and in case anyone wonders, grib is scum because I do not believe him about his role pm. It contradicts what the mod has said and what my role pm says. So he's scum
In post 149, Beck wrote:I do agree that this back and forth is unproductive. Scum is you and grib. This was a pretty easy game to figure out.
GG everyone
I changed my mind. Beck is town. Wrong, but town.
I want someone else to summarize why they think I'm lying, or what the supposed contradiction is, because this feels like a game of Telephone and I am not getting lynched because everyone has a different idea of what happened.
My role pm says nothing about carnivores or omnivores being a threat. You says yours does. The mod has confirmed that scum can be any type, even a herbivore.
Its a direct contradiction to my own and to what we know about the setup.
Also, no comments about the buddying up that you're doing?
Nope
Cool OMGUS, bro
Beck, FFS. You really don't need to respond to every single post personally. Put the smartphone down for a couple hours, then come back and respond to stuff directed at you and stuff you find interesting. I swear, you're half the reason Rolling in the Deep went over 150 pages (the other half was me and Slandaar)
In post 160, Grib wrote:It doesn't say they're a threat, it says I hate them. I
perceived
them to be the threats against town, because I'm an Herbivore, and I'm town.
Get it?
Still essentially the same thing
Nope again.
In post 156, BlueBloodedToffee wrote:Scripten, can you go over the whole PM thing please because I'm not sure where Beck is coming from.
Must I? I thought he was taking the stance you were? It's kind of hard to tell.
In post 157, Grib wrote:
I changed my mind. Beck is town. Wrong, but town.
Why? I'm not seeing the towniness here. Maybe I'm conflating him being wrong with him being scum. It does happen. I just can't see how he can be playing like this as town.
Right and that's all I'm doing. Nothing about my play is bad, nothing about my play warrants the comment you just made about me.
You are the one who has falsely accused me of overreacting/flailing and when asked for an example can't be botherd to come up with one.
You are the same person who sees a player say their role pm directly contradicts what yours says, yet you don't find that suspicious and instead you find the person who's pointed it out suspicious.
In post 66, Beck wrote:post 63, Scripten wrote:
Because... I wanted to. Also, are you going to seriously police the way I play each of my games? And call me a tryhard? Wow.
I mean if you want to accuse someone for overreacting, why not deal with your own overreacting? Somebody decides to meta you and this is your response? A townie doesn't get mad or accuse somebody of "policing their play" because they did their due diligence to determine your alignment.
That is a classic overreaction.
Now humor me and show 1 post where I overreacted, I guarantee you can't find one.
In post 164, Pine wrote:Beck, FFS. You really don't need to respond to every single post personally. Put the smartphone down for a couple hours, then come back and respond to stuff directed at you and stuff you find interesting. I swear, you're half the reason Rolling in the Deep went over 150 pages (the other half was me and Slandaar)
I play how I play, I can't control my frequency, especially since most of my posts are responding to things directed at me
