This is ridiculous.
I’m getting prodded for not posting? I haven’t posted since the logic underlying my vote on Panzer is wholly unaffected by the recent replacements, or the discussions following the replacement. I’m not going to analyze pages and pages of near-recent history, when I very thoroughly laid out my case against Panzer, voted, and stuck to it.
Panzer’s OMGUS vote on me, unsupported by anything other than bald assertion, continues to further cement my read on him being scum. As I have said time and time again, if I had another vote, I’d hammer Panzer right now. And “screenshots if Skruffs allows it”? Please.
Panzerjager wrote:
Jingolaw has acted proscum all game.
Jack wrote:
pj and cog contradict eachother. One of them has to be scum. They have both claimed, so what purpose does mass claim serve? None.
BINGO.
All this mass-claim nonsense is unnecessary. Guardian looks a little scummy for proposing it, but his logic isn’t faulty. It’s just that he’s basing it on us being at lylo, which I’m not sure is the case. This game has very odd rules and roles, as I’ve pointed out before, so I’m not sure our alignment tallies are that useful.
Nevertheless, what we have before us are counterclaims by CoG and Panzer. Plain and simple. There are other things to consider, certainly, but this is the most obvious and pressing. Its resolution will reveal a great deal, including shining light on the now-ongoing finger-pointing. I don’t read CoG as pro-town...but neither do I see him as scum at this point, so I can afford to defray suspicion...mostly because in the CoG vs. Panzer contest, I see Panzer as the definite scum.
If you’d like me to post several more messages explaining, yet again, that I think Panzer is scum and should be lynched, I’ll be happy to post one per day,
ad infinitum
.