Robbery! At The Casino (Game Over)


User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23692
Joined: April 10, 2014
Location: Liverpool, UK

Post Post #1550 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 7:48 am

Post by BlueBloodedToffee »

Alright so, couple of questions;

Why is nobody voting Ika for his blatant soft-claim that went wrong?

Why is nobody voting Nati? Like seriously, how is Nati town?
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
User avatar
Doctor Who
Doctor Who
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Doctor Who
Goon
Goon
Posts: 651
Joined: March 14, 2010

Post Post #1551 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 8:17 am

Post by Doctor Who »

Suffering through a lot of Beck nonsense at the moment, wishing PC would just let it go.
Hunt scum or be hunted.
User avatar
Formerfish
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
User avatar
User avatar
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
Busboy Revolutionary
Posts: 12855
Joined: July 1, 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post Post #1552 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 8:42 am

Post by Formerfish »

Sorry I get insolent when people wrongly accuse me for stupid reasons.
User avatar
Formerfish
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
User avatar
User avatar
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
Busboy Revolutionary
Posts: 12855
Joined: July 1, 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post Post #1553 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 8:45 am

Post by Formerfish »

BBT, Green is the right vote for today, it'll gave us way more info than an Ika flip would.
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23692
Joined: April 10, 2014
Location: Liverpool, UK

Post Post #1554 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 8:46 am

Post by BlueBloodedToffee »

Green is town though.

I would much rather an Ika or Nati wagon.
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23692
Joined: April 10, 2014
Location: Liverpool, UK

Post Post #1555 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 8:47 am

Post by BlueBloodedToffee »

Like, I've been patiently waiting for town to catch up and realize that Nati is scum since D1. It's really starting to annoy me.

I don't like people ignoring Ika's blatant slip and his lack of explanation for that slip either.
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
User avatar
Doctor Who
Doctor Who
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Doctor Who
Goon
Goon
Posts: 651
Joined: March 14, 2010

Post Post #1556 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:02 am

Post by Doctor Who »

In post 899, Majiffy wrote:
ika replaces Beck effective immediately


And then two minutes later this.

In post 900, ika wrote:VOTE: desp

desp/sho are most likely a team. now to find 3rd.

i have been vaugly following game so there that


How did you get up to speed so quickly?
Hunt scum or be hunted.
User avatar
Doctor Who
Doctor Who
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Doctor Who
Goon
Goon
Posts: 651
Joined: March 14, 2010

Post Post #1557 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:09 am

Post by Doctor Who »

In post 1555, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Like, I've been patiently waiting for town to catch up and realize that Nati is scum since D1. It's really starting to annoy me.

I don't like people ignoring Ika's blatant slip and his lack of explanation for that slip either.


You have been on Nati for a while, but haven't been pushing for the noose. You've been more like "let's save Nati for later".

As for ika, ika just replaced Beck in my read through.

You are at L-1, I'm surprised you are not pushing harder.
Hunt scum or be hunted.
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23692
Joined: April 10, 2014
Location: Liverpool, UK

Post Post #1558 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:11 am

Post by BlueBloodedToffee »

I pushed the Nati slot fairly hard D1 and it pretty much fell on deaf ears. I clearly posted to say I would wait for town to catch up and realize that Nati was scum.

If you ISO me, you will see why I'm wanting an Ika lynch.

I can't say anything more than I already have.
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
User avatar
Doctor Who
Doctor Who
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Doctor Who
Goon
Goon
Posts: 651
Joined: March 14, 2010

Post Post #1559 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:18 am

Post by Doctor Who »

In post 940, ika wrote:you understand i have been losely following the game so i know full well why you are pushing those 2?

i was expecting more but whatever


Answered my own question again.
Hunt scum or be hunted.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1560 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:25 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Yo I'm down for a Nati lynch, but when my vote was on her earlier today I'm pretty sure I was the only one?

@BBT:
your play looks like cautious scum because you have been very measured and focused in your scumreads. That looks quite different from your play in DrPepper's mini.

@Doctor Who:
it might benefit you to see who has flipped what as you're doing your reread. You've posted some comments (suggesting you're suspicious) to a confirmed town mason.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23692
Joined: April 10, 2014
Location: Liverpool, UK

Post Post #1561 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:29 am

Post by BlueBloodedToffee »

In post 1560, Green Crayons wrote:Yo I'm down for a Nati lynch, but when my vote was on her earlier today I'm pretty sure I was the only one?

@BBT:
your play looks like cautious scum because you have been very measured and focused in your scumreads. That looks quite different from your play in DrPepper's mini.

I can get behind a Nati lynch.

You know full well what happened in that game. Meta is bad for reading me, particularly if you're only going to use one game. I was all over the place in that game and I had legitimate reasons for acting the way I did.
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1562 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:31 am

Post by Green Crayons »

@BBT:


In post 1082, ika wrote:
In post 1080, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Can anyone tell me why Desp is scum?

Getting tired of Ika dodging my question as well.


i already told you that most of my reads are gut calls and bouncing off people who i think are town.

your not going to get more then that untill i take action tonight

In post 1120, ika wrote:titus im just ingoring you b.c i know your scum now and if your town yous just stupid i have linked 2 games (ONE OF WHICH WE JUST RECENTLY FINISHED) where you did the same jack shit as scum

pedit: dealer, VT

Could you tease out more (beyond "reactions? pffft!" which I saw you post) your opinion on ika's explanation that the disparity between the bolded was that he was simply looking for reactions in Post 1082 when he talked about a night action?

