Robbery! At The Casino (Game Over)


ika
ika
Survivor
ika
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11656
Joined: December 13, 2013

Post Post #1425 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:42 am

Post by ika »

In post 1423, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Reactions...what a cop out.

Why didn't you say that when I asked you?


b/c of post like these. all you do is attack me and then follow with a question.

i have no intention of workign with people who like to be like that.

pedit: amish tell for him?
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1426 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:47 am

Post by Green Crayons »

Something about BBT's play didn't sit right with me from my read through. It's like he's trying too hard to be open about his reads. That's the best way I can put it.

For example, his shift on the beck/ika slot doesn't look genuine. BBT had a strong town read on beck the entire game. ika makes a few flippant posts D2, and BBT votes ika right out of the gate in D3. And from then on he's been just dumping all over ika to further support his ika vote.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
ika
ika
Survivor
ika
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11656
Joined: December 13, 2013

Post Post #1427 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:52 am

Post by ika »

In post 1426, Green Crayons wrote:Something about BBT's play didn't sit right with me from my read through. It's like he's trying too hard to be open about his reads. That's the best way I can put it.

For example, his shift on the beck/ika slot doesn't look genuine. BBT had a strong town read on beck the entire game. ika makes a few flippant posts D2, and BBT votes ika right out of the gate in D3. And from then on he's been just dumping all over ika to further support his ika vote.


its also why im invoking a 1v1 with him
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23692
Joined: April 10, 2014
Location: Liverpool, UK

Post Post #1428 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:53 am

Post by BlueBloodedToffee »

GC, are you going to elaborate further or is that it?

I feel I have made my position on the Ika slot more than clear.
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
User avatar
Doctor Who
Doctor Who
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Doctor Who
Goon
Goon
Posts: 651
Joined: March 14, 2010

Post Post #1429 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:54 am

Post by Doctor Who »

In post 210, Double Trouble wrote:So you're saying if you chased the chicken it would be odd? You have veen pretty even keeled about this discussion.

VOTE: unvote[/unvote]

~Trouble


I have no idea how this exchange resulted in an unvote. maybe it'll clear up as I continue to read?
Hunt scum or be hunted.
ika
ika
Survivor
ika
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11656
Joined: December 13, 2013

Post Post #1430 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:56 am

Post by ika »

In post 1428, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:GC, are you going to elaborate further or is that it?

I feel I have made my position on the Ika slot more than clear.


doesnt change the fact that you wont go though witha 1v1 on me and that you are problaly scum

its ok, i know it sucks when a player like me and a replacemnt can call you out
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1431 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:56 am

Post by Green Crayons »

@Doctor Who:
do any of the three sentences DT posted in make sense to you?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1432 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:56 am

Post by Green Crayons »

(You don't have to tell me which one.)
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
BlueBloodedToffee
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 23692
Joined: April 10, 2014
Location: Liverpool, UK

Post Post #1433 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:57 am

Post by BlueBloodedToffee »

In post 1427, ika wrote:
its also why im invoking a 1v1 with him

Is it? Have you stated this before or is that a convenient reason to justify this 1v1 you're trying to pull?

I think it's the latter. Feel free to prove me wrong though.
Meta this. Meta that. Meta Everything. Meta is not a good scum-hunting tool. PEOPLE CAN MANIPULATE THEIR META. Stop it. Stop. It. Now.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1434 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 7:58 am

Post by Green Crayons »

@BBT:
yup, that's it. At least for now. I'm not really making a push for your vote atm, just throwing out something that stuck with me from my read through.

Also, I think ika's 1v1 isn't a good idea. Are 1v1's a thing that has become A Thing?
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Doctor Who
Doctor Who
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Doctor Who
Goon
Goon
Posts: 651
Joined: March 14, 2010

Post Post #1435 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 8:07 am

Post by Doctor Who »

In post 1431, Green Crayons wrote:
@Doctor Who:
do any of the three sentences DT posted in make sense to you?


... but there are more than three sentences in that post?!?

Were they claiming something?
Hunt scum or be hunted.
User avatar
Doctor Who
Doctor Who
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Doctor Who
Goon
Goon
Posts: 651
Joined: March 14, 2010

Post Post #1436 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 8:13 am

Post by Doctor Who »

In post 287, Perfect Chaos wrote:Not lynching:
Shos, Grey, Egg and Dr. Pants

Would be ok with lynching:
Ace, Beck, BBT

Unsure of:
Pro, Gerain, DT, Desp

Please someone kill:
Aronis

Vote Ace


I'm surprised that someone could have really been this sure at this point in the game. The point on Aronis looks like someone asking for a daykill.

At this point it seems clear that DT / egg would not get lynched as they are connected somehow, so wouldn't that mean they should have been on the same list?
Hunt scum or be hunted.
User avatar
Doctor Who
Doctor Who
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Doctor Who
Goon
Goon
Posts: 651
Joined: March 14, 2010

Post Post #1437 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 8:17 am

Post by Doctor Who »

In post 301, Beck wrote:prolapsed is still my top read but I would be ok with shos, his play seems off to me

In post 302, shos wrote:wanna mislynch me again? why this time?


The
mis
lynch struck me as odd - as though shos knows that Beck is town.
Hunt scum or be hunted.
User avatar
Green Crayons
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Green Crayons
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 7612
Joined: September 21, 2002
Location: Richmond, VA

Post Post #1438 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 8:19 am

Post by Green Crayons »

In post 1435, Doctor Who wrote:
In post 1431, Green Crayons wrote:
@Doctor Who:
do any of the three sentences DT posted in make sense to you?
... but there are more than three sentences in that post?!?

