Robbery! At The Casino (Game Over)


User avatar
Formerfish
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
User avatar
User avatar
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
Busboy Revolutionary
Posts: 12855
Joined: July 1, 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post Post #1750 (ISO) » Tue Nov 04, 2014 1:26 pm

Post by Formerfish »

Page top
User avatar
Majiffy
Majiffy
Go with the Flow
User avatar
User avatar
Majiffy
Go with the Flow
Go with the Flow
Posts: 23825
Joined: November 23, 2011
Location: Memphis, TN

Post Post #1751 (ISO) » Tue Nov 04, 2014 1:46 pm

Post by Majiffy »

Bitch.
Only playing in games at personal moderator and/or 50%+ playerlist request.


How To Win Every Game At Mafiascum (The Flowchart)
||
In case anyone was unsure...
Svenskt Stål (23:38) majiffy, worst mod on ms? we talk to a surviving victim of his game
User avatar
Majiffy
Majiffy
Go with the Flow
User avatar
User avatar
Majiffy
Go with the Flow
Go with the Flow
Posts: 23825
Joined: November 23, 2011
Location: Memphis, TN

Post Post #1752 (ISO) » Tue Nov 04, 2014 1:46 pm

Post by Majiffy »

THIS IS A VOTECOUNT LOL


ika (2): Doctor Who, geraintm
BlueBloodedToffee (2): ika, Natirasha
Green Crayons (1): Formerfish
Natirasha (2): Green Crayons, BlueBloodedToffee
Shos (1): Titus
Titus (1): Shos

Not Voting:
With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.

Day 3 ends on Sunday, November 9 at 2:30 PM Eastern

Accuracy never guaranteed. But
probably
accurate.
Only playing in games at personal moderator and/or 50%+ playerlist request.


How To Win Every Game At Mafiascum (The Flowchart)
||
In case anyone was unsure...
Svenskt Stål (23:38) majiffy, worst mod on ms? we talk to a surviving victim of his game
ika
ika
Survivor
ika
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11656
Joined: December 13, 2013

Post Post #1753 (ISO) » Tue Nov 04, 2014 5:29 pm

Post by ika »

In post 1746, Formerfish wrote:
In post 1730, ika wrote:scums.

me being a player who love to make so much wifom and so little sense know what i would be doing if i was scum in this situation for the nk.

the fact titus is trying to stop my myslynch is humorous and makes me want to do it all the more


I disagree that not killing Titus would be suboptimal play. I don't feel like going into more detail but I think that idea is objectively false.


i know, i was seeing who was also thinking like me.

i have my own thoughts but i will save it for post-game/deadthread on what i would do
ika
ika
Survivor
ika
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11656
Joined: December 13, 2013

Post Post #1754 (ISO) » Tue Nov 04, 2014 5:33 pm

Post by ika »

@germ:

In post 1748, Formerfish wrote:No, the play is the correct one. We force scums hand to not kill you and weaken the lynch pool. They either kill Titus which clears up any suspicion in that case, kill you to frame Titus (if they actually have a ninja), or kill someone else for the wifom of it all.


its basic mafia stratagy. they are force to play a diffrent hand there is no sense in playing "out wifom the scum" at this point

the primary point is this: you are confirmed town so in any lylo, it better to have it with one confirmed town then none.
User avatar
shos
shos
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
shos
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 17862
Joined: November 28, 2011

Post Post #1755 (ISO) » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:09 pm

Post by shos »

In post 1750, Formerfish wrote:Page top

In post 1751, Majiffy wrote:Bitch.

AHAHAHAHHAHAH


guys you're talking about scum wifom tactics.
In post 836, Lucky2u said:

Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.
ika
ika
Survivor
ika
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11656
Joined: December 13, 2013

Post Post #1756 (ISO) » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:42 pm

Post by ika »

In post 1755, shos wrote:
In post 1750, Formerfish wrote:Page top

In post 1751, Majiffy wrote:Bitch.

AHAHAHAHHAHAH


guys you're talking about scum wifom tactics.


ya so?

this is litarly the gamestate:

2. Shos - doign whatever
3. Formerfish - talking to me about scum tactics and how we would play
5. Natirasha - afk
6. geraintm - afk but town
7. Doctor Who - myslynching me
8. ika - waitng for my myslynch
9. Titus - V/LA
11. Green Crayons - somewhere
12. BlueBloodedToffee - not helping myslynch me
69. majiffy - :P
User avatar
Formerfish
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
User avatar
User avatar
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
Busboy Revolutionary
Posts: 12855
Joined: July 1, 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post Post #1757 (ISO) » Tue Nov 04, 2014 7:11 pm

Post by Formerfish »

Were also explaining how Ger could be helpful right now, and why what we are saying makes sense. You guys want to see wifom played pretty well, go look at Messiah Complex in flying aces. That is exactly what we are talking about here.
ika
ika
Survivor
ika
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11656
Joined: December 13, 2013

Post Post #1758 (ISO) » Tue Nov 04, 2014 7:12 pm

Post by ika »

link?
User avatar
Formerfish
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
User avatar
User avatar
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
Busboy Revolutionary
Posts: 12855
Joined: July 1, 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post Post #1759 (ISO) » Tue Nov 04, 2014 7:30 pm

Post by Formerfish »

ika
ika
Survivor
ika
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11656
Joined: December 13, 2013

Post Post #1760 (ISO) » Tue Nov 04, 2014 7:37 pm

Post by ika »

so is the wfiom the doc claim or something else?

i staarted to read though but my eyes started to gloss halfwaythought the second giant post
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1761 (ISO) » Wed Nov 05, 2014 1:08 am

Post by Green Crayons »

lol

I'm somewhere?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23692
Joined: April 10, 2014
Location: Liverpool, UK

Post Post #1762 (ISO) » Wed Nov 05, 2014 1:14 am

Post by BlueBloodedToffee »

I'll be glad to help lynch you if your wagon picks up a little more steam Ika.

