In post 796, Grib wrote:BBT, summarize why Mathdino's vote was scummy. Just a couple points. Or at least specific posts.
738, 740, 743, 749 and 752
In post 798, Beck wrote:In post 795, Majiffy wrote:Keep on strengthening that scumread, Beck.
Ooh like I care, if you are town you are playing like shitbwith equally shitty reads. You better hope nobody puts you at l-1
In post 799, Grib wrote:Majiffy is more interested in snarking at people than playing the game.
Lynch it.
In post 799, Grib wrote:Majiffy is more interested in snarking at people than playing the game.
Lynch it.
In post 801, Majiffy wrote:What are you going to do, quickhammer a townie on D1? Retard.
In post 802, Beck wrote:In post 799, Grib wrote:Majiffy is more interested in snarking at people than playing the game.
Lynch it.
Get him to l-1 and I'll happily do it. Town majiffy doesn't play this bad
In post 803, Beck wrote:In post 801, Majiffy wrote:What are you going to do, quickhammer a townie on D1? Retard.
I'm going to quick hammer scum day 1
mod, this insult is unacceptable.
In post 806, Majiffy wrote:In post 803, Beck wrote:In post 801, Majiffy wrote:What are you going to do, quickhammer a townie on D1? Retard.
I'm going to quick hammer scum day 1
mod, this insult is unacceptable.
"Someone insulted me in a mafia game!" - OP
In post 804, Majiffy wrote:In post 802, Beck wrote:In post 799, Grib wrote:Majiffy is more interested in snarking at people than playing the game.
Lynch it.
Get him to l-1 and I'll happily do it. Town majiffy doesn't play this bad
Where, exactly, is my play bad?
Provide a case. Because no one has yet.
And then after that, elaborate on your bountiful Majiffy meta to make a statement like that.
In post 810, Beck wrote:
Nothing pro town in.your ISO. I've also played.with at least 5 games and have lynched you as scum. This matches that game.
In post 812, Beck wrote:No this majiffy wagon isn't shitty. Vote him for town cred
I just finished up an off-site game that was eating up all my free time. My presence site-wide should return to normal levels.
I was busy corralling town to lynch itself in a mountainous game with 24 hour days and no nightkills or nightphases after Day 4.
I dominated, decimated, and feel like a king. So I don't want to hear your shit.
Produce something to analyze... Like maybe working on building a wagon on my top scumread
{Beck, Insanity, FinnLaw}
Scum, in order of strength
{Grib, Scripten, BBT, Pine}
Town, no order.
No read on the Mathdino yet. Gut tells me to read him as town but ehhhhhhhhhh
In post 815, Beck wrote:I just finished up an off-site game that was eating up all my free time. My presence site-wide should return to normal levels.
Making up reasons to lurk
In post 815, Beck wrote:
I was busy corralling town to lynch itself in a mountainous game with 24 hour days and no nightkills or nightphases after Day 4.
I dominated, decimated, and feel like a king. So I don't want to hear your shit.
Clogging the thread with non game related content
In post 815, Beck wrote:
Produce something to analyze... Like maybe working on building a wagon on my top scumread
Telling people to do things that you aren't doing yourself
In post 815, Beck wrote:
{Beck, Insanity, FinnLaw}
Scum, in order of strength
{Grib, Scripten, BBT, Pine}
Town, no order.
No read on the Mathdino yet. Gut tells me to read him as town but ehhhhhhhhhh
Giving reads without any reason for them, can't even explain.your scum reads.
In post 769, Majiffy wrote:In post 766, Pine wrote:Very little. It's why I'd rather you actually produce something to analyze instead of sit there like a lump taking up space. A lump that responds with invective instead of taking the advice that is most likely to get Town back on track
Produce something to analyze... Like maybe working on building a wagon on my top scumread, the only other wagon that has more than one vote on it, and should be tied with the leading wagon by the time BBT gets online?
In post 819, Majiffy wrote:I also note that with exception to my reads list, every single quote you just dragged up occurredlong afteryou voted me.
Which means you're retroactively trying your hardest to fit a case to your vote where one doesn't exist.
With misrepresentations and out-right untruths as highlighted above.
In post 822, Beck wrote:In post 819, Majiffy wrote:I also note that with exception to my reads list, every single quote you just dragged up occurredlong afteryou voted me.
Which means you're retroactively trying your hardest to fit a case to your vote where one doesn't exist.
With misrepresentations and out-right untruths as highlighted above.
Where did I vote you exactly?