Robbery! At The Casino (Game Over)

[Titus]

Let me tell you guys a little tale. This is a story about a fake, a fraud, a charlatan, a trickster and his buddy, the patsy, the framejob, the fall guy. See here is how I could see things going down between Titus (DoubleTrouble) and Green Crayons (Desperado). After night 1 Titus comes in thread and makes an accusation towards Green Crayons saying that they are indirectly indicting them for the night kill based off the fact that they watched Egg that night. Titus misinterprets something that I said, taking it to mean that I was questioning if they actually saw Green make the kill, meaning that I knew that scum had a ninja. Titus realized her mistake and pulled back off of me, but stayed with Green.

My theory here is that Titus faked being a watcher, and added the odd night only into it to buy another day of life before we started in on wifoming why they were still alive. Titus picked a role that would give information and would easily explain why he was seen visiting Egg if there was any other role that could have detected that. I think that Titus implicated Green because they are both scum and this was a way to spread the mist around should either of them die. If Titus died and flipped scum then Green would be cleared based off the accusation. If Green was killed and flipped scum then Titus would be clear based off the fact that he called out scum and was correct. It is a win win scenario here for them.

Since we are willing to give Titus the benefit of the doubt, and he will most likely die tonight, I think that todays lynch should be Green. I am sticking with the idea that Desp would not have interacted with me in the way that he did if he were town. I am asking you guys to trust my judgement on this one.

Vote Green

You were doing so good until you went conspiracy mode. I was convinced Desp was scum and faked a guilty on him since I should have had one.

[Formerfish]

Titus, don't take this the wrong way, but you are acting awfully rational so far this game. Where are the accusation of alignment based off the moon being in Mars retrograde?

[Green Crayons]

You were doing so good until you went conspiracy mode. I was convinced Desp was scum and faked a guilty on him since I should have had one.

Uh, this isn't what you did?

You said you watched the N1 NK, pointedly asked Desp a question, and he was like "I don't know what you're talking about."

[Green Crayons]

I don't like his posting this game. I stand by what I said in Post 1426. He's trying too hard to look rational and spell out his positions, while using some pretty shaky logic to push his votes (e.g., looking at the wagon on a D1 town lynch without any flips, his basis for voting Ika in Post 1239 and Post 1242).

I'm trying too hard to look rational...what sort of BS is that?

Good,

finally

DrPepper's mini ended. Basically, my only experience with town BBT is when I was a mason with him in Mini 1609. In that game, you were all over the place with your suspicions, accusations, and votes. Contrast with in this game, in which you appear to be taking a very measured tone.

It looks like you have drawn scum in this game, and are playing cautiously.

Would I also be scummy if I were to keep my reads close to my chest and not explain things?

Also, I don't like his buddying with my slot when it was occupied by Desp. He found Desp to be incredibly town, and the votes on Desp to be incredibly scum, without justification.

Oh wait... apparently yeah, I would.

So, I'm scummy for trying to be too open and rational and then I'm scummy for not explaining reads/reasoning.

That's contradictory and is awful reasoning for jumping on my wagon.

It's not contradictory at all. In general, you have been playing cautiously - as denoted by your insistance on taking a measured tone with trying to really spell out your justifications for suspecting/voting people.

In contrast, you have decided to buddy my slot. In this specific instance of potentially alignment-indicative play, you have failed to actually provide reasoning for why you have decided to buddy my slot. That look suspicious.

[Green Crayons]

You were doing so good until you went conspiracy mode. I was convinced Desp was scum and faked a guilty on him since I should have had one.

Uh, this isn't what you did?

You said you watched the N1 NK, pointedly asked Desp a question, and he was like "I don't know what you're talking about."

Revisited this line of posts between you and Desp. I see you did in fact outright state that you watched the N1 NK and that you were strongly implying that Desp is guilty (Post 577 and Post 583). But then Desp does say he doesn't know what you're talking about and that he's a VT (Post 584 and Post 585).

I'm confused about why you think your guilty fakeclaim actually suggests that Desp is actually scum. Taking a quick skim of your posts, it looks like this is just confirmation bias from you D1 suspicions of Desp. Yes/No?