I think I would much rather lynch Nati right now though.
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1763 (ISO) » Wed Nov 05, 2014 1:36 am

Post by Green Crayons »

@shos:


I'm all down for suspecting Titus, but you really want to lynch a potential PR today?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1764 (ISO) » Wed Nov 05, 2014 1:38 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1739, Doctor Who wrote:
In post 1734, Green Crayons wrote:I know that's when you encountered that particular exchange between DT and Egg. I also encountered it after I replaced in and started reading the thread. However, even though we (supposedly) have the same role, the part of DT's question which specifically invoked our dealer flavor didn't ring any bells to you?

Also, I specifically asked you if you got anything out of any of the three questions DT asked Egg (, , and ). That includes DT's question about counting cards or hacking machines. I understand that you have repeatedly said that the entire post didn't make sense to you, but you specifically rejected the idea that any single question -- including the one that referenced our VT flavor -- made sense to you.

It didn't ring any bells for me. Isolating a portions of the post that I was confused about didn't help with my understanding. I had a lot to read up on, and figured that it would make itself known in due time. I also didn't pick up on shos softclaim. What is the point that you are trying to make out of this?

I just find it weird that if you are actually a VT, then when Player A asked Player B a series of questions intended to ferret out the role flavor of Player B, and one of those questions specifically referenced the VT flavor, this didn't ping your radar in the slightest.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23692
Joined: April 10, 2014
Location: Liverpool, UK

Post Post #1765 (ISO) » Wed Nov 05, 2014 2:05 am

Post by BlueBloodedToffee »

GC, how would DT (Titus) be able to reference the VT PM when she didn't get one?

Or am I missing something?
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1766 (ISO) » Wed Nov 05, 2014 2:12 am

Post by Green Crayons »

I don't know if she was specifically referencing the VT flavor, but it certainly looks that way from an outside perspective. Such as, say, a VT reading through the thread for the firsttime after replacing in.

Also, DT shouldn't have known the VT flavor at that point, so that's why I'm suspicious of her and her claim. I'd like to hear from Titus why she asked that particular question about counting cards versus slot machines, as well as the weird bit about her claim I noted earlier.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
shos
shos
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
shos
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 17862
Joined: November 28, 2011

Post Post #1767 (ISO) » Wed Nov 05, 2014 2:29 am

Post by shos »

Yep.
Titus acts nonsensically. He will also probably waste his shots on me whenever. So why not.
In post 836, Lucky2u said:

Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.
User avatar
Formerfish
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
User avatar
User avatar
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
Busboy Revolutionary
Posts: 12855
Joined: July 1, 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post Post #1768 (ISO) » Wed Nov 05, 2014 2:45 am

Post by Formerfish »

She. And how does her nonsensical ness explain having information she shouldn't have?

Actually, what was that post even referencing shos?
User avatar
shos
shos
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
shos
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 17862
Joined: November 28, 2011

Post Post #1769 (ISO) » Wed Nov 05, 2014 4:01 am

Post by shos »

that was @1763.
In post 836, Lucky2u said:

Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1770 (ISO) » Wed Nov 05, 2014 2:50 pm

Post by Green Crayons »

Oh I'm going to Disney starting tomorrow, and won't be back until Sunday. Because I can, and because it will be fun, that's why.

So
V/LA from November 6 - 10
.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Formerfish
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
User avatar
User avatar
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
Busboy Revolutionary
Posts: 12855
Joined: July 1, 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post Post #1771 (ISO) » Wed Nov 05, 2014 3:07 pm

Post by Formerfish »

Awesome, we have 2 players that will be vla until after deadline. Guys why not replace the fuck out?
User avatar
shos
shos
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
shos
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 17862
Joined: November 28, 2011

Post Post #1772 (ISO) » Wed Nov 05, 2014 9:31 pm

Post by shos »

VOTE: natirasha
We are not nolynching and this is the only seemingly viable wagon that is not on a townread of mine.

Re:inactivity - i learnes that theres a titusmeet this week, meaning many MSplayers meet up or something.
In post 836, Lucky2u said:

Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23692
Joined: April 10, 2014
Location: Liverpool, UK

Post Post #1773 (ISO) » Wed Nov 05, 2014 11:48 pm

Post by BlueBloodedToffee »

Fish, join the Nati wagon.

That's today's lynch.
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1774 (ISO) » Thu Nov 06, 2014 1:12 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1771, Formerfish wrote:Awesome, we have 2 players that will be vla until after deadline. Guys why not replace the fuck out?

lol
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).

Return to “Completed Mini Theme Games”