In post 3447, Garmr wrote:i'm town but I really don't want to play this game and I can't be bothered hunting. SO going to let you guys if you want to mislynch me or for me to replace out.
This...This is pure AtE BS
In post 3447, Garmr wrote:i'm town but I really don't want to play this game and I can't be bothered hunting. SO going to let you guys if you want to mislynch me or for me to replace out.
In post 3445, Garmr wrote:I'm fine if everyone one shifts their votes on me if they promise to lynch axle after I flip town.
In post 3447, Garmr wrote:i'm town but I really don't want to play this game and I can't be bothered hunting. SO going to let you guys if you want to mislynch me or for me to replace out.
In post 3447, Garmr wrote:i'm town but I really don't want to play this game and Ican't be bothered hunting. SO going to let you guys if you want to mislynch me or for me to replace out.
In post 3454, TierShift wrote:okay garmr replaced out we can go back to thor now.
In post 3457, TierShift wrote:well, his thought process does make serious sense for town that is replacing out.
In post 3457, TierShift wrote:well, his thought process does make serious sense for town that is replacing out.
In post 3416, Slandaar wrote:In post 3391, AxleGreaser wrote:Garmr: has before this point in the game claimed I am 85% likely to flip scum (2788)
swapped his vote onto and even stronger scum read 2941
So according to Garmr, he has found two scum and is > 85% confident both will flip scum (claims Boon > Axle == 85% scum)
The number is arbitrary it is just there to be representative of him being quite confident in each being scum.
Regarding calling your case bad instead of fabricated etc it literally means nothing. I really don't see anything in that at all; I have said my scumread's arguments/cases are bad in the past well I probably use the word terrible mostly but it's the same thing.
The wagon thing is actually really good.
I didn't really 'get' what you were saying prior. Kinda read it and went ugh nothing wrong with saying that and moved on. Maybe the focus on it made me pay the extra attention... Bite sized chunks work wonders.
You have my axe good sir.
VOTE: Garmr
I will respond to all this GM stuff later...
In post 3369, Nero Cain wrote:In post 3146, TierShift wrote:In post 3116, Nero Cain wrote:but Muffin is prob scum too. Like that whole asking Muffin for his opinion on me 'cause he wanted to understand why we had different opinions on Boons looked really forced and manufactured.
+
neither of them are following up at all.
What are you talking about here? Can you give me post numbers?
Well, in 2990 Flubber asks for opinions on me. At first I thought this a general call out and just asking everyone for their option of but according to him he was just asking Muffin but its not like that really makes it any better 'cause why would you give a shit about others opinions unless you think a slot is scum or you are doubting your read? But no, he continued to call me town so I really really don't understand why he wants an opinion on me. This aslso came across as slightly OMGUSy 'cause here I am starting to doubt Flubber as town and his next post is asking for opinions on me wich again, I don't understand why he'd want opinions on his town read.
Then in 2998 he claims that his reason for asking an opinion on me is 'cause he was interested in why Muffin and I had different reads on Boons. Well ok....but what does that have to do with anything? Does he secretly think that I'm scummy for not wanting a Boons lynch today? Maybe I missed it but why didn't he ask why Muffin was voting Boons, if Muffin had not already claimed why.
So to me it looked like a throwaway argument meant to look like he was doing something but wasn't actually doing anything. So yeah, I thought this was some forced scumbuddy interaction.
Can you explain to me what you think flubber was trying to accomplish here?
In post 3461, TierShift wrote:Saying he is caught scum is quite an overstatement, anyway.
Let's just go for thor.
In post 3462, TierShift wrote:You seem to have dropped your thor 'guardian angel' act. Why is that?
In post 3356, Slandaar wrote:I am very sure Thor is town. I feel like he tried so hard yesterday and fell flat with the PV flip so came into today with a more relaxed attitude and voted Shiro which was fine. He then says something about Shiro not doing anything for ages which was wrong, sure, but whatever I don't see why Thortown is more likely to check this than Thorscum as both would want to get things right for different reasons. Then we have the quantity argument which looked fine to me, Axle has shown me the way, but no-one else seems to actually understand it or the reason it is actually wrong.
In post 3464, Scripten wrote:Tiershift, why so singleminded for the Thor wagon? I mean, I was starting to like it, but Garmr's recent actions must have been enough to get you onto his wagon. Do you really find his replacing out to be -that- alignment-indicative. I'm all for waiting for his replacement to see if miracles occur, but this makes that Thor wagon look mighty wrong to me.
In post 3461, TierShift wrote:Let's just go for thor.
In post 3381, AxleGreaser wrote:@Goodmorning
[...]
on D1 you claimed it was all tone and feels andto provide details.refused
I believe on D2 all of sudden you have started being able to provide details based on D1 posts.
The D1 lynch mislynched one townie who was being wagoned against another(Anen)
and you rather conveniently were not pushing your wagon with reason so it didnt go anywhere.
Now on D2, all of sudden you have reasons?
I call BS, explain your case
explain why on D2 it has details and on D1, you didnt have any
In post 3415, AxleGreaser wrote:I've decided that, for the sake of my sanity, [....] postEither way, I can't be bothered.
In post 3468, davesaz wrote:@Slandaar: At the end of the 2nd quote, which "it" is actually wrong?
In post 3410, Izariael wrote:If your statements were talking about thetotal number of words used when listing thoughts about Pere and Anen, thenwas the time to clarify it. Not DAYS later.this