In post 1273, goodmorning wrote:Oh, just one relevant post. OK.
Again. Brand new replacement. Not sure what is difficult to grasp here.
In post 1273, goodmorning wrote:Oh, just one relevant post. OK.
In post 1270, The Fonz wrote:In post 1267, goodmorning wrote:If you just got caught up then why not post some reads? An opinion on Thor vs Pere? An opinion on TSO vs Anen? Literally anything but a weak question about a joke post?
Erm, I did.
In post 1272, The Fonz wrote:In post 1267, goodmorning wrote:
I've run reaction tests way longer than 5 days. That said, it won't work, but that's because the player in question is gone.
Right. So now you can tell us who that player was, what parts of your play were the 'reaction test', and what reactions you expected from scum vs those you expected from town. Get to it.
In post 1271, goodmorning wrote:I literally cannot even begin to describe how hard this pinged.
In post 1271, goodmorning wrote:I have no real idea what you're talking about, but if this is an attempt to discredit me then I just got about 10000% more certain that I'm actually right.
In post 1227, The Fonz wrote:
In post 861, T S O wrote:that readslist is realllly surface deep, goes through just about every cliche there is and fencesits on some people
in other words, Aneninen is still scum.
Do you expect a readlist on day one of a large to have non-fencesitty opinions on everyone? I mean, LOATPs are kinda generally bad unless doing PoE. But still.of content, but doing nothing to advance the game.
In post 1278, goodmorning wrote:In post 1272, The Fonz wrote:In post 1267, goodmorning wrote:
I've run reaction tests way longer than 5 days. That said, it won't work, but that's because the player in question is gone.
Right. So now you can tell us who that player was, what parts of your play were the 'reaction test', and what reactions you expected from scum vs those you expected from town. Get to it.
OH, SASSY EH?
FUCK OFF.
(For anyone else who might be curious, you may want to attempt ISOing me and searching "Toby".)
In post 1282, T S O wrote:In post 1227, The Fonz wrote:
In post 861, T S O wrote:that readslist is realllly surface deep, goes through just about every cliche there is and fencesits on some people
in other words, Aneninen is still scum.
Do you expect a readlist on day one of a large to have non-fencesitty opinions on everyone? I mean, LOATPs are kinda generally bad unless doing PoE. But still.of content, but doing nothing to advance the game.
Clearly I'm still missing it - this is all I can see, and I sure as hell don't count that as a read.
I am going to look so fucking stupid if I've missed a post or something
In post 1282, T S O wrote:Clearly I'm still missing it - this is all I can see, and I sure as hell don't count that as a read.
In post 1278, goodmorning wrote:
FUCK OFF.
(For anyone else who might be curious, you may want to attempt ISOing me and searching "Toby".)
In post 206, goodmorning wrote:
In post 134, TobyLoby wrote:goodmorning, do you think Csareo is scummy, maybe townie, or null? I'm getting an everything from you.
It's pretty Null. I've seen this particular brand of play before, though I haven't played with this particular player, and it is not indicative imo. At least, not yet. Could be getting there.
In post 365, goodmorning wrote:In post 359, TierShift wrote:In post 346, Garmr wrote:I'm going to be honest I'm lost now and don't know what to think.
UNVOTE: toby
I don't like this post and I'll research you now.
Good, maybe you'll figure out what it is then.
Looking forward to Izariael's post.
I seem to have concluded that TSO is Town.
In post 1279, Thor665 wrote:I sort of feel you're discrediting yourself - you just admitted that your last five days have generated nothing.
In post 1281, Thor665 wrote:Walk me through what I'm supposed to see?
In post 1285, Thor665 wrote:In that post he did offer many reads and opinions.
In post 1288, goodmorning wrote:In post 1279, Thor665 wrote:I sort of feel you're discrediting yourself - you just admitted that your last five days have generated nothing.
Really.
Reeeeeallly.
In post 1288, goodmorning wrote:In post 1281, Thor665 wrote:Walk me through what I'm supposed to see?
You're not supposed to see anything. That's the point.
In post 1288, goodmorning wrote:In post 1285, Thor665 wrote:In that post he did offer many reads and opinions.
I disagree.
In post 1227, The Fonz wrote:Muffin's PerV push feels like the best push I've seen in this game. It rubs me up the wrong way that you attack another player's vote on the wagon you're on in a way that explicitly calls the attacking player scum, but then bend over backwards to point out this doesn't weaken your vote on the wagon in any way./quote]
In post 1227, The Fonz wrote:On that note, think PerV is scummy, mostly on the basis of the muffin case, not the Thor case.
In post 1227, The Fonz wrote:It is mildly suspicious that PerV pointed out the potential 'slip' in Thor then admitted he didn't think slipping is something Thor would do as soon as he's challenged on it.
In post 1227, The Fonz wrote:Scripten's gut town. I think Izariael is town who genuinely believes a 'strong null read' is a thing (LOL). Davesaz is really glaringly posting lots of IIoA. Newbie though. Consider this a warning to be more proactive. Nero's playing a very safe game, wouldn't have a problem lynching him, but PerV is better.
Also - I will offer a hearty smirk about he Izariel thing.
In post 1227, The Fonz wrote:On Boon, the point is that if he's town, scum now knows he's not vanilla anyway. But there's the risk that if he's scum, he's sliding by on a non-specific power claim. I'd lean no claim, just because I think he seems like a bad enough player that not knowing whether he has a major or minor PR if he's town is a significant problem for scum. Bullets to the face of people who have hinted power are bad. *Cough*Thor*Cough*
In post 1290, goodmorning wrote:I could go through it and explain why I find it underwhelming but 1. WORDS and 2. Thor would probably butt in afterwards.
In post 1284, The Fonz wrote:In post 1282, T S O wrote:In post 1227, The Fonz wrote:
In post 861, T S O wrote:that readslist is realllly surface deep, goes through just about every cliche there is and fencesits on some people
in other words, Aneninen is still scum.
Do you expect a readlist on day one of a large to have non-fencesitty opinions on everyone? I mean, LOATPs are kinda generally bad unless doing PoE. But still.of content, but doing nothing to advance the game.
Clearly I'm still missing it - this is all I can see, and I sure as hell don't count that as a read.
I am going to look so fucking stupid if I've missed a post or something
This is me asking you a question because I'm trying to get a read. How about you not be a dick and answer it?
In post 860, Aneninen wrote:
Thor– Thor is just being Thor. Is it easy to get annoyed by his style? Yes. Does that mean that he's scum? No. What I see is a town-Thor (though I've played with him only twice). But, there is something else.Somehow I can feel that he's nervous. But since there's no wagon against him this must be a town-frustration, in my opinion. Probably town.
In post 1268, Thor665 wrote:In post 1258, Nero Cain wrote:your case on PV is that:
he has bad reads
you feel he lied to you
and he thought you were scummy for bringing up MB?
My case is more eloquent, but, yes, you have functionally simplified it down - though I think the third and the first point are the same point - as the only read I cited as bad enough to be scummy is the read involving multiball, and I have no other scumtell associated with the multiball point other than inability to defend his belief in it being scummy. I also would note the lie is one I said he directed at town in general, not me in particular, though I will agree I was amongst those he lied to.
In post 1291, Thor665 wrote:Nero - scummy for reason stated, but a lesser read than Pere.
In post 1254, Nero Cain wrote:Why is fonz town?
Why is scrip town?
Why is Dave town?
Why is gamr town?
Why is hephaestus town?
Why is Muffin town?
Why is Tier town?