Mini 407 -- MMM: Haiku -- Game Over!!

Skruffs · Post Post #500 (ISO) » Wed Jun 13, 2007 4:16 am

four player scum team?
the mod would be most unkind.
more to add, later.

Mert · Post Post #501 (ISO) » Wed Jun 13, 2007 5:56 am

Good point there Skruffsman
Four would be very unkind
Still, should be careful

Skruffs · Post Post #502 (ISO) » Wed Jun 13, 2007 8:29 am

what's not understood
buddies pushing for pook lynch
then killed the decoy???

Toaster Strudel · Post Post #503 (ISO) » Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:49 am

LyingBrian, not scum
Nightfall, not scum - did not switch
vote, Pooky to me.

Toaster Strudel · Post Post #504 (ISO) » Thu Jun 14, 2007 10:50 am

Cogito not scum,
Same reason. Look for Vit-R,
Skruffs, Mert; scum is there.

Toaster Strudel · Post Post #505 (ISO) » Thu Jun 14, 2007 12:14 pm

VitaminR wrote:A response! Still do
prefer a Toaster Strudel
lynch today. Switch back.

Unvote: PookyTheMagicalBear,
Vote: Toaster Strudel

vote: Vitamin R

Skruffs · Post Post #506 (ISO) » Thu Jun 14, 2007 12:32 pm

I beg to differ
Those who didn't want no lynch;
are not auto-scum

Toaster Strudel · Post Post #507 (ISO) » Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:17 pm

Yes but scum would have
switched their vote around to kill
any old townie.

Toaster Strudel · Post Post #508 (ISO) » Thu Jun 14, 2007 1:18 pm

And that, Skruffs my friend,
is exactly what your buddy
Vitamin R did.

Skruffs · Post Post #509 (ISO) » Thu Jun 14, 2007 2:24 pm

Vit's random votinh
was over eager and brash
but votes themselves? No.

Toaster Strudel · Post Post #510 (ISO) » Fri Jun 15, 2007 4:16 am

I beg to differ.
The most recent switch sure was
suspicious as hell.

Toaster Strudel · Post Post #511 (ISO) » Fri Jun 15, 2007 4:18 am

How I like my vote!
It is a most darling vote...
sweet, pure, and righteous.

Skruffs · Post Post #512 (ISO) » Fri Jun 15, 2007 7:57 am

you can not base "scum"
on who switched votes off of town
on or near deadline.

Skruffs · Post Post #513 (ISO) » Fri Jun 15, 2007 8:01 am

while vit-r acts bad,
you seem to be barning him
think

before

you post.

Mert · Post Post #514 (ISO) » Fri Jun 15, 2007 8:19 am

Still happy with this:
I will

Vote: Toaster Strudel

Vit-R reasons bad

Toaster Strudel · Post Post #515 (ISO) » Fri Jun 15, 2007 9:02 am

I would be happy
To rise a cute Mert wagon
Vit-R>Mert>Skruffs, die!

Mert · Post Post #516 (ISO) » Fri Jun 15, 2007 9:44 am

Whoopsie, I forgot
Accusing Toast means you're scum
I lost the memo

VitaminR · Post Post #517 (ISO) » Fri Jun 15, 2007 6:46 pm

Lynches are good for
town. Yes, I switched to get one.
I said so then too.

Nightfall · Post Post #518 (ISO) » Sun Jun 17, 2007 3:19 pm

sorry guys week from
hell, so much school and bad stuff
try my best to help

Skruffs · Post Post #519 (ISO) » Mon Jun 18, 2007 1:29 am

mert that makes no sense
i never accused toaster,
her accusers did.

Mert · Post Post #520 (ISO) » Mon Jun 18, 2007 8:23 am

Skruffs wrote:mert that makes no sense
i never accused toaster,
her accusers did.

That was sarcasm
Directed at Toast and her
Oh God, You Suck vote.

Mert · Post Post #521 (ISO) » Mon Jun 18, 2007 8:23 am

'Dit by way of post
I meant Oh My God You Suck
Wagonning attempt

Skruffs · Post Post #522 (ISO) » Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:39 am

Oh, I can see now.
I did not accuse her though
I said no lynch bad.

Nightfall · Post Post #523 (ISO) » Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:59 am

Wait a minute here
C E S are you still here?
under radar bad

Mert · Post Post #524 (ISO) » Wed Jun 20, 2007 7:06 am

Skruffs wrote:Oh, I can see now.
I did not accuse her though
I said no lynch bad.

True, but then she did
Cite Vit-R and Mert before
Skruffs on her list thing