Mini 447 -Game Over

[AlSleet]

Sorry for the doublepost, I confused myself.

[Haschel Cedricson]

Because i miss read the thread and gave a reson that never happerned, also do we have a SK or a vig???

That's why you unvoted, but it doesn't answer my question. Why did you not vote for anyone else afterwards, after being told the rules on deadlines? Who do you think is scummy?

[pickemgenius]

Did you really monitor everyone who was and wasn't on from this game for nearly two hours. If you did, I'd say that's unhealthy. Plus, two hours is a relatively long span of time so I don't think it'd be terribly unlikely for someone to log in for even ten or fifteen minutes to NK. Also, some people keep their names hidden when they login so you should also consider that possibility.

I know this all seems very coincidental, but that's all it is. Coincidence. Now, you can follow your thin logic and lynch yet another townsperson or you can aim your suspicion at someone who warrants it more than I do.

Nope, just check shit to see who has recently posted on the front page during commercials, and didn't see anybody from this game post.

I really doubt it takes 15 minutes to decide who to NK.
The majority of scum talk about that nights kill amongst each other for a day or two going over different strategies, and would be very pissed if somebody just casually dropped in for ten minutes and sent a name.

Some people do keep theirs hidden, the whole ZOMG your name is hidden, joo must be scum game is really lame, and rarely right.

So who warrents suspicion more then you do?

[AlSleet]

Did you really monitor everyone who was and wasn't on from this game for nearly two hours. If you did, I'd say that's unhealthy. Plus, two hours is a relatively long span of time so I don't think it'd be terribly unlikely for someone to log in for even ten or fifteen minutes to NK. Also, some people keep their names hidden when they login so you should also consider that possibility.

I know this all seems very coincidental, but that's all it is. Coincidence. Now, you can follow your thin logic and lynch yet another townsperson or you can aim your suspicion at someone who warrants it more than I do.

Nope, just check shit to see who has recently posted on the front page during commercials, and didn't see anybody from this game post.

I really doubt it takes 15 minutes to decide who to NK.
The majority of scum talk about that nights kill amongst each other for a day or two going over different strategies, and would be very pissed if somebody just casually dropped in for ten minutes and sent a name.

Some people do keep theirs hidden, the whole ZOMG your name is hidden, joo must be scum game is really lame, and rarely right.

So who warrents suspicion more then you do?

Well, personally I think thethirdnail has been suspicious from the beginning with the bandwagoning and then trying to lynch the lurkers to take pressue off himself. And, this isn't a OMGUS think, but you're kinda suspicious to me. Your whole "I just change my vote alot" is a hard pill to swallow for me and I think it's just an excuse to protect your partner, who right now I believe is thethirdnail.

[SpinWizard]

Alright, I have three questions that I would like answered before I vote for anyone.

pickemgenius: You are the one who first advocated lynching somebody who had not shown up. Was there nobody else you felt was scummy enough to merit a vote?

SpinWizard: You unvoted thethirdnail before the deadline, but you failed to vote for anybody else afterwards. Why?

Blue Zebra: What is your analysis of pickemgenius and SpinWizard?

was i on in time???

[Haschel Cedricson]

was i on in time???

Yes. You were. In fact, you could have voted for somebody IN THE VERY SAME POST THAT YOU UNVOTED IN.

The rule about deadlines had been explained to you, and yet you did nothing.

[pickemgenius]

unvote

Look at my other games if you want.

Until I find a solid vote I jump around alot until I find somebody that I'm pretty sure is scum. Sometimes sooner then later.

[AlSleet]

unvote

Look at my other games if you want.

Until I find a solid vote I jump around alot until I find somebody that I'm pretty sure is scum. Sometimes sooner then later.

Fair enough.

So, who do you think(besides me) is looking scummy, pickemgenius?

Question goes for everyone else too.

[pickemgenius]

Blue Zebra.

I'm getting an actively lurking vibe from his posts.

[AlSleet]

Blue Zebra.

I'm getting an actively lurking vibe from his posts.

Yeah, likewise. I guess in what seems like a great irony I'll use your argument and say that the last few times I've signed in he's been on for awhile, yet has nothing to say.

FOS: BlueZebra

. Care to come to your defense?