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Good,

finally

DrPepper's mini ended. Basically, my only experience with town BBT is when I was a mason with him in Mini 1609. In that game, you were all over the place with your suspicions, accusations, and votes. Contrast with in this game, in which you appear to be taking a very measured tone.

It looks like you have drawn scum in this game, and are playing cautiously.

Would I also be scummy if I were to keep my reads close to my chest and not explain things?

Also, I don't like his buddying with my slot when it was occupied by Desp. He found Desp to be incredibly town, and the votes on Desp to be incredibly scum, without justification.

Oh wait... apparently yeah, I would.

So, I'm scummy for trying to be too open and rational and then I'm scummy for not explaining reads/reasoning.

That's contradictory and is awful reasoning for jumping on my wagon.

It's not contradictory at all. In general, you have been playing cautiously - as denoted by your insistance on taking a measured tone with trying to really spell out your justifications for suspecting/voting people.

In contrast, you have decided to buddy my slot. In this specific instance of potentially alignment-indicative play, you have failed to actually provide reasoning for why you have decided to buddy my slot. That look suspicious.

Please don't use meta to try and read me.

Your whole case rests on meta so I guess I have nothing to say.

[Green Crayons]

lol

Sorry that you're playing like cautious scum, directly opposite from how you played as mason before your reveal and how you played as confirmed town after I was killed.

Titus can chime in if she agrees or disagrees, as she was involved in that game as well.

[ika]

BBT i have noticed posts elsewhere but not here....

Why are you flat out lying?

so you posting in this game a lot more vs here is my lying?

[BlueBloodedToffee]

I was posting here.

Priorities and all that.

[BlueBloodedToffee]

I don't see how I'm being cautious GC

[ika]

you posted "oh im busy" and "internet is bad" type stuff so ya i was not lying but thanks for the free misrep

im on break so i will be here for a breif moment

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Are you saying I was lying?

[ika]

i am saying you are misrepping me about lying

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Right.

You were lying. You said I was not posting here but was posting elsewhere.

When I posted elsewhere, I tried my best to post here as well. Not to mention that there wasn't a whole lot going on in this game.

[ika]

shall i compare the posts you have from the timeframes and show you the diffrence?

[ika]

GC already did the work for me so i find it funny coming from you

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Are you saying I'm scum for prioritizing a game that I was in MyLo in?

[ika]

Are you saying I'm scum for prioritizing a game that I was in MyLo in?

if thats your interpritation. you can take it as that or shall i pull up the very post i said

[BlueBloodedToffee]

Put up what you actually said.

[ika]

nay you already quoted it for me, its ovious you like ot be very chrrypicky as scum so im just going back into ignore mode with you

[BlueBloodedToffee]

I shouldn't be posting now, I'm not in the best of moods.

I'm going to come back to this later when I've calmed down.

[Doctor Who]

I watched Egg N1. Got no one visited him. I am odd night watcher so yeah...

Did you ask the mod if you would have gotten "no one visited him" if you were roleblocked?

[ika]

You were doing so good until you went conspiracy mode. I was convinced Desp was scum and faked a guilty on him since I should have had one.

titus, do you mind explaing this. are you saying you did a "fake cop guilty" shananigans? and that you are now saying you had to convince yourself he was scum?

[Doctor Who]

Late to the party.
I wouldn't havevoted for Dr pants. I didn't see anything scummy in their posts and the people they disliked, I also disliked.

Backed up a bit to start my reread, this happened right after DrPants was hammered D1 really close to the deadline. Would you have voted so there would have been a lynch, or would you have not voted so that there could have been no lynch?

[Doctor Who]

I dislike both of the votes so far. Dislike the people making them.
That wagon yesterday was fishy as anything.

Isn't hindsight wonderful?

How about you stop making vague comments and actually provide some content? Sound good?

Why was it fishy? What didn't you like? Who on the wagon looks like scum to you?

Are you town-reading PB and Aronis?

Pretty sure I said yesterday it was a bad wagon and I would never have been on it.
Wondering what desperado is going to say about aronis. Because he really needs to explain himself

Just answered my own question - you would have no lynched.