In post 2272, Muffin wrote:thank you
Well you have degree in town planning, and that a process I respect and understand.
So of course i needed to answer your question, when it didn't cut across anything I was doing at the time
In post 2272, Muffin wrote:thank you
In post 2264, Flubbernugget wrote:
Egg is hard town for keeping up with the game, and for overall strong scumhunting.
@Tiershift what made you want to join this game?
In post 2262, Egg wrote:And you are voting him. So you actually ARE assuming two scum teams now?
In post 2277, Slandaar wrote:In post 2262, Egg wrote:And you are voting him. So you actually ARE assuming two scum teams now?
I mean that does make sense; Calling Thor scum for saying it's multiball insinuating Thor has inside knowledge. For this to hold you will start to assume multiball.
In post 1647, AxleGreaser wrote:@PereV
What is your current belief in how likely this game is to be multiball?
Why?
In post 1557, PeregrineV wrote:6. No mistake. I still believe that if there are 2 scumteams, Thor is likely scum (this was the initial thought- now that has gone up to 100% chance).
In post 2258, beastcharizard wrote:He did nothing. And that is the truth.
In post 2266, davesaz wrote:In post 2254, goodmorning wrote:In post 2195, davesaz wrote:In post 2144, goodmorning wrote:
The only agenda I have, as either alignment, is to figure things out.
I don't come into questioning intending anything else.
This does not quite ring true. Sure, maybe at a high level you're figuring things out, butthat's not the only factor in deciding whether to enter a discussion and how.Scum can and do butt inwhen a townie is after their buddy, for example.is a way to help a buddy without openly defending them. So information gathering as the explanation forDisrupting the questioning processentering a discussionis really shallow.
, so I'm really not sure where you're going with this.Ibeganthe questioning process
You are saying things that are not true. (Unless it is true that you never have an agenda, do you really mean that?)
Why does this need to be explained?
What alignment says things that aren't true?
In post 2242, The Fonz wrote:
I'm in the 'Don't lynch claimed PRs D1, unless there's a CC or hilariously bad fakeclaim' camp. These things work themselves out. See Simpsons Mafia as an example of why that's the case. The miller thing is basically a theory distraction, but essentially: I used to believe in lynching all claimed millers, but so many people believed millers should claim day one, and scum didn't fake miller as much as they should, so I stopped doing that. I specifically believe this specific claim to look more like the premature derp of a poor player than any kind of gambit.
In post 2281, Slandaar wrote:I lynch PR claims D1 quite often it works out well for me.
Not that it really matters, the point is that obviously town and scum alike often lynch claimed PR's D1 this means a generic statement of scum wouldn't try to lynch claimed PR's is obviously wrong and I believe GM knows this.
In post 2279, Slandaar wrote:To be honest assume was the wrong word; it will be considered more possible than what he would normally think which might cloud things.
I will have to look into what you said later I have thought about it but basically I need to look at the whole conversation thread.
But PV isn't an SK - the argument on Thor doesn't make sense from an SK because SK will assume one scumteam thus Thor's multiball comment doesn't look like a slip at all and there is no reason to fake scumreads as an SK.
In post 1431, Thor665 wrote:The urge to crack further jokes here is strong.
Because you got the names wrong again.
Whatevs.
In post 2157, Slandaar wrote:You don't think a scum agenda is to look active? or to look town?
In post 2284, Slandaar wrote:GM while you did your little dance earlier you never managed to answer this and I would like you to:
In post 2157, Slandaar wrote:You don't think a scum agenda is to look active? or to look town?
In post 2285, Slandaar wrote:Thor misreps PV by saying he should include SK's in the numbers
In post 2285, Slandaar wrote:I think PV felt is was possible Thor 'slipped' and considered it a strong possibility that if the game is multiball Thor is scum. You don't really need to make a big deal about it as you can wait a day or two when you know if it is or isn't leaving it in a reads list is no problem.
Then Thor goes after him for it, PV produces meta showing in his experience generally this sized game isn't multiball, Thor misreps PV by saying he should include SK's in the numbers and then from there PV is obviously going to suspect Thor - I also strongly disagree it was obvious Thor was using the term multi-ball to include SK's (backs up the above)
So, yes I think PV thought Thor is scum when he was voting him/was scumhunting him.
The argument about MB I need to look at a bit but basically I thought he was mostly arguing what he assumed the setup would be based on his experience because that was really what the argument was about. As said I need to look at your conversation thread as that does look different.
In post 2290, Egg wrote:Goodmorning, that's not even Amished because he's not complaining or attacking heph. Why did you feel the need to shoot it down before it was brought up?
In post 2287, Thor665 wrote:In post 2285, Slandaar wrote:Thor misreps PV by saying he should include SK's in the numbers
You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means.
In post 2246, TierShift wrote:I just read egg's walls.
In post 2063, Egg wrote:Tier wrote:
I feel very discouraged from reading because all the discussion before I left was nonsense and it probably is now. We nded a flip. Pere wouldn't be my first choice, but I can live with it
This is the kind of thing I'd expect Pere's scumbuddies to be saying right about now.
Is this the basis for your scumread on me?
I don't understand why exactly pere's buddies would say this and why town wouldn't.
Also associatives before the flip suck monkey nuts!
In post 2293, Slandaar wrote:In post 2287, Thor665 wrote:In post 2285, Slandaar wrote:Thor misreps PV by saying he should include SK's in the numbers
You keep using that word, I do not think it means what you think it means.
What word?
Misrep? I think that is the first time I used it.
PV clearly was using multiball to mean games with 2 scumteams therefore suggesting he should include SK's is a misrepresentation of what he is saying.