[Blue Zebra]

So, who do you think(besides me) is looking scummy, pickemgenius?

Question goes for everyone else too.

SpinWizard and thethirdnail.

[Blue Zebra]

Blue Zebra.

I'm getting an actively lurking vibe from his posts.

Yeah, likewise. I guess in what seems like a great irony I'll use your argument and say that the last few times I've signed in he's been on for awhile, yet has nothing to say.

FOS: BlueZebra

. Care to come to your defense?

I was less interested in this game than the other ones I'm in.

[pickemgenius]

I can certainly understand that.

[Haschel Cedricson]

Fair enough.

So, who do you think(besides me) is looking scummy, pickemgenius?

Question goes for everyone else too.

SpinWizard. In fact, I'm going to

vote: SpinWizard

. He's been posting just enough so that we can't call him a lurker, yet his posts have surprisingly little substance.

[pickemgenius]

Fair enough.

So, who do you think(besides me) is looking scummy, pickemgenius?

Question goes for everyone else too.

SpinWizard. In fact, I'm going to

vote: SpinWizard

. He's been posting just enough so that we can't call him a lurker, yet his posts have surprisingly little substance.

*looks at Spinwizards posts*

He looks to be actively lurking as well.


I would/might vote for him as well to build pressure.

I would like to hear something before that happens though.

[AlSleet]

Fair enough.

So, who do you think(besides me) is looking scummy, pickemgenius?

Question goes for everyone else too.

SpinWizard. In fact, I'm going to

vote: SpinWizard

. He's been posting just enough so that we can't call him a lurker, yet his posts have surprisingly little substance.

You can use that argument for almost anyone who's in this game. Nobody's behavior has been particularly pro-town. Even the people who have been discussing have only said why they're suspicious of certain players. So

vote: SpinWizard

. Hopefully he'll come out and speak.

[blahgo]

Alright guys found a Replacement for Relph.



Paradoxombie replaces Relph effective ASAP.

[Paradoxombie]

Hello.

I have most of this day free, so I think I'll get right on reading through.

[Paradoxombie]

well, I gotta say this is a pretty messed up game.

Vote: Spinwizard

with 7 people, I'm inclined to think we have a vig and 1-2 mafia left

With so little to go on for so many people, our only choice is to use our two town kills to go after lurkers

I say we lynch Spinwizard and vig thethirdnail, hopefully one of them is scum, if not, we either lose or go lylo. It's not pretty, but I think that it is the only reasonable tactical decision.

I would appreciate hearing more from Blue Zebra

[Blue Zebra]

My analysis of everyone:

pickemgenius:
1. His vote on ryan looked like nothing out of the ordinary to me.
2. His vote on thethirdnail was most likely for discussion as he said it was.
3. His vote on Poison Ivy was pretty much random lynching, but there was nobody suspicious about, and I voted him too.
4. He always moves his vote around, so that's not suspicious either.
5. Overall, no suspicion for him.

Haschel Credicson:
1. Nothing worth mentioning, but no suspicion.

thethirdnail:
1. He placed a third vote on ryan, and when asked his reasons weren't very good.
2. He recently disappeared for some reason.
3. Slightly suspicious.

Paradoxombie:
1. Paradoxombie just got here, so no suspicion.

AlSleet:
1. AlSleet had replaced in two hours before the night kill, and he and pickemgenius were the only ones online in these two hours, but I don't think that's a good reason for suspicion.
2. No suspicion.

SpinWizard:
1. Supreme lack of content.
2. Suspicious.

[thethirdnail]

My dissapearance can be explained by vacation to denver for a week.

All I can really say for my suspicious posts is that it is a result of an overzealous rookie eager to make an impact.

I think paradoxombie's evaluation is a valid one, and would also like to hear from spinwizard.

[blahgo]

Guys I'm sending out a Prod in about an hour. I'd apreciate some posting going on.

[Blue Zebra]

I think we should use Paradoxombie's plan, unless anyone has any objections.

[AlSleet]

I think we should use Paradoxombie's plan, unless anyone has any objections.

I'm game. He's the most scummy and the least pro-town so far. I see little other choice.

[pickemgenius]

vote: Spinwizard

anti-town = bad.

nuff said