika, GC and Who. Which means I would have been hammered and scum would have won given they are all here and posting.

You have to be scum.
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #2007 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:01 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1970, Formerfish wrote:Follow me boys!

Vote BBT

Oh shit I just realized this is FF and not Doctor.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
ika
ika
Survivor
ika
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11656
Joined: December 13, 2013

Post Post #2008 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:02 am

Post by ika »

the fact BBT didnt cross vote is what troubles me.

however i still want to wait for this to settle

pedit:

i could do the wifomy answer and say she was distancing?

catchup first and then ask.

pedti2:

im going to be that guy and also say that the same goes to you bbt.

cross vote him at least if your that confident (in b4 i get accused again)

pedtid3: wut?
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #2009 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:03 am

Post by Green Crayons »

What about a lack of a cross vote troubles you?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23692
Joined: April 10, 2014
Location: Liverpool, UK

Post Post #2010 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:03 am

Post by BlueBloodedToffee »

VOTE: Fish
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #2011 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:04 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 2007, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 1970, Formerfish wrote:Follow me boys!

Vote BBT

Oh shit I just realized this is FF and not Doctor.

I was mostly just seeing Doctor and ika post at this time, and I didn't realize that FF had actually joined in, and thought that this post was Doctor's.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23692
Joined: April 10, 2014
Location: Liverpool, UK

Post Post #2012 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:04 am

Post by BlueBloodedToffee »

NK analysis is interesting.
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
ika
ika
Survivor
ika
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11656
Joined: December 13, 2013

Post Post #2013 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:05 am

Post by ika »

it looks like we are all here to talk now so the current gamestate:

we know there is most likely a scum in the BBT/FF pair


GC suspects DR/???
DR suspects BBT/FF (correct em if wrong)
I suspect FF/DR
BBT suspects FF/???

am i missing anything? seeing how we are here we can have a nice dicussion

pedit:

GC: it troubles me cuz usally my first gut instincts is to immediately cross-vote
User avatar
Formerfish
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
User avatar
User avatar
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
Busboy Revolutionary
Posts: 12855
Joined: July 1, 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post Post #2014 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:07 am

Post by Formerfish »

In post 2006, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 2002, Formerfish wrote:How does it make me scum to have a vote on you?

Because I haven't been lynched yet?

If you're town, that means both scum are in Ika, GC and Who. Which means I would have been hammered and scum would have won given they are all here and posting.

You have to be scum.


Or I am right and you are scum. Different strokes.
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23692
Joined: April 10, 2014
Location: Liverpool, UK

Post Post #2015 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:07 am

Post by BlueBloodedToffee »

In post 1963, Green Crayons wrote:I paused my ISO review because yawn.

In post 1959, Doctor Who wrote:What do you think about Fish, specifically his Nati vote?

From my POV, if there was a bus on Nati it was either BBT or FF. I doubt it was BBT because he was the one who actually convinced me to get back to the Nati vote. So if there was a bus on Nati, FF is it.

I'm glad someone is paying attention to what's happened in this game.

Fish/Who for scum is where I'm at right now.
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #2016 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:08 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Well the only thing against BBT is his role, frankly.

shos' suspicions, FF's looks-like-a-bus vote, and his not awesome ISO makes him the more likely scum candidate.


I've got plans this evening, so I'll try to check in, but my vote will be going onto FF unless if some crazy revelation pops up that I catch when phone skimming.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #2017 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:09 am

Post by Green Crayons »

@ika:
at this point, it's FF and Doctor.

I guess there's a non-zero chance that FF and BBT are both scum, but I don't think that's the likely situation.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23692
Joined: April 10, 2014
Location: Liverpool, UK

Post Post #2018 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:09 am

Post by BlueBloodedToffee »

In post 2014, Formerfish wrote:
Or I am right and you are scum. Different strokes.

Given you didn't even realise the situation we were in, I find it hard to see that coming from a town perspective.
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
User avatar
Formerfish
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
User avatar
User avatar
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
Busboy Revolutionary
Posts: 12855
Joined: July 1, 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post Post #2019 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:10 am

Post by Formerfish »

In post 2018, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 2014, Formerfish wrote:
Or I am right and you are scum. Different strokes.

Given you didn't even realise the situation we were in, I find it hard to see that coming from a town perspective.


The fuck does this mean?
ika
ika
Survivor
ika
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11656
Joined: December 13, 2013

Post Post #2020 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:11 am

Post by ika »

In post 2013, ika wrote:GC suspects DR/???
DR suspects BBT/FF (correct me if wrong)
I suspect FF/DR
BBT suspects FF/DR


hmmm even with this updated list there seems to be a lot of FF/DR overlap yet the votes lay elsewhere (looks at FF)

pedit: ya its most likely FF/DR right now but i want to see how this plays out

DR "analysis" on FF looks what i would say "knowledgeable"
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23692
Joined: April 10, 2014
Location: Liverpool, UK

Post Post #2021 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:12 am

Post by BlueBloodedToffee »

In post 1984, Green Crayons wrote:
lol, this might be a bit much.

But. "Tourist" implies BBT is visiting our casino. A tourist isn't a permanent residence of the town/casino. And "leaving town" in this game would actually be leaving the casino. So a tourist wouldn't "leave <the casino>" every so often, because a tourist actually
visits
the casino. A tourist leaves his town in bumblefuck America to visit the casino.

The directional aspect of the flavor and the mechanics are backwards.

I understand what you're saying here.

I can only assume I'm staying
at
the casino and can leave the casino for two nights.
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
User avatar
Formerfish
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
User avatar
User avatar
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
Busboy Revolutionary
Posts: 12855
Joined: July 1, 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post Post #2022 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:12 am

Post by Formerfish »

In post 2020, ika wrote:
In post 2013, ika wrote:GC suspects DR/???
DR suspects BBT/FF (correct me if wrong)
I suspect FF/DR
BBT suspects FF/DR


hmmm even with this updated list there seems to be a lot of FF/DR overlap yet the votes lay elsewhere (looks at FF)

pedit: ya its most likely FF/DR right now but i want to see how this plays out

DR "analysis" on FF looks what i would say "knowledgeable"


So what, I'm supposed to change my vote now based off what other chucklefucks think?
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #2023 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:14 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 2018, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:
In post 2014, Formerfish wrote:
Or I am right and you are scum. Different strokes.

Given you didn't even realise the situation we were in, I find it hard to see that coming from a town perspective.

I'd be interested in you teasing this out a bit more. I don't quite follow.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23692
Joined: April 10, 2014
Location: Liverpool, UK

Post Post #2024 (ISO) » Thu Nov 13, 2014 11:14 am

Post by BlueBloodedToffee »

In post 1994, Doctor Who wrote:
Found the claim, came when he was the leading wagon with 3 votes (had four, but GC moved off of him to Nati).

BBT was under pressure at the time, as scum a fakeclaim would have kept him in the game longer.

Well, isn't this just opportunistic.

I claimed on my own free will. I didn't
have
to claim and I certainly wasn't under pressure.
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.

Return to “Completed Mini Theme Games”