Is this "slip" the only basis for you doing a 180 on the slot (previously filled by Beck)?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1563 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:37 am

Post by Green Crayons »

You were very scattered shot in D2 and D3 of that mini, which is what I'm referring to - you were jumping back and forth between a set of players. It doesn't look a lot like your play here.

That said, I'm not super big on the power of meta, and I recognize a sample size of 2 games for a particular player's way of playing the game is not exactly stellar.

UNVOTE: BBT
VOTE: Nat

I'm actually feeling pretty adrift this game, without anything solid. That sucks.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23692
Joined: April 10, 2014
Location: Liverpool, UK

Post Post #1564 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:43 am

Post by BlueBloodedToffee »

Reactions is an easy get-out clause. Not to mention I specifically asked him for the reasoning behind those posts over and over and he repeatedly flat out refused to answer me. This makes me think he needed time to get together some sort of explanation for his slip given how he later tried to explain it. I'm not buying a reaction test at all.

His slip is not the only reason no. I haven't liked Ika's reads. It's all in my ISO.

I didn't understand how he was scum-reading both Desp and PC, he refused to explain this when I asked him about it. He posted reads saying explanations would come, they didn't come. He just refuses to explain anything and it's very easy for him to hide behind if he is scum.

His reads are inconsistent. He ended D2 wanting to pursue Flames or Titus (?),can't remember who the second person was. He starts D3 and immediately votes for Nati, later claiming he was basically trolling me.
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23692
Joined: April 10, 2014
Location: Liverpool, UK

Post Post #1565 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 9:44 am

Post by BlueBloodedToffee »

VOTE: Nati
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
User avatar
Doctor Who
Doctor Who
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Doctor Who
Goon
Goon
Posts: 651
Joined: March 14, 2010

Post Post #1566 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 10:13 am

Post by Doctor Who »

In post 1560, Green Crayons wrote:
@Doctor Who:
it might benefit you to see who has flipped what as you're doing your reread. You've posted some comments (suggesting you're suspicious) to a confirmed town mason.


Thanks for the advice, it is working.

I'm reading now about VT vs. Vanilla Townie. I don't think there is anything to be gleaned from how someone claimed VT.
Hunt scum or be hunted.
User avatar
Doctor Who
Doctor Who
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Doctor Who
Goon
Goon
Posts: 651
Joined: March 14, 2010

Post Post #1567 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 10:22 am

Post by Doctor Who »

In post 1271, Formerfish wrote:Ace, I implore you to actually read the reasoning behind why I think that people could be scum based off them claiming vanilla. See it sounds like you still think that the scum read comes solely off the vt claim. Is that accurate? If it is, then you are blind and have missed the entire point of this huge battle between Desp, Ika and myself.

The scum read comes from them claiming vt and not vanilla townie. The fact that you cannot grasp this simple concept baffles me and makes me want to see you dead for, at the very least, nothing more than an apparent inability to understand simple concepts.


What is the casino flavor for our role?
Hunt scum or be hunted.
User avatar
Formerfish
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
User avatar
User avatar
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
Busboy Revolutionary
Posts: 12855
Joined: July 1, 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post Post #1568 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 10:26 am

Post by Formerfish »

Not sure what you are actually asking right here.
User avatar
Doctor Who
Doctor Who
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Doctor Who
Goon
Goon
Posts: 651
Joined: March 14, 2010

Post Post #1569 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 10:31 am

Post by Doctor Who »

I see the confusuion: my post was missing the y in "your", so it said "our".

There are dealers, game operation managers, and a dual-rate floor manager. What are you?
Hunt scum or be hunted.
User avatar
Doctor Who
Doctor Who
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Doctor Who
Goon
Goon
Posts: 651
Joined: March 14, 2010

Post Post #1570 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 10:41 am

Post by Doctor Who »

I messed up.

I thought the person who was making a bid deal out of VT was also the person who claimed watcher.

My bad.

Titus - There are dealers, game operation managers, and a dual-rate floor manager. What are you?
Hunt scum or be hunted.
ika
ika
Survivor
ika
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11656
Joined: December 13, 2013

Post Post #1571 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 10:43 am

Post by ika »

can we get back to mass roelcall?
User avatar
Formerfish
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
User avatar
User avatar
Formerfish
Busboy Revolutionary
Busboy Revolutionary
Posts: 12855
Joined: July 1, 2013
Location: Pittsburgh, PA

Post Post #1572 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 10:47 am

Post by Formerfish »

Who, how do you know about other flavor possibilities? Did I miss something?
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1573 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 10:48 am

Post by Green Crayons »

How useful to town is a mass claim with 9 players still alive?

I don't favor it, and I haven't seen anyone argue why it's a good idea.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
ika
ika
Survivor
ika
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11656
Joined: December 13, 2013

Post Post #1574 (ISO) » Fri Oct 31, 2014 10:52 am

Post by ika »

@fish

In post 0, Majiffy wrote:Dr Pants, Dealer VT Lynched D1
Egg, Gaming Operations Manager, JOAT (Active Bulletproof, Roleblock, Doctor, Rolecop) Killed N1
theaceofspades, Dealer, VT Lynched D2
Aronis, Dual-Rate Floor Manager, Mason Killed N2


@green, b/c this game is stageniting and getting nowhere and we are not lyncht eh obviousscum BBT and our other masons wants it?

Return to “Completed Mini Theme Games”