In post 1798, Titus wrote:I also said Egg could claim for me and we were opposites. I was wrong but that's a hell of a risk Day 1.
What does this even mean? How are you guys opposites?
In post 1798, Titus wrote:I also said Egg could claim for me and we were opposites. I was wrong but that's a hell of a risk Day 1.
In post 1791, Green Crayons wrote:You're welcome, FF. Without my sarcasm pushing you over the edge, you'd never had made such a solid change in vote.
In post 1792, Green Crayons wrote:Titus totally watched the NK, and got results, and no funny business, right?
In post 1804, shos wrote:VOTE: titus
Scum having a ninja and town having the power weknow ot has makes no sense for a watcher/tracker.
Also, he is spittingbullshit.
I practically made the traction the nati wagon needed; and my dealer crumb should be especially strong now that scum goon is dealer too.
In post 1563, Green Crayons wrote:You were very scattered shot in D2 and D3 of that mini, which is what I'm referring to - you were jumping back and forth between a set of players. It doesn't look a lot like your play here.
That said, I'm not super big on the power of meta, and I recognize a sample size of 2 games for a particular player's way of playing the game is not exactly stellar.
UNVOTE: BBT
VOTE: Nat
I'm actually feeling pretty adrift this game, without anything solid. That sucks.
you say that you hate me trying to take credit for yhe nati wagon.
In post 1772, shos wrote:VOTE: natirasha
We are not nolynching and this is the only seemingly viable wagon that is not on a townread of mine.
Re:inactivity - i learnes that theres a titusmeet this week, meaning many MSplayers meet up or something.
In post 1778, Formerfish wrote:Its not so much that I care about people going vla, its that I get a little annoyed when multiple people in the same game are on extended vla coming into a deadline.
And Green I'm glad that you took that away from what I was saying, [sarcasm]because that's like totally my point.[/sarcasm]
Fuck it.
Vote Nati
In post 1802, Formerfish wrote:So you thought there were two watcher/trackers that were active on opposite nights? That didn't seem a little excessive, especially considering you are putting forth an unlimited ninja role on the scum side of it?
Did you ever explain why you tracked Ika?
In post 1814, Formerfish wrote:Shos how do you figure that your crumb solidifies you as town now?
And if Titus doesn't get active in this game she is going to earn my vote more quickly than she should, cause she's scum either way.
In post 1814, Formerfish wrote:Shos how do you figure that your crumb solidifies you as town now?
And if Titus doesn't get active in this game she is going to earn my vote more quickly than she should, cause she's scum either way.
In post 1809, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Titus, can you explain your town-read on Who? I don't get it.
In post 1821, Titus wrote:
Who seems rather reluctant to rush to judgment. His posts that asked questions as he was reading allowed for a clear train of thought to be followed.
Compare that to Desperado - Mr. OMG I will vote every wagon but Shos.
Compare to Shos - I am conftown because I am dealer and there's no way scum would know VT is dealer...and then scum had dealer.
Dr. Who is a smidge PoE ( as you BBT and ika are confirmed town from my perspective).
I also looked at that epically bad Pants wagon. It formed in 6 hours. Why did Desp tey a flashwagon on Pants?
He knew Beck would go for it. So both Desp and shos vote Pants. The end of the 6hour flashwagon was town. That wagon was scumled.