Were they claiming something?

I was talking about DT's three questions.
"This Court has never held that the Constitution forbids the execution of a convicted defendant who has had a full and fair trial but is later able to convince a habeas court that he is 'actually' innocent." In re Davis, 557 U.S. 952, 955 (2009) (Scalia, J., dissenting).
User avatar
Doctor Who
Doctor Who
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Doctor Who
Goon
Goon
Posts: 651
Joined: March 14, 2010

Post Post #1439 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 8:35 am

Post by Doctor Who »

In post 478, Dr Pants wrote:I personally think we should no lynch today, and this will be one of the few times I actually suggest this. Here's why:
a) Given how unfocused town currently is, no-lynching and possibly adding extra days to the game benefits town
b) Unless town magically shows up in the final minutes, scum has control of who gets lynched
c) The top suggested compromise is on Aronis, and is being led by one of my scum reads, so screw that

If anyone wants to try to convince me otherwise they are welcome to, I'll check in on the game before the end of the day



From one doctor to another the reasons you are giving really have nothing to do with this game.
a) how focused are any games day 1? (not very)
b) day 1 starts at a really high ratio of town-to-scum, meaning it is less likley to be scum controlled.
c) everyone should have scumreads, but folks need lynchin'. There is a 100% chance of not lynching scum when you no lynch.

By this reasoning you would never lynch on day 1.
Hunt scum or be hunted.
User avatar
Doctor Who
Doctor Who
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Doctor Who
Goon
Goon
Posts: 651
Joined: March 14, 2010

Post Post #1440 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 8:37 am

Post by Doctor Who »

In post 1438, Green Crayons wrote:
In post 1435, Doctor Who wrote:
In post 1431, Green Crayons wrote:
@Doctor Who:
do any of the three sentences DT posted in make sense to you?
... but there are more than three sentences in that post?!?

Were they claiming something?

I was talking about DT's three questions.


The entire exchange (questions included) were nonsensical, hence my initial post.
Hunt scum or be hunted.
User avatar
Doctor Who
Doctor Who
Goon
User avatar
User avatar
Doctor Who
Goon
Goon
Posts: 651
Joined: March 14, 2010

Post Post #1441 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 8:44 am

Post by Doctor Who »

... and I'm up to the end of Day 1, circa post 500 page 21.
Hunt scum or be hunted.
User avatar
Natirasha
Natirasha
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Natirasha
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9041
Joined: February 18, 2008
Location: preening her feathers

Post Post #1442 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 9:51 am

Post by Natirasha »

Ah, fun fun fun.
Natirasha is just a vestige, it's Contessa now.
User avatar
Natirasha
Natirasha
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Natirasha
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9041
Joined: February 18, 2008
Location: preening her feathers

Post Post #1443 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 9:52 am

Post by Natirasha »

I could understand my play being construed as bored scum, although only one of those words is true.

(spoiler alert--I didn't even want to replace into this game!)
Natirasha is just a vestige, it's Contessa now.
ika
ika
Survivor
ika
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11656
Joined: December 13, 2013

Post Post #1444 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 9:53 am

Post by ika »

nati do me a favor and vote me?

its obvious that its BBT/shos but i need to be myslynched first
User avatar
shos
shos
Survivor
User avatar
User avatar
shos
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 17862
Joined: November 28, 2011

Post Post #1445 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 9:53 am

Post by shos »

Let's lynch Dr. Who before he reads up :P
or just speedlynch ika quick
In post 836, Lucky2u said:

Rule # 5h05: players should not attempt to use or manipulate the mod for any purpose.
User avatar
Natirasha
Natirasha
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Natirasha
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9041
Joined: February 18, 2008
Location: preening her feathers

Post Post #1446 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 9:54 am

Post by Natirasha »

Okay.

VOTE: BBT
Natirasha is just a vestige, it's Contessa now.
User avatar
Natirasha
Natirasha
Jack of All Trades
User avatar
User avatar
Natirasha
Jack of All Trades
Jack of All Trades
Posts: 9041
Joined: February 18, 2008
Location: preening her feathers

Post Post #1447 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 9:54 am

Post by Natirasha »

I haven't liked this slot since I joined the game, if you remember.
Natirasha is just a vestige, it's Contessa now.
ika
ika
Survivor
ika
Survivor
Survivor
Posts: 11656
Joined: December 13, 2013

Post Post #1448 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 9:58 am

Post by ika »

In post 1445, shos wrote:Let's lynch Dr. Who before he reads up :P
or just speedlynch ika quick


so you agnolwage you are scum? good to know

thats 2 out of 3
User avatar
Majiffy
Majiffy
Go with the Flow
User avatar
User avatar
Majiffy
Go with the Flow
Go with the Flow
Posts: 23825
Joined: November 23, 2011
Location: Memphis, TN

Post Post #1449 (ISO) » Mon Oct 27, 2014 10:06 am

Post by Majiffy »

OP updated.
Only playing in games at personal moderator and/or 50%+ playerlist request.


How To Win Every Game At Mafiascum (The Flowchart)
||
In case anyone was unsure...
Svenskt Stål (23:38) majiffy, worst mod on ms? we talk to a surviving victim of his game

Return to “Completed Mini Theme Games”