Micro 407: Jurassic Park Mafia - Game Over

Beck · Post Post #950 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 11:32 am

I said it once, I'll say it again. Town is fucked and isn't going to win. Just put me out of my misery so I don't have to read anymore of it.

Scripten · Post Post #951 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 11:34 am

In post 949, Beck wrote:
In post 947, Scripten wrote:. I would rather hammer correctly than try to appease people.

This person is not the person who just gave intent to hammer over a non scummy post...

Do you read everything at face value?

Mathdino · Post Post #952 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 11:37 am

Scripten, why are you suddenly unwilling to vote? Did I read your pedit correctly in that you originally voted but deleted that?

Mathdino · Post Post #953 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 11:41 am

In post 946, Beck wrote:
In post 944, Mathdino wrote:Yes, it's because I want to reread the thread and you stating 'intent to hammer' makes me worried you will before I'm done. Trust me, I'll hammer him when I'm done.

So you are going to take your time to reread and hammer me no matter what?

Oh lol I didn't see this. Well, Majiffy is now town in my eyes, and I trust his scumhunting ability fairly well.
If something really glaring comes up in my reread that makes me think you're town, I'll change my mind and post that instead of a hammer.

I'm a bit paranoid about hammers before discussion is over, and since I don't think I've said quite enough yet, I'd prefer to be in charge of that.

Scripten · Post Post #954 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 11:42 am

In post 952, Mathdino wrote:Scripten, why are you suddenly unwilling to vote? Did I read your pedit correctly in that you originally voted but deleted that?

Because I got a sudden case of cold feet on Beck's wagon due to events outside of his behavior. You read my pedit incorrectly.

Beck · Post Post #955 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 11:48 am

In post 951, Scripten wrote:
In post 949, Beck wrote:
In post 947, Scripten wrote:. I would rather hammer correctly than try to appease people.

This person is not the person who just gave intent to hammer over a non scummy post...

Do you read everything at face value?

Yes

Scripten · Post Post #956 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 11:49 am

In post 955, Beck wrote:
In post 951, Scripten wrote:
In post 949, Beck wrote:
In post 947, Scripten wrote:. I would rather hammer correctly than try to appease people.

This person is not the person who just gave intent to hammer over a non scummy post...

Do you read everything at face value?

Yes

Don't.

Grib · Post Post #957 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 11:52 am

Four people. Four different people brought to L-1 on D1. God.

Mathdino · Post Post #958 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 11:54 am

Beck was already at L-1 before, he claimed VT. I put him at L-1 to see his reaction at the danger of being lynched again.

Beck · Post Post #959 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 12:01 pm

In post 958, Mathdino wrote:Beck was already at L-1 before, he claimed VT. I put him at L-1 to see his reaction at the danger of being lynched again.

My reaction isn't going to change, I was totally expecting to get lynched last time, I expect it to happen this time.

Jiffy made 1 post that shows basically nothing of value. I've seen wagons form on town and a counter wagon on another town before.

If only be put that kind of effort in making a case on anyone... You know the whole point of the game?

You call my post self preservation. Majiffy's post was the epitome of self preservation.

I'm town. Jiffy/scripten are my final scum reads.

Hammer away.

Peace out homies

Scripten · Post Post #960 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 12:18 pm

Hm.

VOTE: Majiffy

I'm ready for anyone to hammer, preferably Mathdino.

Mathdino · Post Post #961 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 12:31 pm

Wait what? What are you trying to achieve?

Why would I hammer someone I just told you I'm townreading?

Why did you state intent to hammer 3 times, back off his wagon, and suddenly vote jiffy again?

No one hammer yet.

Mathdino · Post Post #962 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 12:34 pm

@Mod: Is it possible for you to take off Finn's vote since he's getting replaced?

Beck · Post Post #963 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 12:34 pm

In post 961, Mathdino wrote:Why did you state intent to hammer 3 times, back off his wagon, and suddenly vote jiffy again?

Ooh I know :raises hand wildly:

Scripten · Post Post #964 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 12:36 pm

Replies in bold.

In post 961, Mathdino wrote:Wait what? What are you trying to achieve?
Gettin' reads.

Why would I hammer someone I just told you I'm townreading?
I don't think you will.

Why did you state intent to hammer 3 times, back off his wagon, and suddenly vote jiffy again?
Gettin' reads.

No one hammer yet.

Mathdino · Post Post #965 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 12:39 pm

Wait shit Finn's not voting Majiffy.

Can someone unvote jiffy please.

Scripten · Post Post #966 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 12:41 pm

In post 965, Mathdino wrote:Wait shit Finn's not voting Majiffy.

Can someone unvote jiffy please.

Calm down. Nobody's going to quickhammer him.

Beck · Post Post #967 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 12:47 pm

In post 965, Mathdino wrote:Wait shit Finn's not voting Majiffy.

Can someone unvote jiffy please.

unvote

Cause I'm a swell guy

Mathdino · Post Post #968 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 12:51 pm

Not from reading the thread, but I'm beginning to think we should run up Scripten again. Ever since his softclaim it's like he's been using that as an excuse to literally be the scummiest person in the game. The deadline freeze actually gives us a ton of options.

Scripten · Post Post #969 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 12:54 pm

Hahaha.

Wow, I totally called that. Beck, you should come back to the Majiffy wagon. I love how this is actually putting more pressure on Mathdino than it is Majiffy.

Beck · Post Post #970 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 12:56 pm

In post 968, Mathdino wrote:Not from reading the thread, but I'm beginning to think we should run up Scripten again. Ever since his softclaim it's like he's been using that as an excuse to literally be the scummiest person in the game. The deadline freeze actually gives us a ton of options.

Oh don't tease me...

Grib · Post Post #971 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 12:58 pm

To be fair, I kind of feel the same way about you, Scripten. Even so, it's not really something I want to touch toDay because wine and paranoia make for bad decisions.

Scripten · Post Post #972 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 1:10 pm

In post 971, Grib wrote:To be fair, I kind of feel the same way about you, Scripten. Even so, it's not really something I want to touch toDay because wine and paranoia make for bad decisions.

What, that I'm bothered by the Majiffy wagon? (HINT: I'm not.) Do you not see what just happened? Actually, I can understand missing it. Drunk mafia is a ton of fun, but it's playing on hard mode.

Guys, Majiffy lynch is best lynch. It will give us a ton of information and is probably a scum lynch.

Pine · Post Post #973 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 1:11 pm

Still don't like the Majiffy wagon. Beck wagon remains laughable

We need more input from Insanity

Mathdino · Post Post #974 (ISO) » Mon Nov 03, 2014 1:14 pm

Gee Scripten, I wonder what

possible

motivation I might have right now for wanting to stall the lynch, what with the

looming

deadline and all.

Scripten thinks a Majiffy scumflip will lead to me. Yet somehow my actions were what caused him to (finally) vote Majiffy after saying he would 3 or 4 times, and completely nix his read on Beck.